Skip to main content

Beginning to disentangle the prosody-literacy relationship: a multi-component measure of prosodic sensitivity

Abstract

A growing number of studies now suggest that sensitivity to the rhythmic patterning of speech (prosody) is implicated in successful reading acquisition. However, recent evidence suggests that prosody is not a unitary construct and that the different components of prosody (stress, intonation, and timing) operating at different linguistic levels (word, phrase, and sentence) may be related to reading development in different ways. Sixty-two five- to seven-year-old English-speaking children completed a newly developed, multi-component measure designed to assess several different aspects of prosodic sensitivity in a single, easily-administered task. The new measure was found to be sensitive to individual differences in prosodic sensitivity and participants’ overall scores were significantly correlated with measures of vocabulary, phonological awareness, phonological decoding, text reading accuracy, and reading comprehension. An exploratory factor analysis suggested that the multi-component measure of prosodic sensitivity distinguished between the processing of stress, intonation, and timing. The task also distinguished between word-level and sentence-level sensitivity to stress information. These findings add to the growing literature demonstrating a relationship between prosodic sensitivity and reading and represent a first step towards disentangling prosody and developing a more sophisticated understanding of its role in early reading development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Boersma, P. (2001). PRAAT: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, H., Chung, K. K. H., Wong, S. W. L., McBride-Chang, C., Penney, T. B., & Ho, C.-S. H. (2008). Perception of tone and aspiration contrasts in Chinese children with dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 726–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clin, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Heggie, L. (2009). Prosodic sensitivity and morphological awareness in children’s reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(2), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corriveau, K., Pasquini, E., & Goswami, U. (2007). Basic auditory processing skills and specific language impairment: A new look at an old hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 647–666. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, N., Frith, U., & Reason, R. (1997). Phonological assessment battery. Windsor: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetry, V., Wade-Woolley, L., Kolinsky, R., & Mousty, P. (2006). The role of stress processing abilities in the development of bilingual reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 349–362. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00313.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., Gerson, D., & Astruc, L. (2009). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 995–1019. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9186-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., Thomson, J., Richardson, U., Stainthorp, R., Hughes, D., Rosen, S., et al. (2002). Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: A new hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(16), 10911–10916. doi:10.1073/pnas.122368599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez-Palma, N., & Reyes, A. P. (2007). Stress sensitivity and reading performance in Spanish: A study with children. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadding, K., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1974). Are you asking me, telling me, or talking to yourself? Journal of Phonetics, 2, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2008). Sensitivity to speech rhythm explains individual differences in reading ability independently of phonological awareness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 357–367. doi:10.1348/026151007X241623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010a). Does speech rhythm sensitivity predict children’s reading ability 1 year later? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 356–366. doi:10.1037/a0018049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010b). The contribution of sensitivity to speech rhythm and non-speech rhythm to early reading development. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 247–267. doi:10.1080/01443410903560922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2012). A cross-sectional study of prosodic sensitivity and reading difficulties. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(1), 32–48. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01459.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzen, K. (2001). Prosodic sensitivity, morphological ability, and reading ability in young adults with and without childhood histories of reading difficulty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colombia–New York.

  • Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. (2004). Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, V., Hämäläinen, J., Soltész, F., & Goswami, U. (2011). Rise time perception and detection of syllable stress in adults with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2011), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., Lam, F., Lam, C., Doo, S., Wong, S. W. L., & Chow, Y. Y. Y. (2008a). Word recognition and cognitive profiles of Chinese pre-school children at risk for dyslexia through language delay or familial history of dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., Tong, X., Shu, H., Wong, A. M.-Y., Leung, K., & Tardif, T. (2008b). Syllable, phonemes, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 171–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (2006). Prosody of syntactically complex sentences in the oral reading of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 839–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muneaux, M., Ziegler, J. C., Truc, C., Thomson, J., & Goswami, U. (2004). Deficits in beat perception and dyslexia: Evidence from French. NeuroReport, 15, 1255–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., & Diethelm, K. (2001). The contribution of phonological skills and letter knowledge to early reading development in a multilingual population. Language Learning, 51, 187–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3–27. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. (1997). The Neale Analysis of Reading Ability II. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.

  • Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., & Goswami, U. (2007). Auditory processing of amplitude envelope rise-time in adults diagnosed with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 259–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C., & Rust, J. (2008). Coloured progressive matrices and crichton vocabulary scale. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Mashraki, Y. E. (2007). Prosodic reading, reading comprehension and morphological skills in Hebrew-speaking fourth graders. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 140–156. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00340.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, U., Thomson, J. M., Scott, S. K., & Goswami, U. (2004). Auditory processing skills and phonological representation in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 10, 215–233. doi:10.1002/dys.276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 119–129. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang, C. (2008). Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Developmental Science, 11, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. M., Fryer, B., Maltby, J., & Goswami, U. (2006). Auditory and motor rhythm awareness in adults with dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 334–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, K., & Hansen, J. (2006). The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 288–303. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00309.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. (2002). Parent-child pre-school activities can affect the development of literacy skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. (2006). Metrical stress sensitivity in young children and its relationship to phonological awareness and reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 270–287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00308.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C., & Terrell, C. (1998). Poor readers’ ability to detect speech rhythm and perceive rapid speech. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(3), 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain Size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant to ‘First Author’ from the British Academy. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the schools, teachers, parents, and children who participated in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Holliman.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Stimuli and scoring sheet for the Dina the Diver task

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holliman, A.J., Williams, G.J., Mundy, I.R. et al. Beginning to disentangle the prosody-literacy relationship: a multi-component measure of prosodic sensitivity. Read Writ 27, 255–266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9443-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9443-6

Keywords