Several researchers emphasize the role of the writer’s topic knowledge for writing. In academic writing topic knowledge is often constructed by studying source texts. One possibility to support that essential phase of the writing process is to provide interactive learning questions which facilitate the construction of an adequate situation model by initiating macro-strategies. In order to examine whether the provision of interactive learning questions during studying source texts leads to better results in academic writing both writing process and performance of a group supported by interactive learning questions was compared to a study-only group which read the source texts without learning questions. Results revealed that students provided with interactive learning questions wrote longer essays and spend significantly more time prewriting and writing/revising their essays than did the students of the study-only group. Studying source texts with learning questions resulted in text products of better readability and partly better accuracy and coverage of content. These findings suggest that engaging students in answering learning questions when reading source texts can positively affect both writing process and performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ackerman, J. M. (1991). Reading, writing, and knowing: The role of disciplinary knowledge in comprehension and composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 133–178.
Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). Hilgard’s Introduction to Psychology (13th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Bamberger, R., & Rabin, A. T. (1984). New approaches to readability: Austrian research. Reading Teacher, 37, 512–519.
Benton, S. L., Corkill, A. J., Sharp, J. M., Downey, R. G., & Khramtsova, I. (1995). Knowledge, interest, and narrative writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 66–79. doi:10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.11.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Britt, M., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing tasks. Reading Psychology, 25, 313–339. doi:10.1080/02702710490522658.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80002-4.
Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35, 25–37. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4.
Butcher, K. R., & Kintsch, W. (2001). Support of content and rhetorical processes of writing: Effects on the writing process and the written product. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 277–322. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1903_2.
Butterfield, E. C., Hacker, D. J., & Albertson, L. R. (1996). Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 239–297. doi:10.1007/BF01464075.
Cerdán, R., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Gilabert, R., & Gil, L. (2009). Impact of question-answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 19, 13–27. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.12.003.
Dansac, C., & Alamargot, D. (1999). Accessing referential information during text composition: When and why? In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 79–97). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Durst, R. K. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 347–376.
Eigler, G., Jechle, T., Merziger, G., & Winter, A. (1990). Knowledge and text production. In H. Mandl, E. De Corte, S. N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and Instruction: European Research in an International Context. Analysis of Complex Skills and Complex Knowledge Domains (pp. 341–356). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Groeben, N. (1982). Leserpsychologie: Textverständnis—Textverständlichkeit [Reader psychology: Text comprehension - text comprehensibility]. Münster, Germany: Aschendorff.
Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212–242. doi:10.2307/1170376.
Hammann, L. A., & Stevens, R. J. (2003). Instructional approaches to improving students’ writing of compare-contrast essays: An experimental study. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 731–756. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3502_3.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41, 1106–1113. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1106.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56, 473–493. doi:10.2307/1170342.
Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 144–157). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Jucks, R. (2001). Was verstehen Laien? Die Verständlichkeit von Fachtexten aus der Sicht von Computer-Experten [What do laypersons understand? The comprehensibility of scientific texts out of experts’ perspective]. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Kapp, F., Narciss, S., Körndle, H., & Proske, A. (2011). Interaktive Lernaufgaben als Erfolgsfaktor für E-Learning [Interactive learning questions as a success factor for e-learning]. Zeitschrift für E-Learning, 6(1), 21–32.
Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Effects of topic knowledge on the allocation of processing time and cognitive effort to writing processes. Memory & Cognition, 15, 256–266. doi:10.3758/BF03197724.
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Long-term working memory in text production. Memory & Cognition, 29, 43–52. doi:10.3758/BF03195739.
Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension theory as a guide for the design of thoughtful questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 51–64. doi:10.1097/00011363-200501000-00006.
Kucer, S. L. (1985). The making of meaning: Reading and writing as parallel processes. Written Communication, 2, 317–336. doi:10.1177/0741088385002003006.
Langer, I., Schulz von Thun, F., & Tausch, R. (1993). Sich verständlich ausdrücken [Comprehensible verbal expression]. München, Germany: Reinhardt.
Loftus, E. F. (1979). The malleability of human memory. American Scientist, 67, 312–320.
McCarthy Young, K., & Leinhardt, G. (1998). Writing from primary documents. Written Communication, 15, 25–68. doi:10.1177/0741088398015001002.
McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 431–444. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7.
McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13–23. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3.
McCutchen, D., Francis, M., & Kerr, S. (1997). Revising for meaning: Effects of knowledge and strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 667–676. doi:10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1687.
McDaniel, M. A., & Wooldridge, C. (2012). The science of learning and its applications. In W. Buskist & V. A. Benassi (Eds.), Effective College and University Teaching: Strategies and Tactics for the New Professoriate (pp. 49–60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. doi:10.1007/BF02505024.
Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (3rd ed., pp. 125–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nussbaum, E. M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students’ writing. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 59–92. doi:10.3200/JEXE.76.1.59-92.
Parodi, G. (2007). Reading-writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 225–250. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7.
Proske, A. (2007). Wissenschaftliches Schreiben. Konzeption und Realisierung computerbasierter Trainingsaufgaben [Academic Writing. Conception and realisation of computer-based training tasks]. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
Proske, A., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2012). Interactive learning tasks. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (Vol. 1, pp. 1606–1611). Heidelberg: Springer.
Rae, G. (1988). The equivalence of multiple rater kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 367–374. doi:10.1177/0013164488482009.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7, 256–287. doi:10.1177/0741088390007002004.
Spivey, N. N., & King, J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7–26. doi:10.1598/RRQ.24.1.1.
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Dijkstra, S. (1997). The Four-Component Instructional Design Model for training complex cognitive skills. In R. D. Tennyson, N. Seel, S. Dijkstra, & F. Schott (Eds.), Instructional Design: International Perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 427–445). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311. doi:10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.1241.
We would like to thank Anna Kamphausen and Katharina Abel for their excellent work in preparing and conducting the study, as well as in rating the written products. Furthermore, we are grateful to Annemarie Hilbig and Gregor Damnik for their assistance during data collection.
About this article
Cite this article
Proske, A., Kapp, F. Fostering topic knowledge: essential for academic writing. Read Writ 26, 1337–1352 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9421-4
- Writing from sources
- Academic writing
- Learning questions
- Writing process
- Topic knowledge
- Text comprehension