Real Options Premia Implied from Recent Transactions in the Greek Real Estate Market

  • Andrianos Ε. Tsekrekos
  • George Kanoutos


This research is the first to examine the empirical predictions of a real option-pricing model on market values from the realty market of a Euro area country, namely Greece. Using a manually collected sample of land and property transaction prices, we demonstrate that, a model which incorporates the option to wait to develop land has explanatory power on observed prices over and above the intrinsic value from a simple discounted cash flow (DCF) approach. Recent land transactions in our sample seem to reflect a premium for the option to wait (‘real option premium’) that can be as high as 26.66%–52.38%, especially in the west and north suburbs of Athens. Estimates of annual volatility for specific properties, as implied by transaction prices, are found to range from 15% to 21%.


Real options Urban land values Greek real estate Development 

JEL Classification

G13 R33 



Thanks are due to an anonymous referee, Steven R. Grenadier (the editor), Athanasios Episcopos, Georgios Leledakis, Leonidas Rompolis, Thodoris Theodorakopoulos from RE/MAX Hellas, G. K. from Aspis Real Estate and Panayiotis Stamatis from Denaro Real Estate, as well as participants at the Empirical Finance session of the 9th HERCMA conference in Athens, Greece and the 2008 international conference on Applied Business and Economics in Thessaloniki, Greece. Usual disclaimers apply.


  1. Bar-Ilan, A., & Strange, W. C. (1996). Urban development with lags. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 39, 87–113.Google Scholar
  2. Bartik, T. J., & Smith, V. K. (1987). Urban amenities and public policy. In E. S. Mills (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol. 2 (pp. 1207–1254). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Bulan, L., Mayer, C., & Sommerville, C. T. (2009). Irreversible investment, real options, and competition: Evidence from real estate development. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, M. J., & Schwartz, E. S., (1985). Evaluating natural resource investments. Journal of Business, 58, 135–157.Google Scholar
  5. Capozza, D. R., & Li, Y. (1994). The intensity and timing of investment: The case of land. American Economic Review, 84, 889–904.Google Scholar
  6. Capozza, D. R., & Sick, G. A. (1991). Valuing long-term leases: The option to redevelop. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 204–223.Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, C. (2006). House price uncertainty, timing of development, and vacant land prices: Evidence for real options in Seattle. Journal of Urban Economics, 59, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixit, A., & Pindyck, R. S., (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Dumas, B. (1991). Super contact and related optimality conditions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 15, 675–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geltner, D., Riddiough, T., & Stojanovic, S. (1996). Insights on the effect of land use choice: The perpetual option on the best of two underlying assets. Journal of Urban Economics, 39, 20–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grenadier, S. R. (1995). Valuing lease contracts: A real options approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 38, 297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grenadier, S. R. (1996). The strategic exercise of options: Investment cascades and overbuilding in real estate market. Journal of Finance, 51, 1653–1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grovenstein, R. A., Kau, J. B., Munneke, H. J., (2011). Development value: A real options approach using empirical data, forthcoming Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Halvorsen, R., & Pollakowski, H. O., (1981). Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. Journal of Urban Economics, 10, 37–49.Google Scholar
  15. Holland, A. S., Ott, S. H., & Riddiough, T. J. (2000). The role of uncertainty in investment: An examination of competing investment models using commercial real estate data. Real Estate Economics, 28, 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, T., & Jou, J. B., (2010). Urban spatial development: A real options approach. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 40, 161-187.Google Scholar
  17. McDonald, R. L., & Siegel, D. R., (1985). Investment and the valuation of firms when there is an option to shut down. International Economic Review, 26, 331–349.Google Scholar
  18. McDonald, R. L., & Siegel, D. R., (1986). The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 707–727.Google Scholar
  19. Moel, A., & Tufano, P. (2002). When are real options exercised? An empirical study of mine closings. Review of Financial Studies, 15, 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paddock, J. L., Siegel, D. R., & Smith, J. L. (1988). Option valuation of claims on physical assets: The case of offshore petroleum leases. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Palmquist, R. B. (1991). Hedonic methods. In J. B. Braden & C. D. Kolstad (Eds.), Measuring the demand for environmental quality (pp. 77–120). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  22. Quigg, L. (1993). Empirical testing of real option-pricing models. Journal of Finance, 48, 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosen, R. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rubinstein, M. (1976). The valuation of uncertain streams and the pricing of options. Bell Journal of Economics, 7, 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shackleton, M. B., & Sødal, S. (2005). Smooth pasting as rate of return equalization. Economics Letters, 89, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sing, T. F., & Patel, K. (2001). Empirical evaluation of the value of waiting to invest. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 19, 535–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Titman, S. (1985). Urban land prices under uncertainty. American Economic Review, 75, 505–514.Google Scholar
  28. Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 1, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. (2008). The world fact book, Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC, ISBN: 9780160829697.Google Scholar
  30. Williams, J. T. (1991). Real estate development as an option. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yamaguchi, H., Takezawa, N., Sumita, U., Azarmi, T., (2000). The real option premium in Japanese land prices, Working paper, International University of JapanGoogle Scholar
  32. Yavas, A., & Sirmans, C. F. (2005). Real options: Experimental evidence. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 31, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting & FinanceAthens University of Economics & BusinessAthensGreece
  2. 2.Ace-Hellas SAAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations