Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Amendum, S. J., Conradi, K., & Hiebert, E. (2017). Does text complexity matter in the elementary grades? A research synthesis of text difficulty and elementary students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9398-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading,
18, 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.902461.
Article
Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation,
8, 47–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M., & Haefele-Kalvaitis, J. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
61, 216–241.
Article
Google Scholar
Barth, A. E., Catts, H. W., & Anthony, J. L. (2009). The component skills underlying reading fluency in adolescent readers: A latent variable analysis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
22, 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9125-y.
Article
Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. R package version 1.1-8.
Benjamin, R. G., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2010). Text complexity and oral reading prosody in young readers. Reading Research Quarterly,
45, 388–404.
Article
Google Scholar
Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology,
29, 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951.
Article
Google Scholar
Bowey, J. A. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological sensitivity and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,
87, 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.476.
Article
Google Scholar
Buck, J., & Torgesen, J. (2003). The relationship between performance on a measure of oral reading fluency and performance on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Center for Reading Research.
Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
11, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008084120205.
Article
Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology,
96, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.
Article
Google Scholar
Canty, A. & Ripley, B. (2015). boot: Bootstrap functions. R package version 1.3-17.
Carlisle, J. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology,
24, 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710390227369.
Article
Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,
32, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2001/004).
Article
Google Scholar
Coleman, C., Lindstrom, J., Nelson, W., Lindstrom, W., & Gregg, K. N. (2010). Passageless comprehension on the Nelson–Denny reading test: Well above chance for university students. Journal of Learning Disabilities,
43, 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409345017.
Article
Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review,
108, 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204.
Article
Google Scholar
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: CCSSO & National Governors Association.
Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. W., & Mesmer, H. A. (2014). Quantitative measurement of text difficulty: What’s the use? The Elementary School Journal,
115(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1086/678292.
Article
Google Scholar
Cutting, L., Saha, N., & Hasselbring, T. (2017). U.S. Patent Application No. 62509856. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading,
10, 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5.
Article
Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,
19, 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis–Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Google Scholar
Denckla, M. B. (1989). Executive function, the overlap zone between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities. International Pediatrics,
4, 155–160.
Google Scholar
Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children,
52, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298505200303.
Article
Google Scholar
Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and alternative special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1–17). New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
Article
Google Scholar
Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader–text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology,
104, 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182.
Article
Google Scholar
Eason, S. H., Sabatini, J., Goldberg, L., Bruce, K., & Cutting, L. E. (2013). Examining the relationship between word reading efficiency and oral reading rate in predicting comprehension among different types of readers. Scientific Studies of Reading,
17, 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.652722.
Article
Google Scholar
Edwards-Hewitt, T., & Gray, J. J. (1995). Comparison of measures of socioeconomic status between ethnic groups. Psychological Reports,
77, 699–702. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.699.
Article
Google Scholar
Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading,
17, 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005.
Article
Google Scholar
Engen, L., & Høien, T. (2002). Phonological skills and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing,
15, 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020958105218.
Article
Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
128, 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309.
Article
Google Scholar
English, L., Barnes, M. A., Fletcher, J. M., Dennis, M., & Raghubar, K. P. (2010). Effects of reading goals on reading comprehension, reading rate, and allocation of working memory in children and adolescents with spina bifida meningomyelocele. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,
16, 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617710000123.
Article
Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J., Elmore, J., Hiebert, E. H., Koons, H. H., Bowen, K., Sanford-Moore, E. E., et al. (2016). Examining text complexity in the early grades. Phi Delta Kappan,
97(8), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716647023.
Article
Google Scholar
Frantz, R. S., Starr, L. E., & Bailey, A. L. (2015). Syntactic complexity as an aspect of text complexity. Educational Researcher,
44(7), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x15603980.
Article
Google Scholar
Freebody, P., & Anderson, R. C. (1983). Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly,
18, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/747389.
Article
Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading,
5, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0503_3.
Article
Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Kazdan, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education,
20, 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259902000507.
Article
Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education,
9, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900206.
Article
Google Scholar
García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research,
84, 74–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499616.
Article
Google Scholar
Geiger, J. F., & Millis, K. K. (2004). Assessing the impact of reading goals and text structures on comprehension. Reading Psychology,
25, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490435637.
Article
Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gombert, J. E., & de Barrera, L. F. (1998). Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics,
19, 19–52.
Article
Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,
36, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195564.
Article
Google Scholar
Hackman, D. A., & Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
13, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Hall, C. S. (2016). Inference instruction for struggling readers: A synthesis of intervention research. Educational Psychology Review,
28, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9295-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English. New York, NY: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Hansen, C. L. (1978). Story retelling used with average and learning disabled readers as a measure of reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly,
1, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510938.
Article
Google Scholar
Hiebert, E. H., & Mesmer, H. A. E. (2013). Upping the ante of text complexity in the Common Core State Standards examining its potential impact on young readers. Educational Researcher,
42, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12459802.
Article
Google Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Homack, S., Lee, D., & Riccio, C. A. (2005). Test review: Delis–Kaplan executive function system. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,
22, 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490918444.
Article
Google Scholar
Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
2, 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401799.
Article
Google Scholar
Hosp, M. K., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Using CBM as an indicator of decoding, word reading, and comprehension: Do the relations change with grade? School Psychology Review,
34, 9–26.
Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., & Betjemann, R. S. (2006). Comprehending the gray oral reading test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent items. Scientific Studies of Reading,
10, 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_2.
Article
Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading,
12, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279.
Article
Google Scholar
Keenan, J. M., & Meenan, C. E. (2014). Test differences in diagnosing reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities,
47, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412439326.
Article
Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review,
95, 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.
