Writing and reading performance in Year 1 Australian classrooms: associations with handwriting automaticity and writing instruction

Abstract

Theories of writing development and accumulating evidence indicate that handwriting automaticity is related to the development of effective writing skills, and that writing and reading skills are also associated with each other. However, less is known about the nature of these associations and the role of instructional factors in the early years. The present study examines: (1) the influence of handwriting automaticity in the writing and reading performance of Year 1 students, both concurrently and across time; (2) associations between students’ writing and reading performance and writing instruction. The current study involved 154 children enrolled in 24 classrooms from seven government-funded primary schools in Western Australia. Handwriting automaticity and word-reading were assessed at the end of kindergarten (Mage = 70 months, SD = 4.37 months) and a year later at the end of Year 1 (Mage = 82 months, SD = 3.64 months). Child-level measures of writing quality and production as well as teacher-reported measures of writing instruction were added in Year 1. Teachers reported on amount and type of writing instruction (i.e., teaching basic skills and teaching writing processes) and amount of writing practice in their classrooms. Data analyses included multilevel modelling. Handwriting automaticity predicted writing quality and production concurrently and across time after accounting for gender and initial word-reading skills. Handwriting automaticity predicted reading performance across time. Writing and reading performance were associated with amount of writing practice, while teaching planning and revising were positively associated with writing performance. Implications for writing development and writing instruction are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,106(2), 419. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alves, R. A., Limpo, T., Fidalgo, R., Carvalhais, L., Pereira, L. Á., & Castro, S. L. (2016). The impact of promoting transcription on early text production: Effects on bursts and pauses, levels of written language, and writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,5, 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). Average weekly earnings, Australia, May 2015 (cat. no. 6302.0). Retrieved July 2018, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/6302.0Main+Features1May%202015?OpenDocument.

  4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). Guide to understanding ICSEA. Sydney, Australia: ACARA. Retrieved February 2016, from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Guide_to_understanding_ICSEA.pdf.

  5. Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018). National assessment program: literacy and numeracy. Retrieved December 2018, from https://reports.acara.edu.au/.

  6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software,67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bazerman, C., Applebee, A. N., Berninger, V. W., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Matsuda, P., et al. (2017). Taking the long view on writing development. Research in the Teaching of English,51(3), 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disabilities Quarterly,22, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities,35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Augsburger, A., & Garcia, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly,32(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., et al. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology,29(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berninger, V. W., & Rutberg, J. (1992). Relationship of finger function to beginning writing: Application to diagnosis of writing disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,34, 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb14993.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Brooks, A., Rogan, L. W., et al. (1997). Treatment of handwriting fluency problems in beginning writing: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berninger, V. W., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bingham, G. E., Quinn, M. F., & Gerde, H. K. (2017). Examining early childhood teachers’ writing practices: Associations between pedagogical supports and children’s writing skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,39, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen, C. A. (2005). The role of orthographic–motor integration in the production of creative and well-structured written text for students in secondary school. Educational Psychology,25, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500042076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coker, D. L., Jr., Farley-Ripple, E., Jackson, A. F., Wen, H., MacArthur, C. A., & Jennings, A. S. (2016). Writing instruction in first grade: An observational study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,29, 793–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9596-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Coker, D. L., Jr., Jennings, A. S., Farley-Ripple, E., & MacArthur, C. A. (2018). When the type of practice matters: The relationship between typical writing instruction, student practice, and writing achievement in first grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology,54, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cordeiro, C., Castro, S. L., & Limpo, T. (2018). Examining potential sources of gender differences in writing: The role of handwriting fluency and self-efficacy beliefs. Written Communication,35(4), 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318788843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dockrell, J. E., Marshall, C. R., & Wyse, D. (2016). Teachers’ reported practices for teaching writing in England. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,29, 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9605-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng, L., Lindner, A., Ji, X. R., & Joshi, R. M. (2017). The roles of handwriting and keyboarding in writing: A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,32, 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9749-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist,35, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The Elementary School Journal,110, 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist,53, 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education,43, 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Olson, C. B., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide. NCEE 2012-4058. What Works Clearinghouse. Retrieved November 2017, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533112.pdf.

  30. Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review,81(4), 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Graham, S., Hebert, M., Paige Sandbank, M., & Harris, K. R. (2016). Assessing the writing achievement of young struggling writers: Application of generalizability theory. Learning Disability Quarterly,39(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714555019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Graham, S., Liu, K., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., et al. (2017). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading and reading instruction on writing. Review of Educational Research,88, 243–284. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012b). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(4), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education,1(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2012.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones, D., & Christensen, C. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology,78, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research,86(2), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27, 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Folsom, J. S., & Gruelich, L. (2014). The contributions of vocabulary and letter writing automaticity to word reading and spelling for kindergartners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,27, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9440-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Sidler, J. F., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences,21, 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Sidler, J. F., & Greulich, L. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,28, 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., & Wanzek, J. (2015). Kindergarten predictors of third grade writing. Learning and Individual Differences,37, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software,82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Łaszkiewicz, E. (2013). Sample size and structure for multilevel modelling: Monte Carlo investigation for the balanced design. Quantitative Methods in Economics,14(2), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods,49(4), 1494–1502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Malpique, A. A., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Valcan, D. (2017). Handwriting automaticity and writing instruction in Australian kindergarten: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,30, 1789–1812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9753-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist,35, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McMaster, K. L., Du, X., & Pétursdóttir, A. L. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities,42, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. McNeish, D., & Stapleton, L. (2016). Modeling clustered data with very few clusters. Multi-variate Behavioral Research,51(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1167008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NREL) (2011). 6 + 1 Trait® Writing. Retrieved February 2016, from http://educationnorthwest.org/traits.

  51. Pelling, N., & Burton, L. (2017). The elements of applied psychological practice in Australia: preparing for the National Psychology Examination. London: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders,34(6), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(01)00060-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Puranik, C., & Al Otaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,25, 1523–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018). Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills. Journal of Educational Psychology,110(5), 640–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. School Curriculum and Standards Authority (SCSA). (2017a). Judging standards in Year 1. Retrieved December 2017, from https://k10outline.scsa.wa.edu.au/media/documents/judgingstandards/year-1/english-v8.1/assessment-pointers/Year_1_English_Judging_Standards_Assessment-Pointers_2017.PDF.

  56. School Curriculum and Standards Authority (SCSA). (2017b). Handwriting guidelines. Retrieved December 2017, from http://ecm.det.wa.edu.au/connect/resolver/view/PDENG001/latest/PDENG001.pdf.

  57. R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical. Retrieved February 2018, from https://www.r-project.org.

  58. Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & Lawrence, A. M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,26(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9379-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wechsler, D. (2007). Wechsler individual achievement test—second edition, Australian standardised edition (WIAT-II Australian). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  60. White, K. M. (2013). Associations between teacher–child relationships and children’s writing in kindergarten and first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,28(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., & Tømte, C. (2016). The impact of digital devices vs. Pen (cil) and paper on primary school students’ writing skills—a research review. Computers & Education,95, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Australian Research Council through the Discovery Early Career Award Funding Scheme (DECRA 150100731).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anabela Abreu Malpique.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malpique, A.A., Pino-Pasternak, D. & Roberto, M.S. Writing and reading performance in Year 1 Australian classrooms: associations with handwriting automaticity and writing instruction. Read Writ 33, 783–805 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09994-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Early education
  • Handwriting automaticity
  • Reading development
  • Writing development
  • Writing instruction