Skip to main content
Log in

The roles of handwriting and keyboarding in writing: a meta-analytic review

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to the simple view of writing (Berninger, Abbott, Abbott, Graham, & Richards, 2002), the two important components of transcription in writing are handwriting and keyboarding, the third one being spelling. The purpose of this paper is to review the contribution of two writing modes—handwriting and keyboarding to writing performance. In the first section, the contribution of handwriting fluency to writing performance was explored through moderator analyses. We found that handwriting fluency contributes to writing significantly and consistently, and significantly contributes to specific writing measures (e.g., writing quality, writing fluency, substantive quality). We then explored the relationship between handwriting and keyboarding, and compared their contributions to writing. Results indicated that performance on fluency of handwriting and keyboarding were significantly related, particularly on speed. Writing qualities under each mode were relatively competitive; however, keyboarding allows for faster writing. The findings from the two sections emphasized the importance of handwriting on writing development even though keyboarding is accessible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediate-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Babayigit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 539–568. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, A., Stainthorp, R., Henderson, S., & Scheib, B. (2006). Handwriting policy and practice in English primary schools. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E. (2009). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 185–200. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. (2000). Development of language by hand and its connections with language by ear, mouth, and eye. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 65–84. doi:10.1097/00011363-200020040-00007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 39–56. doi:10.1177/002221940203500104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Augsburger, A., & Garcia, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 123–141. doi:10.2307/27740364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., et al. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 61–92. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Thomson, J. B., & Raskind, W. H. (2001). Language phenotype for reading and writing disability: A family approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 59–106. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0501_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Amtmann, D. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems. Research into practice. In H. L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A. C., Yates, C. M., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 161–196. doi:10.1007/BF01026911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Graham, S. (1998). Language by hand: A synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting. Handwriting Review, 12, 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Mizokawa, D. T., & Bragg, R. (1991). The theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57–79. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(91)90016-K.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In E. C. Butterfield (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, vol. 2: Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57–82). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Brooks, A., Rogan, L., et al. (1997). Treatment of handwriting fluency problems in beginning writing: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 652–666. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Berninger, V. W., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. D. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257–280. doi:10.1007/BF01027151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2 [software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M. (1988). Comparison of typing and handwriting in “two-finger typists”. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 32, 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Christensen, C. A. (2004). Relationship between orthographic-motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well-structured written text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 551–564. doi:10.1348/0007099042376373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. A. (2009). The critical role handwriting plays in the ability to produce high-quality written text. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 284–299). London: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479–492. doi:10.1348/000709906X116768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinehart, L. H. (2015). Handwriting in early childhood education: Current research and future implications. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15, 97–118. doi:10.1177/1468798414522825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). The contribution of executive functions to narrative writing in fourth grade children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9558-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. doi:10.2307/2669529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 312–317. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74–111. doi:10.3102/0034654313499616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D., & Raij, D. (1988). Typing with a two-handed chord keyboard: Will the QWERTY become obsolete? IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1986). A review of handwriting scales and factors that contribute to variability in handwriting scores. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 63–71. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(86)90043-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170–182. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Schafer, W. (1998). Development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1–9. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42–52. doi:10.1080/00220679809597574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Chorzempa, B. F. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–635. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. (2011). Informing writing: The benefits of formative assessment. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Miller, L. (1980). Handwriting research and practice: A unified approach. Focus on Exceptional Children, 13, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Weintraub, N. (1996). A review of handwriting research: Progress and prospects from 1980 to 1994. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 7–87. doi:10.1007/BF01761831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamstra-Bletz, L., & Blote, A. (1993). A longitudinal study on dysgraphic handwriting in primary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 689–699. doi:10.1177/002221949302601007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, S., Shermis, M. D., & Rollins, A. L. (2000). The influence of word processing on English placement test results. Computers and Composition, 17, 197–210. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(00)00029-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65. doi:10.1002/jrsm.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Mercer, C. D. (2005). Writing prompts: The role of various priming conditions on the compositional fluency of developing writers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 473–495. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-7042-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jalbert, R. (2009). Essay quality of adolescents with learning disabilities: Does the medium improve the message? Master’s Thesis, Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (MS26445).

