Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika,
38, 123–140. doi:10.1007/BF02291180.
Article
Google Scholar
Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
143, 473–479. doi:10.1037/a0033297.
Article
Google Scholar
Chokron, S., Bartolomeo, P., Perenin, M. T., Helft, G., & Imbert, M. (1998). Scanning direction and line bisection: A study of normal subjects and unilateral neglect patients with opposite reading habits. Cognitive Brain Research,
7, 173–178. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00022-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (2000). Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. Cognitive Brain Research,
10, 45–49. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00021-5.
Article
Google Scholar
Christophe, A., Millotte, S., Bernal, S., & Lidz, J. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Speech,
51, 61–75. doi:10.1177/00238309080510010501.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C., & Beale, I. L. (1976). The psychology of left and right. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Cornell, J. (1985). Spontaneous mirror-writing in children. Canadian Journal of Psychology,
39, 174–179. doi:10.1037/h0080122.
Article
Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2010). Reading in the brain. New York, NY: Penguin Viking.
Google Scholar
Erickson, L. C., & Thiessen, E. D. (2015). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Developmental Review,
37, 66–108. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.002.
Article
Google Scholar
Fischer, J. P. (2010). Vers une levée du mystère des écritures en miroir (des chiffres) chez l’enfant [Digit mirror-writing in children: Towards an unlocking of the mystery]. L’année psychologique,
110, 227–251. doi:10.4074/S0003503310002034.
Article
Google Scholar
Fischer, J. P. (2013). Digit reversal in children’s writing: A simple theory and its empirical validation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
115, 356–370. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Fischer, J. P., & Koch, A. M. (2014). La magie computationnelle de la voie ventrale est-elle à l’origine de l’inversion des lettres et des chiffres chez l’enfant de cinq à six ans ? [Does the reversal of the letters and digits by the five to six-year-old child originate in the computational magic of the ventral stream?]. Revue de Neuropsychologie,
6, 230–237. doi:10.1684/nrp.2014.0318.
Google Scholar
Fischer, J. P., & Koch, A. M. (2016a). Mirror writing in 5- to 6-year-old children: The preferred hand is not the explanation. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition,
21, 34–49. doi:10.1080/1357650X.2015.1066383.
Google Scholar
Fischer, J. P., & Koch, A. M. (2016b). Mirror writing in typically developing children: A first longitudinal study. Cognitive Development,
38, 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.02.005.
Article
Google Scholar
Fischer, J. P., & Tazouti, Y. (2012). Unraveling the mystery of mirror writing in typically developing children. Journal of Educational Psychology,
104, 193–205. doi:10.1037/a0025735.
Article
Google Scholar
Flieller, A. (1994). Méthodes d’étude de l’adéquation au modèle logistique à un paramètre (modèle de Rasch) [Methods of assessment of Rasch’s model-data fit: A review]. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines,
127, 19–47.
Google Scholar
Gordon, H. (1921). Left-handedness and mirror writing, especially among defective children. Brain,
43, 313–368. doi:10.1093/brain/43.4.313.
Article
Google Scholar
Hildreth, G. (1950). The development and training of hand dominance: IV. Developmental problems associated with handedness. Journal of Genetic Psychology,
76, 39–100. doi:10.1080/08856559.1950.10533526.
Google Scholar
Ireland, W. W. (1881). On mirror-writing and its relation to left-handedness and cerebral disease. Brain,
4, 361–367. doi:10.1093/brain/4.3.361.
Article
Google Scholar
Kiefer, T., Robitzsch, A., & Wu, M. (2016). Package ‘TAM’: Test analysis modules (version 1.16-0). Retrieved from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TAM/TAM.pdf on February 6, 2016.
Lebrun, Y., Devreux, F., & Leleux, C. (1989). Mirror-writing. In P. G. Aaron & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (pp. 355–378). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Maass, A., Suitner, C., & Deconchy, J. P. (2014). Living in an asymmetrical world: How writing direction affects thought and action. London: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Maass, A., Suitner, C., & Nadhmi, F. (2014). What drives the spatial agency bias? An Italian–Malagasy–Arabic comparison study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
143, 991–996. doi:10.1037/a0034989.
Article
Google Scholar
Mair, P., & Hatzinger, R. (2007). Extended Rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. Journal of Statistical Software,
20(9), 1–20. doi:10.18637/jss.v020.i09.
Article
Google Scholar
Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2013). Goodness-of-fit assessment of item response theory models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives,
11(3), 71–101. doi:10.1080/15366367.2013.831680.
Google Scholar
McIntosh, R. D., & Della Sala, S. (2012). Mirror-writing. The Psychologist,
25, 742–746.
Google Scholar
Oosterhof, N. N., Wiggett, A. J., Diedrichsen, J., Tipper, S. P., & Downing, P. E. (2010). Surface-based information mapping reveals crossmodal vision-action representations in human parietal and occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology,
104, 1077–1089. doi:10.1152/jn.00326.2010.
Article
Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Ritchey, K. D. (2008). The building blocks of writing: Learning to write letters and spell words. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
21, 27–47. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9063-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Román, A., Flumini, A., Lizano, P., Escobar, M., & Santiago, J. (2015). Reading direction causes spatial biases in mental model construction in language understanding. Scientific Reports,
5(18248), 1–8. doi:10.1038/srep18248.
Google Scholar
Scheidemann, N. V. (1936). Inverse writing: A case of consistent mirror writing. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology,
48, 489–494. doi:10.1080/08856559.1936.10533745.
Article
Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, S. (2010). The mind of the child: Child development in literature, science, and medicine, 1840–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Spencer, M., Kaschak, M. P., Jones, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2015). Statistical learning is related to early literacy-related skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
28, 467–490. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9533-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Suitner, C. (2009). Where to place social targets? Stereotyping and spatial agency bias. Retrieved from http://paduaresearch.cab.unipd.it/1756/1/tesi_suitner.pdf on April 8, 2016.
Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2016). Spatial agency bias: Representing people in space. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,
53, 245–301. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.004.
Article
Google Scholar
Thompson, B., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2016). Culture shapes the evolution of cognition. PNAS,
113, 4530–4535. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523631113.
Article
Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Allaith, Z. (2013). Do reading habits influence aesthetic preferences? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,
26, 1381–1386. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9424-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Gordon, J., Boada, R., Peterson, R. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2014). Statistical learning, letter reversals, and reading. Scientific Studies of Reading,
18, 383–394. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.873937.
Article
Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2011). Similarities among the shapes of writing and their effects on learning. Written Language and Literacy,
14, 39–57. doi:10.1075/wll.14.1.03tre.
Article
Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & De Boeck, P. (2004). Descriptive and explanatory item response models. In P. de Boeck & M. Wilson (Eds.), Explanatory item response models: A generalized linear and nonlinear approach (pp. 43–74). New York, NY: Springer.
Chapter
Google Scholar