Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 653–690 | Cite as

A comparison of schools: teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction

  • Rebecca A. Cohen
  • Nancy Mather
  • Deborah A. Schneider
  • Jennifer M. White
Article

Abstract

One-hundred-fourteen kindergarten through third-grade teachers from seven different schools were surveyed using The Survey of Preparedness and Knowledge of Language Structure Related to Teaching Reading to Struggling Students. The purpose was to compare their definitions and application knowledge of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts, as well as their perceptions of their own knowledge as operationalized in a scale designed to measure participants’ confidence in their responses. Participants were divided into groups based on their districts’ use or non-use of a scripted, code-based reading program. The code-based reading program group comprised 60 teacher participants, and the no code-based reading program group comprised 54 participants. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed no significant differences between groups in definitions or application knowledge, once demographic differences were accounted for. Analyses of covariance revealed no significant differences in perceptions of knowledge after accounting for relevant covariates. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the variance contribution of condition and demographic variables to obtained knowledge to be non-significant, and partial correlation analyses showed only weak, often non-significant correlations between perceived knowledge and obtained knowledge. Overall poor survey performance indicated that the majority of teachers in both conditions did not possess the necessary code-based reading knowledge or application skills to effectively teach struggling readers. The results of this study suggest that the use of a scripted, code-based reading program does not guarantee mastery of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts.

