Reading and Writing

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 739–769 | Cite as

Links between early rhythm skills, musical training, and phonological awareness

  • Catherine Moritz
  • Sasha Yampolsky
  • Georgios Papadelis
  • Jennifer Thomson
  • Maryanne Wolf
Article

Abstract

A small number of studies show that music training is associated with improvements in reading or in its component skills. A central question underlying this present research is whether musical activity can enhance the acquisition of reading skill, potentially before formal reading instruction begins. We explored two dimensions of this question: an investigation of links between kindergartners’ music rhythm skills and their phonological awareness in kindergarten and second grade; and an investigation of whether kindergartners who receive intensive musical training demonstrate more phonological skills than kindergartners who receive less. Results indicated that rhythm skill was related to phonological segmentation skill at the beginning of kindergarten, and that children who received more music training during kindergarten showed improvement in a wider range of phonological awareness skills at the end of kindergarten than children with less training. Further, kindergartners’ rhythm ability was strongly related to their phonological awareness and basic word identification skills in second grade. We argue that rhythm sensitivity is a pre-cursor skill to oral language acquisition, and that the ability to perceive and manipulate time intervals in sound streams may link performance of rhythm and phonological tasks.

Keywords

Music Reading Rhythm Phonological awareness Timing 

References

  1. Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anvari, S. H., Trainor, L. J., Woodside, J., & Levy, B. A. (2002). Relations among musical skills, phonological processing, and early reading ability in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baruch, C., & Drake, C. (1997). Tempo discrimination in infants. Infant Behaviorial Development, 20, 573–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beethoven, J., Brumfield, S., Campbell, P. S., Connors, D. N., Duke, R. A., & Jellison, J. A. (2005). Silver-Burdett making music: Kindergarten teacher edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature, 301, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, S. (1986). Short-term memory, phonological processing, and reading ability. Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant, P. E., Bradley, L., Maclean, M., & Crossland, J. (1989). Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading. Journal of Child Language, 16, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butzlaff, R. (2000). Can music be used to teach reading? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, H., & Trehub, S. E. (1977). Infants’ perception of temporal grouping in auditory patterns. Child Development, 48, 1666–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa-Giomi, E. (1997). The McGill piano projects: Effects of piano instruction on children’s cognitive abilities. In Proceedings of the third triennial European Society for the Cognitive Science of Music Conference, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  12. Costa-Giomi, E. (2004). Effects of three years of piano instruction on children’s academic achievement, school performance, and self-esteem. Psychology of Music, 32, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtin, S., Mintz, T. H., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Stress changes the representational landscape: Evidence from word segmentation. Cognition, 96, 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutler, A. (1991). Linguistic rhythm and speech segmentation. In L. Sundeberg, L. Nord, & R. Carlson (Eds.), Music, language, speech, and brain (Wenner-Gren symposium series 59) (pp. 157–166). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1994). Mora or phonemes? Further evidence for language-specific listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 824–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dana Foundation. (2008). Learning, arts, and the brain: The Dana Consortium report on arts and cognition. New York, NY: Author.Google Scholar
  18. David, D., Wade-Woolley, L., Kirby, J. R., & Smithrim, K. (2007). Rhythm and reading development in school-age children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Degé, F., & Schwarzer, G. (2011). The effect of a music program on phonological awareness in preschoolers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 124. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Demany, L., McKenzie, B., & Vurpillot, E. (1977). Rhythm perception in early infancy. Nature, 266, 718–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diamantes, T., Young, K. M., & McBee, K. (2002). An analysis of reading and content area skills improvement through music instruction. Reading Improvement, 39(3), 114–118.Google Scholar
  22. Douglas, S., & Willats, P. (1994). The relationship between musical ability and literacy skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 17, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  24. Elkind, D. (2010). The hurried child: Growing up too fast too soon. Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press/Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  25. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, D. (2001). Early language learning with and without music. Reading Horizons, 42(1), 40–49.Google Scholar
  27. Fisher, D., & McDonald, N. (2001). The intersection between music and early literacy instruction: Listening to literacy. Reading Improvement, 38, 106–115.Google Scholar
