Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 173–183 | Cite as

A preliminary exploration of uppercase letter-name knowledge among students with significant cognitive disabilities

  • Claire W. GreerEmail author
  • Karen A. Erickson
Article

Abstract

There are several factors known to impact the alphabet knowledge of young children without disabilities. The impact of these factors on the alphabet knowledge of students with significant cognitive disabilities is unknown. The purpose of this preliminary investigation was to explore the impact of three factors that might influence uppercase alphabet knowledge among students with significant cognitive disabilities: own name, letter order in the alphabet string, and letter frequency. Archival data documenting identification of each of the 26 uppercase letters of the alphabet for 131 8- to 21-year-old students were analyzed using a multilevel logistic regression model. While the use of extant data has limitations, results indicated that own-name advantage gave students a 10% greater likelihood of knowing the first letter of their own first name/nickname than any other alphabet letter. Letter-order analysis showed there were differences between letters found earlier in the alphabet string versus those that were found later in the alphabet string; however, the results were not statistically significant. Letter-frequency analysis did not reveal a significant impact of frequency on letter name knowledge in this sample. The findings provide preliminary evidence that at least some of the factors that influence alphabet knowledge in young children without disabilities also impact students with significant cognitive disabilities and point to the need for more research in this area.

Keywords

Significant cognitive disabilities Alphabet knowledge Literacy Own-name advantage Letter-order hypothesis Letter-frequency hypothesis 

References

  1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allor, J., Mathes, P., Roberts, J., Cheatham, J., & Champlin, T. (2010). Comprehensive reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Findings from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 445–466. doi: 10.1002/pits.20482.Google Scholar
  3. Bowman, M., & Treiman, R. (2004). Stepping stones to reading. Theory Into Practice, 43(4), 295–303. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4304_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browder, D., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Courtade, G., Gibbs, S. L., & Flowers, C. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75(1), 33–52. doi: 10.1177/001440290807500102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408. doi: 10.1177/001440290607200401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiappe, P., Siegel, L. S., & Gottardo, A. (2002). Reading related skills of kindergartners from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 95–116. doi: 10.1017/S014271640200005X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clay, M. (2005). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Auckland: Pearson.Google Scholar
  8. Durando, J. (2008). A survey on literacy instruction for students with multiple disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 40–45. http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pubjvib.asp?DocID=jvib1001toc
  9. Erickson, K. (2013). Who are students with significant cognitive disabilities?. Lawrence, KS: Center for Educational Evaluation and Testing.Google Scholar
  10. Erickson, K., & Geist, L. (2016). The profiles of students with significant cognitive disabilities and complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(3), 187–197. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2016.1213312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erickson, K., Hanser, G., Hatch, P., & Sanders, E. (2009). Research-based practices for creating access to the general curriculum in reading and literacy for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2009/Research_Based_Practices_Reading_2009.pdf
  12. Evans, M., Bell, M., Shaw, D., Moretti, S., & Page, J. (2006). Letter names, letter sounds, and phonological awareness: An examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children. Reading and Writing, 19, 959–989. doi: 10.1007/s11145-006-9026-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finnegan, E. (2012). Two approaches to phonics instruction: Comparison of effects with children with significant cognitive disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(3), 269–279. http://daddcec.org/Publications/ETADDJournal.aspx
  14. Foulin, N. J. (2005). Why is letter name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129–155. doi: 10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammill, D. D. (2004). What we know about correlates of reading. Exceptional Children, 70, 453–468. http://ecx.sagepub.com/
  16. Jones, M., & Mewhort, D. (2004). Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 388–396. doi: 10.3758/BF03195586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Justice, L. M., Pence, K., Bowles, R. B., & Wiggins, A. (2006). An investigation of four hypotheses concerning the order by which 4-year-old children learn the alphabet letters. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 374–389. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McBride-Chang, C. (1999, April). The ABCs of the ABCs: The development of letter name and letter-sound knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 285–308. http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/mpq/
  19. National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Retrieved on October 7, 2014 from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/documents/NELPReport09.pdf.
  20. Ricci, L. L. (2011). Home literacy environments, interest in reading and emergent literacy skills of children with Down syndrome versus typical children. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55, 596–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01415.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruppar, A. L., Dymond, S. K., & Gaffney, J. S. (2011). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3/4), 100–111. doi: 10.2511/027494811800824435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2001). The role of family and home in the literacy development of children from low-income backgrounds. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 92, 53–71. doi: 10.1002/cd.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Towles-Reeves, E., Kearns, J., Flowers, C., Hart, L., Kerbel, A., Kleinert, H., et al. (2012). Learner characteristics inventory project report (A product of the NCSC validity evaluation). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.ncscpartners.org/media/default/pdfs/lci-project-report-08-21-12.pdf
  24. Towles-Reeves, E., Kearns, J., Kleinert, H., & Kleinert, J. (2009). An analysis of the learning characteristics of students taking alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. Journal of Special Education, 42, 241–254. doi: 10.1177/0022466907313451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Treiman, R., & Broderick, V. (1998). What’s in a name? Children’s knowledge about the letters in their own names. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 97–116. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 31, pp. 105–135). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Pollo, T. C. (2006). Learning about the letter name subset of the vocabulary: Evidence from US and Brazilian preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 211–227. doi: 10.1017/S0142716406060255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Treiman, R., Pennington, B. F., Shriberg, L. D., & Boada, R. (2008). Which children benefit from letter names in learning letter sounds? Cognition, 106, 1322–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Treiman, R., & Rodriguez, K. (1999). Young children use letter names in learning to read words. Psychological Science, 10, 334–338. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turnbull, K., Bowles, R. P., Skibbe, L. E., Justice, L. M., & Wiggins, A. K. (2010). Theoretical explanations for preschoolers’ lowercase alphabet knowledge. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 53, 1757–1768. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2002/index.html
  32. van der Schuit, M., Peeters, M., Segers, H., van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Home literacy environment of pre-school children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(12), 1024–1037. doi: 10.1111/j.1365.2788.2009.01222.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Villaume, S. K., & Wilson, L. C. (1989). Preschool children’s explorations of letters in their own names. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 283–300. doi: 10.1017/s0142716400008638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Literacy and Disability Studies, Department of Allied Health SciencesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations