Advertisement

The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 117–140 | Cite as

Certification Matters: Is Green Talk Cheap Talk?

  • Shaun A. Bond
  • Avis Devine
Article

Abstract

There is an active and growing literature examining the rental rate, sales price, and occupancy premiums associated with sustainable or energy efficient certified real estate. To date, the focus has rested largely on office properties and for sale single family residential properties. We examine the rental rates achieved by green multifamily properties, providing the first look at the population of LEED market-rate apartments in the United States. We find an approximate 8.9 % rental rate premium associated with LEED apartments. Moreover, this research provides the first indication that LEED certification garners an additional premium over non-certified space that identifies as green, indicating the strength of the certification signal and contributing to the longstanding discussion on the merits of certification.

Keywords

Energy efficiency Sustainability Rent premium Multifamily 

JEL Classification

R11 R52 R58 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Michael Ferguson, David Brasington, and the participants at the 2015 AREUEA Annual Meeting, 2014 AREUEA International Meeting, Pepperdine University Speaker Series, and 2014 EBS Real Estate Conference for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Anderson, W., & Cunningham, W. (1972). The socially conscious consumer. The Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appraisal Institute. (2001). The appraisal of real estate (12th ed.). Chicago: The Appraisal Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Aroul, R., & Hansz, J. (2012). The value of “Green:” evidence from the first mandatory residential green building program. Journal of Real Estate Research, 34(1), 27–49.Google Scholar
  4. Brounen, D., & Kok, N. (2011). On the economics of energy labels in the housing market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62, 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caruana, R. (2007). A sociological perspective of consumption morality. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: a quality-based model for green product development. Management Science, 47, 250–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciochetti, B., & McGowan, M. (2010). Energy Efficiency Improvements: do they pay? Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 2(1), 305–333.Google Scholar
  8. Crane, A. (2001). Unpacking the ethical product. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ecofys. (2003). Cost effective climate protection in the eu building stock. Report for EURIMA. Cologne, Germany: Ecofys. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from http://www.ecofys.com/en/publication/cost-effective- climate-protection-in-the-eu-building-stock/.
  10. Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. (2009). Why do companies rent green? Real property and corporate social responsibility. London: RICS Research.Google Scholar
  11. Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. (2010). Doing well by doing good: green office buildings. American Economic Review, 100, 2494–2511.Google Scholar
  12. Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. (2013). The economics of green building. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuerst, F., & McAllister, P. (2009). An Investigation of the effect of eco-labeling on office occupancy rates. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1(1), 49–64.Google Scholar
  14. Fuerst, F., & McAllister, P. (2011). Green noise or green value? Measuring the effects of environmental certification on office values. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodwin, K., Waller, B., & Weeks, H. (2015). The impact of Broker Vernacular in Residential Real Estate. Journal of Housing Research.Google Scholar
  16. Haag, J., Rutherford, R., & Thomson, T. (2000). Real estate agent remarks: help or hype? Journal of Real Estate Research, 20, 205–215.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, K. (2011). What does Gen Y Want? REALTOR Magazine, May 2011.Google Scholar
  18. Heschmeyer, M. (2013). Real estate is local; so are price, amenities. Washington, DC: Costar. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from http://www.costar.com/News/Article/Real-Estate-Is-Local;-So-Are- Price-Amenities/149659.
  19. Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009). Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr013.Google Scholar
  20. Integra Realty Resources. (2013). Viewpoint 2013: Integra Realty Resources Real Estate Value Trends. New York: Integra Realty Resources, Inc. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from http://irr.com/_FileLibrary/Publication/13/viewpoint2013.pdf.
  21. Irwin, J., & Baron, H. (2001). Response mode effects and moral values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kats, G. (2003, October). The costs and financial benefits of green buildings: a report to California’s sustainable building task force. Washington, DC: U.S. Green building council. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from www.usgbc.org/Docs/News/News477.pdf.
  23. Kinnear, T., Taylor, J., & Ahmed, S. (1974). Ecologically concerned consumers: who are they? The Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kok, N. & Kahn, M. (2012). The value of green labels in the California housing market: an economic analysis of the impact of green labeling on the sales price of a home. Retrieved on January 29, 2015, from http://issuu.com/nilskok/docs/kk_green_homes_071912/3.
  25. Kok, N., McGraw, M., & Quigley, J. (2011). The diffusion of energy efficiency in building. American Economic Review, 101(3), 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, K. (2011). Generational change in paid and unpaid work. Canadian Social Trends. 92, catalogue no. 11- 008-X.Google Scholar
  27. Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. (2010). Do green products make up better people? Psychological Science, 21(4), 494–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, N., Spivey, J., & Florance, A. (2008). Does green pay off? Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 14(4), 385–400.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, A. (2007). The greening of U.S. investment real estate – market fundamentals, prospects and opportunities. RREEF Research Report. No. 57, November 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Schlegelmilch, B., Bohlen, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shrum, L., McCarty, J., & Lowrey, T. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Torres, B. (2010, June 3). Why Gen Y delays homebuying. San Francisco Business Times. Retrieved January 29, 2015, from http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2010/06/why_gen_y_delays_homebuying.html?pa ge = all.
  33. Wiley, J., Benefield, J., & Johnson, K. (2010). Green design and the market for commercial office space. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 41(2), 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. World Green Building Council. (2013). The business case for green building: a review of the costs and benefits for developers, investors and occupants. Retrieved on January 29, 2015, from http://www.worldgbc.org/files/8313/6324/2676/Business_Case_For_Green_Building_Report_WEB_2013- 03–13.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance and Real EstateUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.College of Business + EconomicsUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations