Writing and reading performance in Year 1 Australian classrooms: associations with handwriting automaticity and writing instruction

Malpique, Anabela Abreu; Pino-Pasternak, Deborah; Roberto, Magda Sofia

doi:10.1007/s11145-019-09994-z

Published: 13 November 2019

Writing and reading performance in Year 1 Australian classrooms: associations with handwriting automaticity and writing instruction

Anabela Abreu Malpique ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1683-9906^1,2,
Deborah Pino-Pasternak³ &
Magda Sofia Roberto²

Reading and Writing volume 33, pages 783–805 (2020)Cite this article

1218 Accesses
7 Citations
44 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

Theories of writing development and accumulating evidence indicate that handwriting automaticity is related to the development of effective writing skills, and that writing and reading skills are also associated with each other. However, less is known about the nature of these associations and the role of instructional factors in the early years. The present study examines: (1) the influence of handwriting automaticity in the writing and reading performance of Year 1 students, both concurrently and across time; (2) associations between students’ writing and reading performance and writing instruction. The current study involved 154 children enrolled in 24 classrooms from seven government-funded primary schools in Western Australia. Handwriting automaticity and word-reading were assessed at the end of kindergarten (M_age = 70 months, SD = 4.37 months) and a year later at the end of Year 1 (M_age = 82 months, SD = 3.64 months). Child-level measures of writing quality and production as well as teacher-reported measures of writing instruction were added in Year 1. Teachers reported on amount and type of writing instruction (i.e., teaching basic skills and teaching writing processes) and amount of writing practice in their classrooms. Data analyses included multilevel modelling. Handwriting automaticity predicted writing quality and production concurrently and across time after accounting for gender and initial word-reading skills. Handwriting automaticity predicted reading performance across time. Writing and reading performance were associated with amount of writing practice, while teaching planning and revising were positively associated with writing performance. Implications for writing development and writing instruction are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,106(2), 419. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035692.
Article Google Scholar
Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., Fidalgo, R., Carvalhais, L., Pereira, L. Á., & Castro, S. L. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,5, 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000089.
Article Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Average weekly earnings, Australia, May 2015 (cat. no. 6302.0). Retrieved July 2018, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/6302.0Main+Features1May%202015?OpenDocument.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). Guide to understanding ICSEA. Sydney, Australia: ACARA. Retrieved February 2016, from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Guide_to_understanding_ICSEA.pdf.
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). National assessment program: literacy and numeracy. Retrieved December 2018, from https://reports.acara.edu.au/.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software,67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Article Google Scholar
Bazerman, C., Applebee, A. N., Berninger, V. W., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Matsuda, P., et al. (2017). Taking the long view on writing development. Research in the Teaching of English,51(3), 351–360.
Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disabilities Quarterly,22, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511269.
Article Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities,35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104.
Article Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Augsburger, A., & Garcia, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly,32(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740364.
Article Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., et al. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology,29(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5.
Article Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., & Rutberg, J. (1992). Relationship of finger function to beginning writing: Application to diagnosis of writing disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,34, 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb14993.x.
Article Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Brooks, A., Rogan, L. W., et al. (1997). Treatment of handwriting fluency problems in beginning writing: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.652.
Article Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Bingham, G. E., Quinn, M. F., & Gerde, H. K. (2017). Examining early childhood teachers’ writing practices: Associations between pedagogical supports and children’s writing skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,39, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.01.002.
Article Google Scholar
Christensen, C. A. (2005). The role of orthographic–motor integration in the production of creative and well-structured written text for students in secondary school. Educational Psychology,25, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500042076.
Article Google Scholar
Coker, D. L., Jr., Farley-Ripple, E., Jackson, A. F., Wen, H., MacArthur, C. A., & Jennings, A. S. (2016). Writing instruction in first grade: An observational study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,29, 793–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9596-6.
Article Google Scholar
Coker, D. L., Jr., Jennings, A. S., Farley-Ripple, E., & MacArthur, C. A. (2018). When the type of practice matters: The relationship between typical writing instruction, student practice, and writing achievement in first grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology,54, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.013.
Article Google Scholar
Cordeiro, C., Castro, S. L., & Limpo, T. (2018). Examining potential sources of gender differences in writing: The role of handwriting fluency and self-efficacy beliefs. Written Communication,35(4), 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318788843.
Article Google Scholar
Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012656.
Article Google Scholar
Dockrell, J. E., Marshall, C. R., & Wyse, D. (2016). Teachers’ reported practices for teaching writing in England. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,29, 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9605-9.
Article Google Scholar
Feng, L., Lindner, A., Ji, X. R., & Joshi, R. M. (2017). The roles of handwriting and keyboarding in writing: A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,32, 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9749-x.
Article Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist,35, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5.
Article Google Scholar
Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal,110, 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193.
Article Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist,53, 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406.
Article Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education,43, 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125.
Article Google Scholar
Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170.
Article Google Scholar
Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Olson, C. B., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide. NCEE 2012-4058. What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved November 2017, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533112.pdf.
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review,81(4), 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566.
Article Google Scholar
Graham, S., Hebert, M., Paige Sandbank, M., & Harris, K. R. (2016). Assessing the writing achievement of young struggling writers: Application of generalizability theory. Learning Disability Quarterly,39(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714555019.
Article Google Scholar
Graham, S., Liu, K., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., et al. (2017). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading and reading instruction on writing. Review of Educational Research,88, 243–284. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927.
Article Google Scholar
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012b). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(4), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185.
Article Google Scholar
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education,1(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001.
Article Google Scholar
Jones, D., & Christensen, C. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44.
Article Google Scholar
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology,78, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243.
Article Google Scholar
Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research,86(2), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491.
Article Google Scholar
Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27, 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1.
Article Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Folsom, J. S., & Gruelich, L. (2014). The contributions of vocabulary and letter writing automaticity to word reading and spelling for kindergartners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9440-9.
Article Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Sidler, J. F., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences,21, 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004.
Article Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Sidler, J. F., & Greulich, L. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,28, 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.01.001.
Article Google Scholar
Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., & Wanzek, J. (2015). Kindergarten predictors of third grade writing. Learning and Individual Differences,37, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.009.
Article Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software,82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
Article Google Scholar
Łaszkiewicz, E. (2013). Sample size and structure for multilevel modelling: Monte Carlo investigation for the balanced design. Quantitative Methods in Economics,14(2), 19–28.
Google Scholar
Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods,49(4), 1494–1502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y.
Article Google Scholar
Malpique, A. A., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Valcan, D. (2017). Handwriting automaticity and writing instruction in Australian kindergarten: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,30, 1789–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9753-1.
Article Google Scholar
McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist,35, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3.
Article Google Scholar
McMaster, K. L., Du, X., & Pétursdóttir, A. L. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities,42, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326212.
Article Google Scholar
McNeish, D., & Stapleton, L. (2016). Modeling clustered data with very few clusters. Multi-variate Behavioral Research,51(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1167008.
Article Google Scholar
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NREL) (2011). 6 + 1 Trait^® Writing. Retrieved February 2016, from http://educationnorthwest.org/traits.
Pelling, N., & Burton, L. (2017). The elements of applied psychological practice in Australia: preparing for the National Psychology Examination. London: Psychology Press.
Book Google Scholar
Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders,34(6), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(01)00060-0.
Article Google Scholar
Puranik, C., & Al Otaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,25, 1523–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x.
Article Google Scholar
Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology,110(5), 640–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000237.
Article Google Scholar
School Curriculum and Standards Authority (SCSA). (2017a). Judging standards in Year 1. Retrieved December 2017, from https://k10outline.scsa.wa.edu.au/media/documents/judgingstandards/year-1/english-v8.1/assessment-pointers/Year_1_English_Judging_Standards_Assessment-Pointers_2017.PDF.
School Curriculum and Standards Authority (SCSA). (2017b). Handwriting guidelines. Retrieved December 2017, from http://ecm.det.wa.edu.au/connect/resolver/view/PDENG001/latest/PDENG001.pdf.
R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical. Retrieved February 2018, from https://www.r-project.org.
Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & Lawrence, A. M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,26(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2.
Article Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2007). Wechsler individual achievement test—second edition, Australian standardised edition (WIAT-II Australian). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Google Scholar
White, K. M. (2013). Associations between teacher–child relationships and children’s writing in kindergarten and first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,28(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.05.004.
Article Google Scholar
Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., & Tømte, C. (2016). The impact of digital devices vs. Pen (cil) and paper on primary school students’ writing skills—a research review. Computers & Education,95, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.001.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Australian Research Council through the Discovery Early Career Award Funding Scheme (DECRA 150100731).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

School of Education, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia
Anabela Abreu Malpique
CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013, Lisbon, Portugal
Anabela Abreu Malpique & Magda Sofia Roberto
University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
Deborah Pino-Pasternak

Authors

Anabela Abreu Malpique
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Deborah Pino-Pasternak
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Magda Sofia Roberto
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anabela Abreu Malpique.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malpique, A.A., Pino-Pasternak, D. & Roberto, M.S. Writing and reading performance in Year 1 Australian classrooms: associations with handwriting automaticity and writing instruction. Read Writ 33, 783–805 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09994-z

Download citation

Published: 13 November 2019
Issue Date: March 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09994-z

Keywords

Early education
Handwriting automaticity
Reading development
Writing development
Writing instruction