  28. Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Liberman, I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goswami, U. (2002). Phonology, reading development and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holliman, A. J., Wood, C., & Sheehy, K. (2010). The contribution of sensitivity to speech and non-speech rhythm to early reading development. Educational Psychology, 30, 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hurwitz, I., Wolff, P. H., Bortnick, B., & Kokas, K. (1975). Non-musical effects of the Kodály music curriculum in primary grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jordan, T., Grall, R., Deutsch, M., & Deutsch, C. (1985). Long term effects of early enrichment: A 20 year perspective on persistence and change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jusczyk, P. W., & Thompson, E. (1978). Perception of a phonetic contrast in multisyllabic utterances by 2-month-old infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Kaufman brief intelligence test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  36. Kodály, Z. (1974). The selected writings of Zoltán Kodály. London: Boosey & Hawkes.Google Scholar
  37. Kujala, T., Myllyviita, K., Tervaniemi, M., Alho, K., Kallio, J., & Naatanen, R. (2000). Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements. Psychophysiology, 37, 262–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1979). Speech, the alphabet and teaching to read. In L. Resnick & P. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 2, pp. 109–132). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Mehler, J., & Christophe, A. (1995). Maturation and learning of language in the first year of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P., Lambertz, G., & Halsted, N. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Montague, K. J. (2002). Music and reading: Evidence for shared cognitive processes and implications for theory, diagnosis and treatment of dyslexia. Unpublished masters’ thesis, Tufts University, Medford, MA.Google Scholar
  42. Moreno, S., Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Schellenberg, E. G., Cepeda, N. J., & Chau, T. (2011). Short-term music training enhances verbal intelligence and executive function. Psychological Science, 22, 1425–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moreno, S., Marques, C., Santos, A., Santos, M., Castro, S. L., & Besson, M. (2009). Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: More evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 712–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., Wolf, M., Sevcik, R. A., Steinbach, K. A., Frijters, J. C., & Shapiro, M. B. (2010). Multi-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication doi:10.1177/0022219409355472.
  45. National Reading Panel. (2000). National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institute of Health and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
  46. Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., & Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 756–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Overy, K. (2003). Dyslexia and music: From timing deficits to musical intervention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Overy, K., Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Clarke, E. F. (2003). Dyslexia and music: measuring musical timing skills. Dyslexia, 9, 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Patel, A. D. (2011). Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 142. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patel, A. D., & Daniele, J. R. (2003). An empirical comparison of rhythm in language and music. Cognition, 87, B35–B45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pouthas, V. (1996). The development of the perception of time and temporal regulation of action in infants and children. In I. Deliege & S. Sloboda (Eds.), Musical beginnings: Origins and development of musical competence (pp. 115–141). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robertson, C., & Salter, W. (1997). The phonological awareness test. East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.Google Scholar
  54. Stanovich, K. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. Torgesen & B. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87–131). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  55. Szönyi, E. (1973). Kodály’s principles in practice: An approach to music education through the Kodály method. London, UK: Boosey & Hawkes.Google Scholar
  56. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  58. Trehub, S. E., & Thorpe, L. A. (1989). Infants’ perception of rhythm: categorization of auditory sequences by temporary structure. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 43, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wagner, R., & Torgesen, J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  61. Witton, C., Talcott, J. B., Hansen, P. C., Richardson, A. J., Griffiths, T. D., Rees, A., et al. (1998). Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexics and normal readers. Current Biology, 8, 791–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  63. Wolf, M., Miller, L., & Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, automaticity, vocabulary, elaboration, orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive, fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wolff, P. (2002). Timing precision and rhythm in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wood, C., Wade-Woolley, L., & Holliman, A. J. (2009). Phonological awareness: Beyond phonemes. In C. Wood & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised (WRMT-R). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Moritz
    • 1
  • Sasha Yampolsky
    • 1
  • Georgios Papadelis
    • 2
  • Jennifer Thomson
    • 3
  • Maryanne Wolf
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Reading and Language ResearchTufts UniversityMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Department of Music StudiesAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Faculty of Harvard Graduate School of EducationCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations