Undergraduates’ text messaging language and literacy skills
- 2.6k Downloads
Research investigating whether people’s literacy skill is being affected by the use of text messaging language has produced largely positive results for children, but mixed results for adults. We asked 150 undergraduate university students in Western Canada and 86 in South Eastern Australia to supply naturalistic text messages and to complete nonword reading and spelling tasks. The Australian students also completed two further real word and nonword reading tasks, a spoonerisms task, a questionnaire regarding their reading history, and a nonverbal reasoning task. We found few significant correlations between literacy scores and both use of textisms (such as u for you) and measures of texting experience. Specifically, textism use was negatively correlated with spelling for the Canadian students, and with scores for timed nonword reading, spoonerisms, and Adult Reading History for the Australian students. Length of phone ownership was negatively correlated with spelling (Canadians), but positively correlated with Word Attack scores (Australians), whereas daily message sending volumes were negatively correlated with Word Attack scores (Australians). Australian students who thought that using textisms was more appropriate had poorer nonword reading and reported having had more difficulty learning to read, than those who found it less appropriate. We conclude that there is inconsistent evidence for negative relationships between adults’ use of textisms and their literacy skills, and that these associations may be influenced by attitudes towards the appropriateness of textism use. A model of the potential relationship between adults’ textism use and literacy skills is presented.
KeywordsText-messaging Adults Literacy
- Baron, N. S., & Campbell, E. M. (2010, October). Talking takes too long: Gender and cultural patterns in mobile telephony. Paper presented at the conference of Association of Internet Researchers, Göteborg, Sweden. Retrieved from https://www.american.edu/cas/lfs/faculty-docs/upload/Talking-Takes-Too-Long.pdf.
- Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Drouin, M., & Driver, B. (2012). Texting, textese and literacy abilities: A naturalistic study. Journal of Research in Reading. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01532.x.
- Green, N. (2003). Outwardly mobile: Young people and mobile technologies. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 201–218). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Hatcher, J., & Snowling, M. (n.d.). York adult assessment. The University of York Centre for Reading and Language, York. Retrieved from www.york.ac.uk/media/psychology/crl/documents/YAA.pdf.
- Humphrys, J. (2007, September). I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language. Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-483511/I-h8-txtmsgs-How-texting-wrecking-language.html.
- International Telecommunication Union. (2010). The World in 2010. Retrieved from www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/.
- Lewandowski, G., & Harrington, S. (2006). The influence of phonetic abbreviations on evaluation of student performance. Current Research in Social Psychology, 11, 215–226.Google Scholar
- Martin, F., & Pratt, C. (2001). Nonword reading test. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Massengill Shaw, D., Carlson, C., & Waxman, M. (2007). An exploratory investigation into the relationship between text messaging and spelling. New England Reading Association Journal, 43, 57–62.Google Scholar
- Neville, L. (2003). Cn U rEd dis? The causes and consequences of a ‘text message language’ in young teenagers (unpublished undergraduate dissertation). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
- Parrila, R., Corkett, J., Kirby, J. R., & Hein, S. (2003). Adult reading history questionnaire—revised (unpublished questionnaire). Canada: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
- Shortis, T. (2007). Gr8 txtpectations: The creativity of text spelling. English Drama Media Journal, 8, 21–26.Google Scholar
- Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? Lol! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 8, 33–34.Google Scholar
- Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online. Retrieved from http://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html.
- Tseliga, T. (2007). “It’s all Greeklish to me!” Linguistic and sociocultural perspectives on Roman-alphabeted Greek in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. In B. Danet & S. C. Herring (Eds.), The multilingual internet: Language, culture, and communication online (pp. 116–141). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-fourth edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.) (WRAT-4). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Woodcock, R. (1999). Woodcock reading mastery tests—revised/normative update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.Google Scholar
- Woronoff, P. (2007, December). Cell phone texting can endanger spelling. Retrieved from http://www.articlesbase.com/cell-phones-articles/cell-phone-texting-can-endanger-spelling-276413.html.