Article
Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist,
49, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.49.4.294.
Article
Google Scholar
Klecker, B. M. (2006). The gender gap in NAEP fourth-, eighth-, and twelfth-grade reading scores across years. Reading Improvement,
43, 50–56.
Google Scholar
Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Barnes, M., & Fletcher, J. M. (2016). The influence of properties of the test and their interactions with reader characteristics on reading comprehension: An explanatory item response study. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000126.
Article
Google Scholar
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology,
6, 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Loosli, S. V., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2012). Working memory training improves reading processes in typically developing children. Child Neuropsychology,
18, 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2011.575772.
Article
Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., & Inman, W. E. (1993). Effects of signaling topic structure on text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology,
85, 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.281.
Article
Google Scholar
Lyon, G. R. (1998). Why reading is not a natural process. Educational Leadership,
55(6), 14–18.
Google Scholar
Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
12, 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008136012492.
Article
Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction,
14, 1–43.
Article
Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology,
49, 270–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028228.
Article
Google Scholar
Mesmer, H. A., Cunningham, J. W., & Hiebert, E. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly,
47, 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.019.
Article
Google Scholar
Meyers, J. L., & Beretvas, N. (2006). The impact of inappropriate modeling of cross-classified data structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research,
41, 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4104_3.
Article
Google Scholar
Miller, A. C., Davis, N., Gilbert, J. K., Cho, S. J., Toste, J. R., Street, J., et al. (2014). Novel approaches to examine passage, student, and questions effects on reading comprehension. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,
29, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12027.
Article
Google Scholar
Miller, A. C., & Keenan, J. M. (2009). How word reading skill impacts text memory: The centrality deficit and how domain knowledge can compensate. Annals of Dyslexia,
59, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0025-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale,
47, 360–374.
Article
Google Scholar
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language,
39, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2564.
Article
Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The nation’s report card: Reading 2009 (NCES 2010–458). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). National assessment of educational progress (NAEP), 2013 mathematics and reading assessments. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). NAEP 2015 reading: A report card for the nation and the states. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Google Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institutes of Health: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
Google Scholar
O’Connor, R. E., Bell, K. M., Harty, K. R., Larkin, L. K., Sackor, S. M., & Zigmond, N. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology,
94, 474–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.474.
Article
Google Scholar
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes,
18, 443–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008.
Article
Google Scholar
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology,
98, 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554.
Article
Google Scholar
Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition & Instruction,
25, 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632371.
Article
Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In P. Hagoort & C. M. Brown (Eds.), Neurocognition of language processing (pp. 167–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher,
58, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.6.2.
Article
Google Scholar
Priebe, S. J., Keenan, J. M., & Miller, A. C. (2012). How prior knowledge affects word identification and comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
25, 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9260-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., & Lopez, D. (2015). Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A latent change score modeling study. Child Development,
86, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12292.
Article
Google Scholar
Ready, R. E., Chaudhry, M. F., Schatz, K. C., & Strazzullo, S. (2013). “Passageless” administration of the Nelson–Denny reading comprehension test: Associations with IQ and reading skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities,
46, 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412468160.
Article
Google Scholar
Reed, D. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K–12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,
23, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00261.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Chan, H., & Temple, J. A. (1998). Early childhood intervention and juvenile delinquency: An exploratory analysis of the Chicago child-parent centers. Evaluation Review,
22, 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9802200302.
Article
Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2002). Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago child-parent centers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
24, 267–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024004267.
Article
Google Scholar
Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly,
42, 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.42.4.5.
Article
Google Scholar
Saenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education,
23(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250202300105.
Article
Google Scholar
Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students’ verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology,
103, 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023731.
Article
Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review,
96, 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523.
Article
Google Scholar
Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology,
15, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802220029.
Article
Google Scholar
Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry,
57, 1301–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.043.
Article
Google Scholar
Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Shinn, M. M., & Shinn, M. R. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: Administration and scoring of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children committee on the prevention of reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2011). Evidence-based interventions for reading and language difficulties: Creating a virtuous circle. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
81, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02014.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2012). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities,
45, 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411402691.
Article
Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading,
10, 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3.
Article
Google Scholar
Thurlow, R., & van den Broek, P. (1997). Automaticity and inference generation. Reading and Writing Quarterly,
13, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130205.
Article
Google Scholar
Torgensen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., & Hudson, R. (2006). Reading fluency: critical issues for struggling readers. In S. J. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.), Reading fluency: The forgotten dimension of reading success. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Google Scholar
Tuinman, J. J. (1974). Determining the passage dependency of comprehension questions in 5 major tests. Reading Research Quarterly,
9, 206–223.
Article
Google Scholar
van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory and Cognition,
29, 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206376.
Article
Google Scholar
van den Noortgate, W., de Boeck, P., & Meulders, M. (2003). Cross-classification multilevel logistic models in psychometrics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,
28, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986028004369.
Article
Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Von Stumm, S., & Plomin, R. (2015). Socioeconomic status and the growth of intelligence from infancy through adolescence. Intelligence,
48, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.10.002.
Article
Google Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation for reading comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
49, 51–79.
Article
Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Google Scholar
Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., & Reutebuch, C. K. (2008). A synthesis of fluency interventions for secondary struggling readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
21, 317–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9085-7.
Article
Google Scholar
Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1992). Test of word knowledge (TOWK). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Google Scholar
Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
24, 1131–1161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131.
Article
Google Scholar
Zvonik, E. & Cummins, F. (2003). The effect of surrounding phrase lengths on pause duration. In Eighth European conference on speech communication and technology (Vol. 82, pp. 176–193). https://doi.org/10.2307/329207