Keywords

Teacher knowledge Reading Teacher preparation Code-based reading programs 

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2014). Education and socioeconomic status fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/factsheet-education.aspx
  2. Binks-Cantrell, E., Washburn, E. K., Joshi, M. R., & Hougen, M. (2012). Peter effect in the preparation of reading teachers. Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 16, 527–536. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.601434 Google Scholar
  3. Bos, C., Mather, N., Dickson, S., Podhajski, B., & Chard, D. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice educators about early reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 97–120. doi: 10.1007/s11881-001-0007-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bos, C. S., Mather, N., Narr, R., & Babur, N. (1999). Interactive, collaborative professional development in early literacy instruction: Supporting the balancing act. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 227–238. doi: 10.1207/sldrp1404_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., et al. (2009). First grade teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing, 22, 425–455. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9166-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, S., & Moats, L. C. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success—Foundations for teacher preparation. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association, A Position Paper of the International Dyslexia Association.Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of k-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139–167. doi: 10.1007/s11881-004-0007-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham, A. E., Zibulsky, J., & Callahan, M. D. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports early literacy development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 487–510. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9164-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation. (2012). What will it take to help more children with dyslexia learn to read proficiently?. New Haven, CT: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). The case for early reading intervention. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 243–264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 203–212. doi: 10.1111/0938-8982.00020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability a longitudinal, individual growth curves study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. International Dyslexia Association. (2010). Knowledge and practice standards for teachers of reading. Baltimore, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Joshi, R. M., Binks, E., Graham, L., Ocker-Dean, E., Smith, D. L., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2009). Do textbooks used in university reading education courses conform to the instructional recommendations of the national reading panel? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 458–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joshi, R. M., Washburn, E. K., & Kahn-Horwitz, J. (2016). Introduction to the special issue on teacher knowledge from an international perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s11881-015-0119-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2007). Breaking words down to build meaning: Vocabulary, morphology, and reading comprehension in the urban classroom. The Reading Teacher, 61, 134–144. doi: 10.1598/RT.61.2.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lose, M. K. (2007). A child’s response to intervention requires a responsive teacher of reading. Reading Teacher, 61, 276–279. doi: 10.1598/RT.61.3.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyon, G. R. (1998). Why reading is not natural. Educational Leadership, 3, 14–18.Google Scholar
  19. Lyon, G. R. (1999). The NICHD research program in reading development, reading disorders and reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Center for Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  20. Lyon, G. R. (2001). Measuring success: Using assessments and accountability to raise student achievement. Hearing before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Subcommittee on Education Reform, 107th Congress. Available at http://www.nrrf.org/lyon_statement3-01.htm
  21. Lyon, G. R. (2009). The NICHD research program in reading development, reading disorders and reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Center for Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
  22. Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mather, N. (1992). Whole language reading instruction for students with learning disabilities: Caught in the crossfire. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 87–94.Google Scholar
  24. Mather, N., Bos, C., & Babur, N. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 472–482. doi: 10.1177/002221940103400508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCombes-Tolis, J., & Feinn, R. (2008). Comparing teachers’ literacy-related knowledge to their state’s standards for reading. Reading Psychology, 29, 236–265. doi: 10.1080/02702710801982258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., et al. (2002a). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 69–86. doi: 10.1177/002221940203500106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCutchen, D., & Berninger, V. (1999). Those who know, teach well: Helping teachers master literacy-related subject-matter knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 215–226. doi: 10.1207/sldrp1404_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCutchen, D., Green, L., Abbott, R. D., & Sanders, E. A. (2009). Further evidence for teacher knowledge: Supporting struggling readers in grades three through five. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 401–423. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9163-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCutchen, D., Harry, D. R., Cox, S., Sidman, S., Covill, A. E., & Cunningham, A. (2002b). Reading teachers’ knowledge of children’s literature and English phonology. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 207–228. doi: 10.1007/s11881-002-0013-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–101. doi: 10.1007/BF02648156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moats, L. C. (1995). The missing foundation in teacher education. American Educator, 19, 43–51.Google Scholar
  32. Moats, L. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.Google Scholar
  33. Moats, L. C. (2000). Whole language lives on: The illusion of “balanced” reading instruction. New York, NY: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Moats, L. C. (2004). Science, language, and imagination in the professional development of reading teachers. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 269–287). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Moats, L. (2009). Knowledge foundations for teaching reading and spelling. Reading and Writing, 22, 379–399. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9162-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moats, L. (2012). Still wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 387–391. doi: 10.1177/0022219409338735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 23–45. doi: 10.1007/s11881-003-0003-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moats, L. C., & Lyon, G. R. (1996). Wanted: Teachers with knowledge of language. Topics in Language Disorders, 16, 73–86. doi: 10.1097/00011363-199602000-00007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). 2015 Mathematics and reading assessments. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#reading/acl?grade=4
  40. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  41. Piasta, S. B., Connor, C., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248. doi: 10.1080/10888430902851364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Podhajski, B., Mather, N., Nathan, J., & Sammons, J. (2009). Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction: Teacher knowledge and reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 403–417. doi: 10.1177/0022219409338737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaywitz, S. E. & Shaywitz, B.A. (2014, January 27). Make dyslexia a national priority [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/196400-make-dyslexia-a-national-priority
  44. Snow, C., Burns, S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  45. Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, S. M. (Eds.). (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, A. O. (2003). Teachers’ acquisition of knowledge about English word structure. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 72–103. doi: 10.1007/s11881-003-0005-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spear-Swerling, L., & Brucker, A. O. (2004). Preparing novice teachers to develop basic reading and spelling skills in children. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 332–364. doi: 10.1007/s11881-004-0016-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spear-Swerling, L., Brucker, P., & Alfano, M. P. (2005). Teachers’ literacy-related knowledge and self-perceptions in relation to preparation and experience. Annals of Dyslexia, 55, 266–296. doi: 10.1007/s11881-005-0014-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spear-Swerling, L., & Cheesman, E. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1691–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spencer, E. J., Schuele, C. M., Guillot, K. M., & Lee, M. W. (2008). Phonemic awareness skill of speech-language pathologists and other educators. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 39, 512–520. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning-disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. K. Torgesen & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on LD (pp. 75–103). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stark, H. L., Snow, P. C., Eadie, P. A., & Goldfield, S. R. (2016). Language and reading instruction in early years’ classrooms: The knowledge and self-rated ability of Australian teachers. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 28–54. doi: 10.1007/s11881-01500112-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  54. Torgesen, J. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64. doi: 10.1207/SLDRP1501_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–593. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R., & Binks-Cantrell, E. (2010). Are preservice teachers prepared to teach struggling readers? Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 21–43. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0040-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Washburn, E. K., Joshi, R., & Binks-Cantrell, E. S. (2011). Teacher knowledge of basic language concepts and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 17, 165–183. doi: 10.1002/dys.426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williamson, E. G. (1939). Reading disabilities. In E. G. Williamson (Ed.), How to counsel students: A manual of techniques for clinical counselors (pp. 327–347). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson Reading Systems. (2012). Fundations: Wilson language basics K-3. Oxford, MA: Wilson Language Training.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca A. Cohen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nancy Mather
    • 1
  • Deborah A. Schneider
    • 1
  • Jennifer M. White
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Disability and Psychoeducational StudiesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Pima Community CollegeTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations