Abstract
The National Institutes of Health has deemed illiteracy a national health crisis based on reading proficiency rates among American children. In 2002, the National Early Literacy Panel identified six pre-reading skills that are most crucial precursors to reading mastery and predict future reading outcomes. Of those skills, phonological awareness, and in particular phonemic awareness, is the strongest independent predictor of early reading outcomes. However, limited research has addressed the development of these component skills due in part to the fact that many of the measures used to assess sub-skills such as phonemic awareness are oral production measures that cannot easily be administered with children under the age of five, and are not designed to detect implicit or emerging knowledge. To address this limitation, we developed and administered two receptive measures of phonemic awareness to 2.5- and 3.5-year-old children. We found evidence for the emergence of this component skill earlier in ontogeny than is currently acknowledged in the literature. Overall, children performed at above chance rates on measures of receptive phonemic awareness at the level of the individual phoneme as early as 2.5-years-old. Results are discussed in terms of the need for a paradigm shift in prevailing models of how phonological awareness develops, as well as the potential to identify children at-risk for reading failure at an earlier point in ontogeny than is currently feasible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthony, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 53–55.
Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., & Burgess, S. R. (2003). Phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 470–487.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1981). Visual memory and phonological skills in reading and spelling backwardness. Psychological Research, 43(2), 193–199.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A Causal connection. Nature, 30, 419–421.
Cardillo, G. C. (2010). Predicting the predictors: Individual differences in longitudinal relationships between infant phonetic perception, toddler vocabulary, and preschooler language and phonological awareness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71(10) B. (UMI No: 3421541). Retrieved August 20, 2011 from Dissertation and Theses database.
Castles, A., Wilson, K., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early orthographic influences on phonemic awareness tasks: Evidence from a preschool training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 203–210.
Catts, H. W., & Hogan, T. P. (2003). Language basis of reading disabilities and implications for early identification and remediation. Reading Psychology, 24(3–4), 223–246.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Children’s literacy environments and early word recognition skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 193–204.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 331–342.
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Goodman, I., Libenson, A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2010). Sensitivity to linguistic stress, phonological awareness, and early reading ability in preschoolers. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 113–127.
Goswami, U. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuhl, P. K., Conboy, B. T., Padden, D., Nelson, T., & Pruitt, J. (2005). Early speech perception and later language development: Implications for the ‘critical period’. Language Learning and Development, 1(3–4), 273–264.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankwiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.
Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., Anthony, J. L., & Barker, T. A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 294–311.
Metsala, J. L. (1999). The development of phonemic awareness in learning disabled children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(1), 149–158.
Moats, L. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 35, 293–310.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (2015). The Nation’s Report Card: 2015 Mathematics and reading assessments. (Report No. NCES 2015136). Retrieved February 5, 2016 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015136.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS. (2010). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel (NA). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read (Report No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Scarborough, H. S. (1989). Prediction of reading dysfunction from familial and individual differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 101–108.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 175–190.
Verhagen, W. G. M., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van Leeuwe, J. F. J. (2009). The predictive power of phonemic awareness and naming speed for early Dutch word recognition. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 93–116.
Wackerle-Hollman, A. K., Schmitt, B. A., Bradfield, T. A., Rodriguez, M. C., & McConnell, S. R. (2015). Redefining individual growth and development indicators: Phonological awareness. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(5), 495–510.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgeson, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological awareness and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (2002). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 121–133.
Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2000). Supporting phonemic awareness development in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 130–143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Word lists: receptive phoneme blending and segmenting measures
Blending task stimuli
Training auditory stimuli | Training picture pair stimuli |
---|---|
/g//ʌ//m/ | Gum, watch |
/p//ɒ//t/ | Pot, door |
Test trial stimuli lists
Initial phoneme lists | Final phoneme lists | ||
---|---|---|---|
Target auditory stimulus | Picture pair stimuli | Target auditory stimulus | Picture pair stimuli |
/s/ɒ/k/ | Sock, lock | /k/aʊ/tʃ/ | Couch, cows |
/w/ɪə//l/ | Seal, wheel | /k/eɪ/k/ | Cake, cage |
/k/æ/n/ | Can, fan | /d/ɒ/l/ | Dog, doll |
/f/ɪ/ʃ/ | Dish, fish | /b/ɪə/tʃ/ | Beach, beak |
/k/æ/t/ | Cat, bat | /k/əʊ/m/ | Comb, coat |
/h/əʊ/z/ | Hose, nose | /m/eɪ/l/ | Man, mail |
/w/ʌ/n | One, sun | /b/əʊ/l/ | Bowl, boat |
/g/uː/s/ | Goose, juice | /b/ʌ/s/ | Bus, bug |
Segmenting task stimuli
Training auditory stimuli | Training picture stimuli |
---|---|
/w//ɒ//tʃ/ ; /g//ʌ//m/ | Gum or watch |
/p/ /ɒ/ /t/ ; /d/ɔː/ | Pot or door |
Test trial stimuli lists
Initial phoneme trials | Final phoneme trials | ||
---|---|---|---|
Target auditory stimuli | Picture stimulus | Target auditory stimuli | Picture stimulus |
/h/əʊ/z/; /n/əʊ/z/ | Hose or nose | /k/əʊ/m/; /k/əʊ/t/ | Comb or coat |
/w/ʌ//n/; /s/ʌ/n/ | One or sun | /b/ʌ/g/; /b/ʌ/s/ | Bus or bug |
/k/æ/t/; /b//æ//t/ | Cat or bat | /b/əʊ/t/; b/əʊ/l | Boat or bowl |
/g/uː/s/; /ʤ/uː/s/ | Goose or juice | /m/eɪ/l/; /m/eə/n/ | Mail or man |
/k/æ/n/; /f/æ/n/ | Can or fan | /d/ɒ/g/; /d/ɒ/l/ | Dog or doll |
/f/ɪ/ʃ/; /d/ɪ/ʃ/ | Fish or dish | /k/aʊ/tʃ/; /k/aʊ/z/ | Couch or cows |
/l/ɒ/k/; /s/ɒ/k/ | Lock or sock | /b/ɪə/tʃ/; /b/ɪə/k/ | Beach or beak |
/w/ɪə/l/; /s/ɪə/l/ | Wheel or seal | /k/eɪ/k/; /k/eɪ/ʤ/ | Cake or cage |
Appendix 2
See Fig. 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kenner, B.B., Terry, N.P., Friehling, A.H. et al. Phonemic awareness development in 2.5- and 3.5-year-old children: an examination of emergent, receptive, knowledge and skills. Read Writ 30, 1575–1594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9738-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9738-0