Advertisement

Testing for Fraud in the Residential Mortgage Market: How Much Did Early-Payment-Defaults Overpay for Housing?

  • Paul E. CarrilloEmail author
Article

Abstract

Current explanations for the high rate of default and foreclosure in the U.S. emphasize house price fluctuations and lax lending criteria. Another explanation for default and foreclosure, which has generally been neglected in the academic literature but not by the FBI, is fraud. One impediment to identifying and measuring fraud is the lack of statistical tests capable of detecting it. This paper proposes a simple method to detect transactions where fraud may have occurred. The models proposed here are important for at least three reasons. First they can document the role of fraud in the mortgage foreclosure crisis. Second, they can serve as part of a forensic effort designed to detect and deter mortgage fraud. Third, they demonstrate that mortgage fraud distorts house price indexes because it artificially elevates house prices during the period of fraud followed by a subsequent collapse due to the foreclosure sales. Accordingly, fraud can give the false impression that foreclosure lowers area house prices when it actually artificially inflates them. This suggests an alternative interpretation for the recent empirical literature on externalities from foreclosure.

Keywords

Foreclosure Mortgage fraud Home prices Hedonic model 

JEL Codes

D11 D12 G21 R20 

References

  1. Albrecht, J., Anderson, A., Smith, E., & Vroman, S. (2007). Opportunistic matching in the housing market. International Economic Review, 48(2), 641–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, M. (1999). Search, bargaining and optimal asking prices. Real Estate Economics, 27, 453–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capone, Jr. C. A. (1996). Providing Alternatives to Mortgage Foreclosure: A Report to Congress, Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  4. Carrillo, P. E. (forthcoming). An Empirical Stationary Equilibrium Search Model of the Housing Market. International Economic Review.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, T. M., Clauretie, T. M., & Neill, H. R. (1997). Effect of foreclosure status on residential selling price: comment. Journal of Real Estate Research, 13, 95–02.Google Scholar
  6. Clauretie, T., & Daneshvary, N. (2009). Estimating the house foreclosure discount corrected for spatial price interdependence and endogeneity of marketing time. Real Estate Economics, 37(1), 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danis, M., & Pennington-Cross, A. (2008). The delinquency of subprime mortgages. Journal of Economics and Business, 60(1–2), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demyanyk, Y. & O. van Hemert. (2009). Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis. Review of Financial Studies doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhp033
  9. Deng, Y., Quigley, J. M., & van Order, R. (2000). Mortgage terminations, heterogeneity and the exercise of mortgage options. Econometrica, 68(2), 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubin, R. (2008). Foreclosures in Cleveland. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working paper.Google Scholar
  11. Duggan, M., & Levitt, S. (2002). Winning isn’t everything: corruption in sumo wrestling. The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1594–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elul, R. (2009). Securitization and mortgage default: reputation vs. adverse selection. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Paper No. 09-21.Google Scholar
  13. Epperson, J. F., Kau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., & Muller, W. J. (1985). Pricing default risk in mortgages. Journal of The American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 13, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fannie Mae. (2009). Fraud schemes and their characteristics; resources to help you combat mortgage fraud. https://www.efanniemae.com/utility/legal/pdf/fraudschchar.pdf .
  15. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council FFIEC. (2009). The detection and deterrence of mortgage fraud against financial institutions: a white paper. FFIEC Fraud Investigations Symposium. http://www.ffiec.gov/exam/Mtg_Fraud_wp_Feb2010.pdf
  16. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network FinCEN. (2006). Mortgage loan fraud: an industry assessment based upon suspicious activity report analysis. http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/reports/pdf/mortgage_fraud112006.pdf.
  17. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network FinCEN. (2008). Filing trends in mortgage loan fraud. http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/nr/pdf/20090225a.pdf.
  18. Foote, C., Gerardi, K., & Willen, P. (2008). Negative equity and foreclosure: theory and evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forgey, F. A., Rutherford, R. C., & VanBuskirk, M. L. (1994). Effect of foreclosure status on residential selling price. Journal of Real Estate Research, 9, 313–318.Google Scholar
  20. Foster, C., & van Order, R. (1984). An option-based model of mortgage default. Housing Finance Review, 3, 351–372.Google Scholar
  21. Foster, C., & van Order, R. (1985). FHA terminations: A prelude to rational mortgage pricing. Journal of The American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 13, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (1997). Equity and time to sale in the real estate market. The American Economic Review, 87, 255–269.Google Scholar
  23. Gerardi, K., A. Shapiro, & P. Willen. (2007). Subprime outcomes: risky mortgages, homeownership experiences, and foreclosures. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper 07–15.Google Scholar
  24. Gerardi K., A. Lehnert, S. Sherlund & P. Willen. (2008). Making sense of the subprime crisis. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Fall, 69–145.Google Scholar
  25. Glaeser, E., Gyourko, J., & Saiz, A. (2008). Housing supply and housing bubbles. Journal of Urban Economics, 64(2), 198–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glower, M., Haurin, D., & Hendershott, P. (1998). Selling time and selling price: The influence of seller motivation. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 26, 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haughwout, A., Peach, R., & Tracy, J. (2008). Juvenile delinquent mortgages: bad credit or bad economy? Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haurin, D. (1998). The duration of marketing time of residential housing. Real Estate Economics, 16(4), 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horowitz, J. (1992). The role of the list price in housing markets: theory and an econometric model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006). The external costs of foreclosure: the impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacob, B. & S. Levitt. (2003). Rotten apples: an investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 843–877.Google Scholar
  32. Kalejian, H. H., & Prucha, R. I. (1998). A generalized spatial two-stage least square procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalejian, H. H., & Prucha, R. I. (1999). A generalized moments estimators for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review, 40, 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kau, J. B., Keenan, D. C., Muller, W. J., & Epperson, J. F. (1992). A generalized valuation model for fixed-rate residential mortgages. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 24, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin, Z., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2009). Spillover effects of foreclosures on neighborhood property values. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38(4), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayer, C., Pence, K., & Sherlund, S. M. (2009). The rise in mortgage defaults. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pace, R. K., & Barry, R. (1997). Quick computation of spatial autoregressive estimates. Geographical Analysis, 29, 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pace, R. K., & Guilley, O. W. (1997). Using the spatial configuration of the data to improve estimation. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pace, R. K., Barry, R., Clapp, J. M., & Rodriguez, M. (1998). Spatio-temporal estimation of neighborhood effects. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pence, K. M. (2006). Foreclosing on Opportunity: State Laws and Mortgage Credit. Review of Economics and Statistics 88(1), 177–182.Google Scholar
  41. Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The value of foreclosed property. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(2), 193–214.Google Scholar
  42. Rogers, W. & W. Winter. (2009). The impact of foreclosures on neighboring housing sales, Journal of Real Estate Research.Google Scholar
  43. Shilling, J. D., Benjamin, J. D., & Sirmans, C. F. (1990). Estimating net realizable value for distressed real estate. Journal of Real Estate Research, 5, 129–139.Google Scholar
  44. Shroder, M. (2008). A worm’s eye view of the bubble. Working Paper presented at the AREUEA Midyear Conference in May, 2008.Google Scholar
  45. Springer, T. M. (1996). Single family housing transactions: seller motivations, price, and marketing time. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 13, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stanton, R. (1995). Rational prepayment and the valuation of mortgage-backed securities. Review of Financial Studies, 8(3), 677–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yavas, A. (1992). A simple search and bargaining model of real estate markets. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 20, 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yinger, J. (1981). A search model of real estate broker behavior. American Economic Review, 71, 591–605.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ESIAGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations