Skip to main content
Log in

Fair Lending Analysis of Mortgage Pricing: Does Underwriting Matter?

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of underwriting decision on fair lending risk assessments of loan pricing. Using data from one national bank that contain a rich set of decisioning variables, we compare the estimation results from the single equation model with those from the sample selection type of models. Then we conduct three simulation studies to evaluate the sample selection bias and omitted variable bias under various scenarios. We demonstrate that the single equation approach could potentially generate biased estimates of pricing disparities when it fails to consider the impact of the underwriting decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. No information that identifies the bank or its customers is disclosed here.

  2. Systematic differences might exist between the prices of denials and originations. For example, the APRs of the denials might be closer to their NRs and lower than they would have been if the loans had been approved, because certain loan costs such as points, fees, and mortgage insurance premiums might not be finalized until the loans are originated.

  3. There are two types of DTI ratio: the front-end and the back-end ratio. The front-end ratio calculates the ratio of housing expenses over income; while the back-end ratio also considers other recurring debts besides the housing costs. We decide to use the back-end DTI ratio in this paper.

  4. The corresponding odds ratio is exp(0.2296) = 1.26.

References

  • Ambrose, B., LaCour-Little, M., Sanders, A., & Calem, P. (2004). The effect of conforming loan status on mortgage yield spreads: a loan level analysis. Real Estate Economics, 32(4), 541–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1984). Tobit models: a survey. Journal of Econometrics, 24, 3–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, R., Canner, G., & Cook, R. (2005). New information reported under HMDA and its application in fair lending enforcement. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 91, 344–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkovec, J., Canner, G., Gabriel, S., & Hannan, T. (1994). Race, redlining, and residential mortgage loan performance. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9, 263–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, H., Boehm, T., & DeGennaro, R. (2003). Is there discrimination in mortgage pricing? The case of overages. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 1139–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocian, D., Ernst, K., & Li, W. (2008). Race, ethnicity and subprime home loan pricing. Journal of Economics and Business, 60, 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, T., & Schlottmann, A. (2007): Mortgage Pricing Differentials across Hispanic, African-American, and White Households: Evidence from the American Housing Survey. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 9.

  • Boehm, T., Thistle, P., & Schlottmann, A. (2006). Rates and race: an analysis of racial disparities in mortgage rates. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 109–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courchane, M. (2007). The pricing of home mortgage loans to minority borrowers: how much of the apr differential can we explain? Journal of Real Estate Research, 29, 399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courchane, M., & Nickerson, D. (1997). Discrimination resulting from overage practices. Journal of Financial Services Research, 11, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, G., & Rosenblatt, E. (1999). Differences in the cost of mortgage credit implications for discrimination. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 19, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, T., & Liebowitz, S. (1998). Mortgage lending to minorities: where’s the bias? Economic Inquiry, 36, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, J. (2005). Under-specified models and detection of discrimination: a case study of mortgage lending. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 31, 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G. (1998). Mortgage lending in Boston: a reconsideration of the evidence. Economic Inquiry, 36, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 153–161.

  • Horne, D. (1997). Mortgage lending, race, and model specification. Journal of Financial Services Research, 11, 43–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, S., & Day, T. (1993). A study that deserves no credit. Wall Street Journal, 1, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. (1983). Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, MA.

  • Maddala, G., & Nelson, F. (1975). Switching Regression Models with Exogenous and Endogenous Switching. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, 423–426.

  • Maddala, G., & Trost, R. (1982). On measuring discrimination in loan markets. Housing Finance Review, 1, 245–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munnell, A., Tootell, G., Browne, L., & McEneaney, J. (1996). Mortgage lending in Boston: interpreting HMDA data. American Economic Review, 86, 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothaft, F., & Perry, V. (2002). Do mortgage rates vary by neighborhood? Implications for loan pricing and redlining. Journal of Housing Economics, 11, 244–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., & Yezer, A. (1996). Self-selection and tests for bias and risk in mortgage lending: can you price the mortgage if you don’t know the process? Journal of Real Estate Research, 11, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, D. (1980). Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models. Journal of Econometrics, 12, 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlis, M., & Yezer, A. (1993). Serious flaws in statistical tests for discrimination in mortgage markets. Journal of Housing Research, 4, 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (1997). Mortgage lending discrimination and racial differences in loan default: a simulation approach. Journal of Housing Research, 8, 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (2000). Mortgage lending, sample selection and default. Real Estate Economics, 28, 581–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., & Tootell, G. (2004). Redlining, the community reinvestment act, and private mortgage insurance. Journal of Urban Economics, 55, 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengel, M., & Glennon, D. (1999). Evaluating statistical models of mortgage lending discrimination: a bank-specific analysis. Real Estate Economics, 27, 299–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2009). Borrowing while black: applying fair lending laws to risk-based mortgage pricing. South Carolina Law Review, 60, 677–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yezer, A., Phillips, R., & Trost, R. (1994). Bias in estimates of discrimination and default in mortgage lending: the effects of simultaneity and self-selection. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9, 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandi, M. (1993). Boston Fed’s bias study was deeply flawed. American Banker, 19, 13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the U.S. Department of the Treasury. I would like to thank Jason Dietrich, Irene Fang, Gary Whalen, Irina Paley, and especially the anonymous referee for their insightful comments and suggestions. I am also grateful to Beth Kaplan for excellent assistance with editing. Any errors are my own responsibilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y. Fair Lending Analysis of Mortgage Pricing: Does Underwriting Matter?. J Real Estate Finan Econ 46, 131–151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-011-9319-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-011-9319-y

Keywords

Navigation