Skip to main content

Using Housing Futures in Mortgage Research

Abstract

Expectations of housing prices play an important role in real estate research. Despite their importance, obtaining a reasonable proxy for such expectations is a challenge. The existing literature on mortgage research either does not include housing expectation proxies in empirical models, or uses “backward-looking” proxies such as past housing appreciation or time series forecasts based on past housing appreciation. This paper proposes to use the transaction prices of Case-Shiller housing futures as an alternative “forward-looking” proxy. As an example, we compare the performances of four different expectation proxies in explaining mortgage default behavior. The loan level analysis shows that the futures based expectation proxy outperforms other proxies by having the highest regression model fit and being the only proxy that shows a significant negative effect on mortgage default behavior, as theory suggests. Out of sample predictions also show that futures have better prediction accuracy than other proxies. In addition, the paper shows that futures contain additional information that is not present in the backward-looking proxies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For simplicity, we use the term appreciation for both price increases or declines.

  2. 2.

    Financial futures are viewed as the market expectation of underlying product price movements in the financial derivatives literature. For example, the Federal funds futures are widely used as the market expectations of future monetary policies (e.g., Krueger and Kuttner 1996; Gürkaynak et al. 2007).

  3. 3.

    BBx data is similar to Loan Performance data. BBx data information is available at www.bbxlogic.com/data.htm.

  4. 4.

    Since our data is from privately securitized loans, the results may apply only to this set of mortgages.

  5. 5.

    Although (Case et al. 1993) have long been advocating a derivative market for housing in US, it was not until May 2006 that such a market was established.

  6. 6.

    After 2007, because of the mortgage crisis, very few newly originated loans were added into the dataset.

  7. 7.

    Loan status other than default or prepaid is considered censored which includes uninformative censoring and current status.

  8. 8.

    Lagged two months HPI is used since the release of CSI is lagged by two months and that represents the information available at the transaction time.

  9. 9.

    However, the high transactions costs in real estate do not imply that the predictability leads to arbitrage opportunities.

  10. 10.

    In order to calculate the survival probability, we also estimate the baseline hazard function after estimating the coefficient β.

References

  1. Ambrose, B. W., Buttimer Jr., R. J., & Capone, C. A. (1997). Pricing mortgage default and foreclosure delay. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(3), 314–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bajari, P., Chu, C. S., & Park, M. (2008). An empirical model of subprime mortgage default from 2000 to 2007. NBER working paper series.

  3. Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1989). The efficiency of the market for single-family homes. The American Economic Review, 1, 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Case, K. E., Shiller, R. J., & Weiss, A. N. (1993). Index-based futures and options markets in real estate. Journal of Portfolio Management, 19(2), 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox, D. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 34(2), 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demyanyk, Y., & Van Hemert, O. (2011). Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 1848–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Foote, C. L., Gerardi, K., & Willen, P. S. (2008). Negative equity and foreclosure: Theory and evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 234–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goetzmann, W. N., Peng, L., & Yen, J. (2009). The subprime crisis and house price appreciation. Working paper, available online at http://ssrn.com/paper=1340577.

  9. Gürkaynak, R. S., Sack, B. P., & Swanson, E. T. (2007). Market-based measures of monetary policy expectations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 25(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating (ROC) curve characteristic. Radiology, 143, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., & Kim, T. (1994). Default probabilities for mortgages. Journal of Urban Economics, 35(3), 278–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kau, J. B., & Kim, T. (1994). Waiting to default: The value of delay. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 22(3), 539–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krueger, J. T. & Kuttner, K. N. (1996). The fed funds futures rate as a predictor of federal reserve policy. Journal of Futures Markets, 16(8), 865–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leventis, A. (2008). Real estate futures prices as predictors of price trends. FHFA working paper.

  15. Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S., & McGee, V. (1983). Forecasting: Methods and applications. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shiller, R. J. (2007). Understanding recent trends in house prices and homeownership. In Proceedings of the symposium “Housing, housing finance, and monetary policy” (pp. 89–123). Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

  17. Zhou, X. H., McClish, D. K., & Obuchowski, N. A. (2002). Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the helpful comments from James Kau, Carlos Slawson, and other participants in LSU seminar, UGA seminar and AREUEA annual conference. We would like to thank the very helpful comments from one anonymous referee. We appreciate the support from Blackbox Logic, LSU High Performance Computing Center, and LSU Finance department. We thank Cihan Uzmanoglu for help with the data. All errors are our own.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuang Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, S., Pace, R.K. & Morales, W.A. Using Housing Futures in Mortgage Research. J Real Estate Finan Econ 48, 1–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-012-9381-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Housing futures
  • Real estate futures
  • Housing expectation
  • House price expectation
  • Mortgage default