Skip to main content
Log in

Testing for Bubbles in Housing Markets: A Panel Data Approach

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We employ recently developed cross-sectionally robust panel data tests for unit roots and cointegration to find whether house prices reflect house related earnings. We use U.S. data for Metropolitan Statistical Areas, with house price measured by the weighted-repeated-sales index and cash-flows by market tenants’ rents. In our full sample period, an error-correction model is not appropriate, i.e. there is a bubble. We then combine overlapping 10-year periods, price–rent ratios, and the panel data tests to construct a bubble indicator. The indicator is high for the late 1980s, early 1990s and since the late 1990s. Finally, evidence based on panel data Granger causality tests suggests that house price changes are helpful in predicting changes in rents and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, M. J., Muth, R. F., & Nourse, H. O. (1963). A regression method for real estate price index construction. Journal of American Statistical Association, 58, 933–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumohl, B. (2005). The secrets of economic indicators. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), Advances in econometrics, vol. 15: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic Panels (pp. 161–178). Amsterdam: JAI Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. A. (1996). OFHEO house price indexes: HPI technical description. Washington, D.C.: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Y. J., & R. J. Shiller (1987). Cointegration and tests of present value models. Journal of Political Economy, 95(5), 1062–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capozza, D. R., & Seguin, P. J. (1996). Expectations, efficiency, and euphoria in the housing market. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, K. E., & Shiller, R. J. (1989). The efficiency of the market for single-family homes. The American Economic Review, 79, 152–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T. E. (1995). Rents and prices of housing across areas of the United States: A cross-section examination of the present value model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallin, J. (2006). The long-run relationship between house prices and income: evidence from local housing markets. Real Estate Economics, 34(3), 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (1986). On testing for self-fulfilling speculative price bubbles. International Economic Review, 27(3), 545–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardi, K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometric Journal, 3, 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 101, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1978). Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica, 46, 1429–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpezzi, S. (1999). A simple error correction model of house prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 8, 27–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20, 597–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. (2000). Market efficiency and rationality in property investment. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 21(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Zemčík.

Additional information

CERGE-EI is a joint workplace of the Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education, Charles University, and the Economics Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mikhed, V., Zemčík, P. Testing for Bubbles in Housing Markets: A Panel Data Approach. J Real Estate Finan Econ 38, 366–386 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9090-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9090-2

Keywords

Navigation