Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring productive elements of multi-word phrase vocabulary knowledge among children with English as an additional or only language

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vocabulary plays a critical role in language and reading development for children, particularly those learning English as an additional language (EAL) (Stahl & Nagy, 2006). Previous research on vocabulary has mainly focused on measuring individual words without considering multi-word phrase knowledge, despite evidence that these items occur frequently in English (Erman & Warren, 2000). Multi-word vocabulary knowledge and its contribution to literacy among children remains underexplored, possibly due to challenges presented in measuring this element of vocabulary and assessing children and learners with EAL. The current study adapted a test format designed for L2 adults (Revier, 2009) to develop a task measuring productive elements of English verb + object phrase knowledge. The measure was administered to 108 children (monolingual and EAL) between ages 7 and 10, along with a battery of standardized assessments. The measure possessed high internal consistency and temporal reliability, and correlated significantly with related vocabulary measures. Results showed significant differences among year groups and language backgrounds. Specifically, patterns in multi-word phrase knowledge across year group differ between children with EAL and monolingual English speakers. Findings are of import for understanding vocabulary acquisition and reading outcomes among both first and second language learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C., Cooke, R., Crutchley, A., Hesketh, A., & Reeves, D. (2001). Assessment of comprehension and expression 6–11 (ACE 6–11). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations? System, 21, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barfield, A., & Gyllstad, H. (2009). Researching collocations in another language. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (2010). Global–local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology, 46, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade instruction. In A. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223–242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, H. (2004). Noticing formulaic sequences: A problem of measuring the subjective. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biskup, D. (1992). L1 influence on learners’ renderings of English collocations: A Polish/German empirical study. In P. J. L. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 85–93). London, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, W. J. (2001). Testing EAL learners’ knowledge of collocations. In T. Hudson & J. D. Brown (Eds.), A focus on language test development: Expanding the language proficiency construct across a variety of tests (technical report #21) (pp. 113–142). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., & Towse, A. (2008). To get hold of the wrong end of the stick: Reasons for poor idiom understanding in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 51, 1538–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., Towse, A., & Knight, R. (2009). The development of idiom comprehension: An investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, K., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16, 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29, 72–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T. C. (1999). Processing of idioms by L2 learners of English. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 233–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Pintilie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, N., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 375–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text & Talk, 20, 29–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farghal, M., & Obiedat, H. (1995). Collocations: A neglected variable in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 313–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. (1987). Linguistic factors in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal of Child Language, 14, 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. (1991). Semantic analyzability in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 613–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R., Bogdanovich, J., Sykes, J., & Barr, D. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllstad, H. (2005). Words that go together well: Developing test formats for measuring learner knowledge of English collocations. In F. Heinat & E. Klingvall (Eds.), The department of English in Lund: Working papers in linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 1–31). Lund, Sweden: University of Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, H. M., & Nation, P. (2000). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified Texts? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., Whiteley, H., Smith, C., & Connors, L. (2003). The developmental progression of comprehension-related skills in children learning. EAL Journal of Research in Reading, 26(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaen, M. (2007). A corpus-driven design of a test for assessing the EAL collocational competence of university students. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarz, M. H., & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test performance: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (1991). The development of L2 lexis in the expression of the advanced learner. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 440–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N. K., Rupp, C. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2007). Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 821–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levorato, M. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children: Are the effects of semantic analyzability and context separable? The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levorato, M., & Cacciari, C. (1992). Children’s comprehension and production of idioms: The role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language, 19, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levorato, M., & Cacciari, C. (1995). The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liontas, J. (2002). Context and idiom understanding in second languages. EUROSLA Yearbook, 2, 155–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, R., & Murphy, V. (2011). The effect of frequency and idiomaticity on second language reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 267–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). A phrasal expressions list. Applied linguistics, 33, 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki, M. (2002). Exploration of two aspects of vocabulary knowledge: Paradigmatic and collocational. Annual Review of English Language, Education in Japan, 13, 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 63, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam, Holland: Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A. (1998). Later language development: The school-aged and adolescent years. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., & Martin, S. T. (1989). Idiom interpretation in isolation versus context: A developmental study with adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., Moran, C., & Schwatz, I. E. (2001). Idiom understanding in preadolescents: Synergy in action. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 10, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., & Rudzinski, M. (1993). Familiarity and transparency in idiom explanation: A developmental study of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (1995). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: A comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 45, 384–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). London, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. P., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, S. (2005). Collocations as a language resource. A functional and cognitive study in English phraseology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Denmark. Retrieved February 05, 2013, from http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/Files/Om_SDU/Fakulteterne/Humaniora/Phd/afhandlinger/2005/Afhandlinger%2048_s_poulsen%20pdf.pdf.

  • Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Revier, R. L. (2009). Evaluating a new test of whole English collocations. In A. Barfield & H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language (pp. 125–138). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi, W. (2000). Pragmatic comprehension in secondary school-aged students with specific developmental language disorder. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, F. P., Speece, D. L., & Cooper, D. H. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the connection between oral language and early reading. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1, pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 776–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Martinez, R. (2014). The idiom principle revisited. Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1093/applin/amt054.

  • Stahl, S., & Nagy, W. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies in Reading, 10, 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in a second language. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 90–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler individual achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (1992). Test of word knowledge. USA: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all our participating schools, including teachers, staff, the young learners and their families. We would also like to thank Mairéad McKendry and Sibylla Leon Guerrero for their feedback and support. This study was supported by The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, Educational Testing Service and Funds for Women Graduates.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara A. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, S.A., Murphy, V.A. Measuring productive elements of multi-word phrase vocabulary knowledge among children with English as an additional or only language. Read Writ 28, 347–369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9527-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9527-y

Keywords

Navigation