  • *Jones, D., & Christensen, C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44–49. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsdottir, R., & Stefansson, T. (2002). Problems in developing functional handwriting (monograph supplement 1-V94). Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 623–662. doi:10.2466/PMS.94.2.623-662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: A formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37, 1–18. doi:10.21432/T2S598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels: A meta-analysis of the last 25 years. Review of Educational Research, 86, 570–601. doi:10.3102/0034654315619491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1163–1188. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Folsom, J., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 517–525. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kim, Y. S., Park, C. H., & Park, Y. (2013). Is academic language use a separate dimension in beginning writing? Evidence from Korean. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 8–15. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, F. J., Rohani, F., Sanfilippo, C., & White, N. (2008). Effects of handwritten versus computer-written modes of communication on the quality of student essays. Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment (CALA Report).

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. doi:10.1093/applin/aml029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. K. (2004). A comparative study of ESL writers’ performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test. Assessing Writing, 9, 4–26. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-López, J. A., Viechtbauer, W., Sánchez-Meca, J., & Marín-Martínez, F. (2010). Comparing the performance of alternative statistical tests for moderators in mixed-effects meta-regression models. 5th annual meeting of the Society for Research Synthesis Methodology, Cartagena, Spain.

  • Mather, N., & Roberts, R. (1995). Informal assessment and instruction in written language: A practitioner’s guide for students with learning disabilities. Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 299–325. doi:10.1007/BF01464076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13–23. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3501_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256–266. doi:10.1207/sldrp1404_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, K., & Cermak, S. A. (1992). Fine motor activities in elementary school: Preliminary findings and provisional implications for children with fine motor problems. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46, 898–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Medwell, J., Strand, S., & Wray, D. (2009). The links between handwriting and composing for Y6 children. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 329–344. doi:10.1080/03057640903103728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2014). Handwriting automaticity: The search for performance thresholds. Language and Education, 28, 34–51. doi:10.1080/09500782.2013.763819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25, 1159–1168. doi:10.1177/0956797614524581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Olinghouse, N. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 3–26. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9062-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Olinghouse, N. G., & Graham, S. (2009). The relationship between the discourse knowledge and the writing performance of elementary-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 37–50. doi:10.1037/a0013462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Perminger, F., Weiss, P. L., & Weintraub, N. (2004). Predicting occupational performance: Handwriting versus keyboarding. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 193–201. doi:10.5014/ajot.58.2.193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranik, C. S., & AlOtaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1523–1546. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Roger, J., & Case-Smith, J. (2002). Relationships between handwriting and keyboarding performance of sixth-grade students. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 34–39. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.1.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, A. D., Watson, T. E., Footo, M., Levine, M. D., Coleman, W. L., & Hooper, S. R. (1992). Neurodevelopmental study of writing disorders in middle childhood. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2015). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 1–41. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9335-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwabe, G., & Göth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: Design and motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 21, 204–216. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00128.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sormunen, C. (1993). Learning style: An analysis of factors affecting keyboarding achievement of elementary school students. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 35, 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, IBM. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics base 20 [software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudsawad, P. (1999). Teacher referrals of poor handwriting students. Unpublished raw data.

  • Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358–385. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 13–30. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyatkina, N. (2012). The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 576–598. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01401.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wagner, R. K., Puranik, C. S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Wilson, L. G., Tschinkel, E., et al. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24, 203–220. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, L. M., & Hall-Kenyon, K. M. (2011). Improving young children’s writing: The influence of story structure on kindergartners’ writing complexity. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 272–293. doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.514035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Weintraub, N., Gilmour-Grill, N., & Weiss, P. L. (2010). Relationship between handwriting and keyboarding performance among fast and slow adult keyboarders. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 123–132. doi:10.5014/ajot.64.1.123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, N., & Graham, S. (2000). The contribution of gender, orthographic, finger function, and visual-motor processes to the prediction of handwriting status. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 20, 121–140. doi:10.1177/153944920002000203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. M. (2000). A marriage waiting to happen: Computers and process writing. Boston, MA: Education Development Center. Retrieved from http://www-tc.pbs.org/teacherline/courses/rdla215/docs/wood_marriagewaiting.pdf.

  • Yamamato, K. (2007). Banning laptops in the classroom: Is it worth the hassle? Journal of Legal Education, 57, 477–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Yan, C., McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Zhang, J., Wong, A., & Shu, H. (2012). Writing quality in Chinese children: Speed and fluency matter. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1499–1521. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9330-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Mark Shum, S. K., Brian Tse, S. K., & Liu, J. J. (2016). Word-processor or pencil-and-paper? A comparison of students’ writing in Chinese as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 596–617. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.1000932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luxi Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, L., Lindner, A., Ji, X.R. et al. The roles of handwriting and keyboarding in writing: a meta-analytic review. Read Writ 32, 33–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9749-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9749-x

Keywords

Navigation