Advertisement

Valuing Mortgage Insurance Contracts in Emerging Market Economies

  • Ashok Bardhan
  • Raša Karapandža
  • Branko Urošević
Article

Abstract

We develop a new option-based method for the valuation of mortgage insurance contracts in closed form in an economy where agents are risk neutral. While the proposed valuation method is general and can be used in any market, it may be particularly useful in emerging market economies where other existing methods may be either inappropriate or are too difficult to implement because of the lack of relevant data. As an application, we price a typical Serbian government-backed mortgage insurance contract.

Key Words

mortgage insurance default rate prepayment rate black-scholes formula emerging markets 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambrose, B., C. Capone, and Y. Deng. (2001). “Optimal Put Exercise: An Empirical Examination of Conditions for Mortgage Foreclosure,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 23(2), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aruñada, B. (2003). Property Rights as Organized Consent, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  3. Black, F., and M. Scholes. (1973). “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–654.Google Scholar
  4. Canner, G. B., and W. Passmore. (1994). Private Mortgage Insurance, Federal Reserve Bulletin, October 1994.Google Scholar
  5. Clauretie, T., and M. Jameson. (1990). “Interest Rates and the Foreclosure Process: An Agency Problem in FHA Mortgage Insurance,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 57, 701–711.Google Scholar
  6. Deng, Y., and S. Gabriel. (2002). “Enhancing Mortgage Credit Availability Among Underserved and Higher Credit-Risk Populations: An Assessment of Default and Prepayment Option Exercise Among FHA-Insured Borrowers,” USC Marshall School of Business Working Paper No. 02–10.Google Scholar
  7. Deng, Y., J. Quigley, and R. Van Order. (2000). “Mortgage Terminations, Heterogeneity and the Exercise of Mortgage Options,” Econometrica 68(2), 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis, B., C. Kuo, and T. Yang. (1997). “Rationales of Mortgage Insurance Premium Structures,” Journal of Real Estate Research 14(3), 359–378.Google Scholar
  9. Hardt, J., and J. Lichtenberger. (2001). “The Economic and Financial Importance of Mortgage Bonds in Europe,” Housing Finance International 15(4), 19–29.Google Scholar
  10. Hendershott, P., and R. Van Order. (1987). “Pricing Mortgages: Interpretation of the Models and Results,” Journal of Financial Services Research 1(1) (September), 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hull, J. (1999). Options, Futures, and Other Derivative Securities, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Jackson, J., and D. Kaserman. (1980). “Default Risk on Home Mortgage Loans: A Test of Competing Hypotheses,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 47, 678–690.Google Scholar
  13. Jaffee, D., and B. Renaud. (1995). Securitization in European Mortgage Markets. Paper presented at the First International Real Estate Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  14. Jaffee, D., and B. Renaud. (1997). “Strategies to Develop Mortgage Markets in Transition Economies.” In J. Doukas, V. Murinde, and C. Wihlborg (eds.), Financial Sector Reform and Privatization in Transition Economies, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers pp. 69–93.Google Scholar
  15. Kau, J., and D. Keenan. (1995). “An Overview of the Option-Theoretic Pricing of Mortgages,” Journal of Housing Research 6(2), 217–244.Google Scholar
  16. Kau, J., and D. Keenan. (1999). “Catastrophic Default and Credit Risk for Lending Institutions,” Journal of Financial Services Research 15(2), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kau, J., D. Keenan, W. Muller, and J. Epperson. (1992). “A Generalized Valuation Model for Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgages,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 24, 280–299.Google Scholar
  18. Kau, J., D. Keenan, and W. Muller. (1993). “An Option-Based Pricing Model of Private Mortgage Insurance,” The Journal of Risk and Insurance 60(2), 288–299.Google Scholar
  19. Kau, J. B., D. C. Keenan, W. J. Muller, and J. E. Epperson. (1995). “The Valuation at Origination of Fixed-Rate Mortgages with Default and Prepayment,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 11, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Price Waterhouse LLP (1997). An Actuarial Review for Fiscal Year 1996 of the Federal Housing Administration' Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, Arlington, VA: FHA.Google Scholar
  21. Schwartz, E., and W. Torous. (1992). “Prepayment, Default, and the Valuation of Mortgage Pass-Through Securities,” Journal of Business 65(2), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swan, C. (1982). “Pricing Private Mortgage Insurance,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 10, 276–296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashok Bardhan
    • 1
  • Raša Karapandža
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Branko Urošević
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, Haas School of BusinessUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and BusinessUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.South European Center for Contemporary FinanceBelgradeSerbia and Montenegro
  4. 4.Scientific Computing Laboratory, Institue of PhysicsBelgradeSerbia and Montenegro
  5. 5.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations