Abstract
In the present study, we examined the role of morphological awareness in reading and spelling performance across three languages varying in orthographic consistency (English, French, and Greek), after controlling for the effects of phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming (RAN). One hundred fifty-nine English-speaking Canadian, 238 French-speaking Canadian, and 224 Greek children were assessed at the beginning of Grade 2 on measures of morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and RAN. At the end of Grade 2, they were assessed on reading accuracy, reading fluency, reading comprehension, and spelling to dictation. The results indicated that morphological awareness was a unique predictor of reading comprehension and spelling in all three languages, of reading fluency in English and French, and of reading accuracy in English only. Furthermore, the results of multigroup analyses revealed no significant differences in the contribution of morphological awareness to the literacy outcomes across languages. Theoretical and practical implications of these finding are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A common estimate of orthographic transparency is the entropy index based on letter-to-sound mappings. The lower the entropy index is the more transparent the orthography is. The estimate of this index is .83 for English, .46 for French (Ziegler et al., 2010), and .16 for Greek (Protopapas & Vlachou, 2009).
The negative variance of the first indicator of the reading accuracy latent variable had to be fixed at 0 in the French group, thus resulting in a model with 47 degrees of freedom. This constraint did not result in a significant decrement in the model fit and it was deemed necessary to ensure the identification of the measurement model.
The fit of this model was identical to the measurement model because it estimated all relationships between the predictors and the outcomes. However, as in a multiple regression, this model estimated the effect of a predictor when holding constant the effect of the other predictors.
We calculated the change in R² to estimate the unique/incremental variance explained by morphological awareness. We tested a first model in which the effects of the covariates were freely estimated but the effect of morphological awareness was fixed to zero (i.e., equivalent to the first step in a hierarchical regression). We tested a second model (equivalent to the second step of a hierarchical regression) in which both the effects of the covariates and morphological awareness were freely estimated. Therefore, the unique/incremental variance explained by morphological awareness (R² change) is obtained with this formula: R² of model 2 minus R² of model 1. Results of the second model are presented in Tables 4 and 5. All results from the first model are available upon request.
The fit of this model corresponds to the sum of MLRχ 2 for the model previously estimated in each of the three language groups.
References
Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C. V., & Burani, C. (2014). The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: A study on Italian children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01373.
Anglin, J. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1–186.
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in Grade 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6.
Berthiaume, R., Besse, A.-S., & Daigle, D. (2010). L’évaluation de la conscience morphologique: proposition d’une typologie des tâches. Language Awareness, 19, 153–170. doi:10.1080/09658416.2010.482992.
Booij, G. (2012). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Aidinis, A. (1999). Different morphemes, same spelling problems: Cross-linguistic developmental studies. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write (pp. 112–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bryant, P., Nunes, T., & Bindman, M. (2000). The relations between children’s linguistic awareness and spelling: The case of the apostrophe. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 253–276.
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Defior, S., Seidlová Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398–1407. doi:10.1177/0956797612473122.
Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavský, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E., et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678–686. doi:10.1177/0956797611434536.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–253.
Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195. doi:10.1017/S0142716400009541.
Casalis, S., Deacon, S. H., & Pacton, S. (2011). How specific is the connection between morphological awareness and spelling? A study of French children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 499–511. doi:10.1017/S014271641100018X.
Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 303–335.
Chliounaki, K., & Bryant, P. (2007). How children learn about morphological spelling rules. Child Development, 78, 1360–1373.
Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corporation, E. (2012). DirectRT research software (v2012). New York: Empirisoft.
Cunningham, A. J., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Early predictors of phonological and morphological awareness and the link with reading: Evidence from children with different patterns of early deficit. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 509–531. doi:10.1017/S0142716413000295.
Deacon, S. H. (2012). Sounds, letters and meanings: The independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 456–475. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010D.0E1A4C9O6.Nx.
Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi:10.1017.S0124716404001117.
Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., & Casselman-Bell, M. (2009). How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes? Reading Psychology, 30, 301–318. doi:10.1080/02702710802412057.
Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength or a weakness? In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 212–237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Deacon, S. H., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. (2007). Crossover: The role of morphological awareness in French immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43, 732–746. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.732.
Desrochers, A. (2012a). ÉCOLE: évaluation de la compétence en lecture. Unpublished test battery, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Desrochers, A. (2012b). French adaptation of the Passage Comprehension Test—Woodcock (1998). Experimental version, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Duncan, L. G., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). Early metalinguistic awareness of derivational morphology: Observations from a comparison of English and French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 405. doi:10.1017/S0142716409090213.
Georgiou, G., Manolitsis, G., Nurmi, J.-E., & Parrila, R. (2010). Does task-focused versus task avoidance behavior matter for literacy development in an orthographically consistent language? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 1–10.
Georgiou, G., Papadopoulos, T. C., Fella, A., & Parrila, R. (2012a). Rapid naming speed components and reading development in a consistent orthography. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 1–17.
Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency in English and Greek: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566–580. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.566.
Georgiou, G. K., & Stewart, B. (2013). Is rapid automatized naming automatic? Preschool and Primary Education, 1, 67–81.
Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Manolitsis, G., Lyytinen, H., & Parrila, R. (2012b). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25, 321–346. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x.
Grigorakis, I. (2014). The development of children’s metamorphological abilities from Kindergarten to Grade 2 and its relationship with reading and spelling acquisition. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.
Grigorakis, I., & Manolitsis, G. (2016). Η συμβολή της μορφολογικής επίγνωσης στα πρώτα στάδια ανάπτυξης της ικανότητας ορθογραφημένης γραφής [The contribution of morphological awareness on the early stages of spelling development]. Preschool and Primary Education, 4, 128–148. doi:10.12681/ppej.8581.
Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determinants for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373–388.
Holton, D., Mackridge, P., & Philippaki-Warburton, I. (2004). Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the modern language. London: Routledge.
Kalamboukis, T. Z. (1995). Suffix stripping with Modern Greek. Program, 29, 313–321. doi:10.1108/eb047204.
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 389–410. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5.
Kuo, L.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3.
Lei, P.-W., & Wu, Q. (2012). Estimation in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 164–180). New York: Guilford.
Lethonen, A., & Bryant, P. (2005). Active players or just passive bystanders? The role of morphemes in spelling development in a transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 137–155. doi:10.1017/s0142716405050113.
Manolitsis, G. (2006). Η σχέση της μορφολογικής επίγνωσης με την αναγνωστική ικανότητα κατά τα πρώτα στάδια ανάπτυξής της [The relation of morphological awareness with early reading ability]. In D. Koutsogianis, A. Haralabopoulos, & N. Liosis (Eds.), Studies in Greek linguistics. Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Department of Linguistics. Faculty of Philosophy. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (pp. 282–293), Thessaloniki.
Manolitsis, G., & Grigorakis, I. (2012). How specific is the role of morphological awareness in beginning reading and spelling? Paper presented at the 19th Conference of Scientific Studies of Reading, 12–14 July, Montreal, Canada.
Mouzaki, A., Protopapas, A., Sideridis, G., & Simos, P. (2010). Μια δοκιμασία για την αξιολόγηση της ορθογραφίας [A test for spelling evaluation]. In A. Mouzaki, & A. Protopapas (Eds.), Spelling. Learning & Disorders (pp. 326–347). Athens: Gutenberg.
Müller, K., & Brady, S. (2001). Correlates of early reading performance in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 757–799.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). The number of words in printed school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–440.
Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.14.
Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 3–12. doi:10.1177/0022219413509967.
Nunes, T., Aidinis, A., & Bryant, P. (2006). The acquisition of written morphology in Greek. In R. Malatesha Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 201–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. London: Routledge.
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.
Papadopoulos, T. C. (2001). Phonological and cognitive correlates of word-reading acquisition under two different instructional approaches in Greek. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 549–568.
Peereman, R., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Messaoud-Galusi, S. (2013). The contribution of morphology to the consistency of spelling-to-sound relations: A quantitative analysis based on French elementary school readers. L’Année Psychologique, 113, 3–33. doi:10.4074/S0003503313001012.
Pittas, E., & Nunes, T. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading and spelling in Greek: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 27, 1507–1527. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9503-6.
Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2004). Predictive influence of phonological processing, morphological/syntactic skill, and naming speed on spelling. Brain and Language, 55, 368–373.
Protopapas, A., Altani, A., & Georgiou, G. K. (2013). Development of serial processing in reading and rapid naming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 914–929.
Protopapas, A., & Vlahou, E. (2009). A comparative quantitative analysis of Greek orthographic transparency. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 991–1008. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.991.
Rispens, J., McBride-Chang, C., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphologial awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch. Reading and Writing, 21, 587–607.
Rothou, K. M., & Padeliadu, S. (2015). Inflectional morphological awareness and word reading and reading comprehension in Greek. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1007–1027. doi:10.1017/S0142716414000022.
Ruan, Y., George, G., Song, S., Li, Y., & Shu, H. (2017). Does writing system influence the association between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and reading? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1037/edu0000216.
Sanchez, M., Magnan, A., & Ecalle, J. (2012). Knowledge about word structure in beginning readers: What specific links are there with word reading and spelling? Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 299–317. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0071-8.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192.
Seigneuric, A., Zagar, D., Meunier, F., & Spinelli, E. (2007). The relation between language and cognition in 3- to 9-year olds: The acquisition of grammatical gender in French. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 229–246. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.003.
Sénéchal, M. (2000). Morphological effects in children’s spelling of French words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 76–86.
Sénéchal, M., Basque, M. T., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children's spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.
Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.
Tighe, E. L., & Schatscheider, C. (2015). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological awareness and its relations to vocabulary knowledge in adult basic education students. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 293–311. doi:10.1002/rrq.102.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.
Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler individual achievement test—Second edition (WIAT-II). New York: Pearson.
Wechsler, D. (2005). Test de rendement individuel de Wechsler (WIAT-II CDN-F). Toronto: Pearson Canada Assessment.
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). New York, NY: Guilford.
Wolter, J., Wood, A., & D’zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing in Schools, 40, 286–298. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0001).
Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test-revised-normative update examiner’s manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Reis, A., Faísca, L., et al. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559. doi:10.1177/0956797610363406.
Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency in spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 504–515.
Ziegler, J. C., & Stone, G. O. (1997). What is the pronunciation of –ough and the spelling for/u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 600–618.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant to the last author (Grant No. RES0002344). We thank all school boards, school principals, teachers, children, and research assistants for their collaboration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Gaudreau, P. et al. Early contribution of morphological awareness to literacy skills across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Read Writ 31, 1695–1719 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9772-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9772-y