Abstract
We examined the influence of teachers’ use of instructional time on students’ learning within the context of a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of a content-area reading comprehension intervention. Participants were 8th grade social studies teachers who had their classes randomly assigned to either Promoting Acceleration of Comprehension and Content through Text (PACT) or business-as-usual (BAU). In both conditions, the same social studies content was the focus of instruction. Thirty-five 8th grade teachers (18 female, 17 male) audio-record instruction in both PACT and BAU classes for the duration of the 6–8 week intervention. Instruction was coded on five dimensions: interactive instruction, teacher silence, noninstructional activities, video usage, and neutral class time. Social studies knowledge acquisition was measured amongst 2786 8th grade students. Findings indicated that teachers spent more time engaged in interactive instruction when delivering content-area instruction in PACT classrooms as compared to BAU classrooms. Further, instructional behaviors were significantly related to changes in content knowledge acquisition in the BAU classes. In the treatment condition, teachers’ instructional behaviors were not significantly related to changes in content acquisition, except for noninstructional activities and non-content related video, which both had negative effects. Our findings suggest that while interactive instructional time remains important, the instructional methods utilized during this time are equally (if not more) impactful on student achievement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, L. W. (1981). Instruction and time-on-task: A review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13, 289–303.
Balfanz, R. (2009). Putting middle grades students on the graduation path: A policy and practice brief. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association. Retrieved on August 30, 2018 from: http://www.amle.org/portals/0/pdf/articles/Policy_Brief_Balfanz.pdf.
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Brown, B. W., & Saks, D. H. (1986). Measuring the effects of instructional time on student learning: Evidence from the beginning teacher evaluation study. American Journal of Education, 94, 480–500.
Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., & Rintamaa, M. (2013). Reading intervention in middle and high schools: Implementation fidelity, teacher efficacy, and student achievement. Reading Psychology, 34(1), 26–58.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
Chiodo, J. J., & Byford, J. (2004). Do they really dislike social studies? A study of middle school and high school students. Journal of Social Studies Research, 28(1), 16.
Cusick, P. A. (1973). Adolescent groups and the school organization. The School Review, 82(1), 116–126.
Edmonds, M., & Briggs, K. L. (2003). The instructional content emphasis instrument: Observations of reading instruction. In S. Vaughn & K. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (pp. 31–52). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
Fredrick, W. C. (1977). The use of classroom time in high schools above or below the median reading score. Urban Education, 11, 459–464.
Fredrick, W. C., Walberg, H. J., & Rasher, S. P. (1979). Time, teacher comments, and achievement in urban high schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(2), 63–65.
Gamoran, A., & Nystrand, M. (1991). Background and instructional effects on achievement in eighth-grade English and social studies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1(3), 277–300.
Gettinger, M. (1984). Individual differences in time needed for learning: A review of the literature. Educational Psychologist, 19, 15–29.
Guthrie, J. T., Martuza, V., & Seifert, M. (1976). Impacts of instructional time in reading. In Paper presented at the conference on theory and practice of beginning reading instruction, Pittsburg, PA.
Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics LLC.
Harlow, L. L. (2014). The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods. New York, NY: Routledge.
Harnischfeger, A., & Wiley, D. E. (1985). Origins of active learning time. In C. W. Fisher & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspectives on instructional time (pp. 133–156). New York, NY: Longman.
Harris, A. J., & Serwer, B. L. (1966). The CRAFT project: Instructional time in reading research. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 27–56.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A Prac- tice Guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc. Accessed 30 Nov 2018.
Karweit, N. (1978). The organization of time in schools: Time scales and learning. Paper presented at the Conference on School Productivity and Finance, San Diego, CA.
Karweit, N., & Slavin, R. E. (1982). Time-on-task: Issues of timing, sampling, and definition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 844–851.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M. E., Tejero Hughes, M., & Ahwee Leftwich, S. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading: “Real-world” lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 291–302.
Lee, C. D., & Spratley, A. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analyses. In D. Sorbom (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 342–380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41–51.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017). The nation’s report card: 2017 Mathematics and reading assessments. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Park, C. (1976). The Bay City experiment…As seen by the director. Journal of Teacher Education, 7, 5–8.
Rossmiller, R. A. (1986). Resource utilization in schools and classrooms: Final report (Program Report 86-7). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
Schoemann, A. M., Rhemtulla, M., & Little, T. D. (2014). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 571–588). Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press.
Simmons, D. C., Kame’enui, E. J., Harn, B., Coyne, M. D., Stoolmiller, M., Edwards Santoro, L., et al. (2007). Attributes of effective and efficient kindergarten reading intervention: An examination of instructional time and design specificity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 331–347.
Sisk, R. J. (2011). Team-based learning: Systematic research review. Journal of Nursing Education, 50, 665–669.
Swanson, E., Hairrell, A., Kent, S., Ciullo, S., Wanzek, J. A., & Vaughn, S. (2014). A synthesis and meta-analysis of reading interventions using social studies content for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 178–195.
Swanson, E., & Wanzek, J. (2014). Applying research in reading comprehension to social studies instruction for middle and high school students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 49, 142–147.
Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Fall, A. M., Roberts, G., Hall, C., et al. (2017). Middle school reading comprehension and content learning intervention for below-average readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 33, 37–53.
Swanson, E., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Fall, A. M. (2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 426–442.
Sweet, M., & Michaelsen, L. K. (2012). Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing LLC.
Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Wanzek, J., Roberts, G., Swanson, E., & Fall, A. M. (2017). Improving content knowledge and comprehension for English language learners: Findings from a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 22.
Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., Swanson, E. A., Wanzek, J., Fall, A. M., & Stillman-Spisak, S. J. (2015). Improving middle-school students’ knowledge and comprehension in social studies: A replication. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 31–50.
Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., Wanzek, J., Stillman-Spisak, S. J., Solis, M., et al. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 77–93.
Wanzek, J., Kent, S. C., Vaughn, S., Swanson, E. A., Roberts, G., & Haynes, M. (2015). Implementing team-based learning in middle school social studies classes. The Journal of Educational Research, 108, 331–344.
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2011). Efficacy of a reading intervention for middle school students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 78, 73–87.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305F100013 to The University of Texas at Austin as part of the Reading for Understanding Research Initiative. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toste, J.R., Vaughn, S., Martinez, L.R. et al. Content-area reading comprehension and teachers’ use of instructional time: effects on middle school students’ social studies knowledge. Read Writ 32, 1705–1722 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9925-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9925-7