Inference generation, story comprehension, and language skills in the preschool years
- 1.9k Downloads
Several researchers have shown that children’s ability to make inferences is related to their reading comprehension. The majority of research on this topic has been conducted on older children. However, given the recent focus on the importance of narrative comprehension in prereaders, the current study examined the relationship between inference making and story comprehension in 4- to 5-year-olds. We examined children’s online inferences while narrating a wordless book as well as children’s story comprehension of a different storybook. We found that children’s total number of inferences was significantly related to their story comprehension. Three types of inferences were significantly related to story comprehension—characters goals, actions that achieved those goals, and character states. In a hierarchical regression controlling for children’s age and expressive vocabulary, a composite of these three inference types significantly predicted children’s story comprehension.
KeywordsInference Comprehension Language Literacy Narrative
We would like to thank the families and child care centers who participated in this study. We would also like to thank Sarah Helton for her assistance in the development of the coding scheme and coding of the narratives.
- Adams, M. (2010). Advancing our students’ language and literacy: The challenge of complex texts. American Educator, 34(4), 3–11.Google Scholar
- Beals, D. E., & De Temple, J. M. (1993). Home contributions to early language and literacy development. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 42, 207–215.Google Scholar
- Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT-4) (4th ed.). Circle Pines, MN, USA: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, E. D. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge—of words and the world. American Educator, 27(1), 10–13, 16–22, 28–29, 48.Google Scholar
- Kendeou, P., Lynch, J. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., & Kremer, K. E. (2005). Developing successful readers: Building early comprehension skills through television viewing and listening. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 91–98. doi: 10.1007/s10643-005-0030-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayer, M. (1992). Frog goes to dinner. New York, NY, USA: Dial Press.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). The nation’s report card: Reading 2009. Retrieved June 24, 2011 from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2010458.pdf.
- National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy. Jessup, MD, USA: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
- Perfetti, C. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, E. (2008). Sergio makes a splash. New York, NY, USA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K. (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 318–337. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00167-9.
- Stein, N. L. (1988). The development of children’s storytelling skill. In M. B. Franklin & S. S. Barten (Eds.), Child language: A reader (pp. 282–297). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2000). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Trabasso, T., & Rodkin, P. C. (1994). Knowledge of goal/plans: A conceptual basis for narrating frog, where are you? In R. A. Berman & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A cross-linguistic developmental study (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Trabasso, T., & Stein, N. L. (1994). Using goal-plan knowledge to merge the past with the present and the future in narrating events on line. In M. M. Haith, J. B. Benson, R. J. Roberts, & B. F. Pennington (Eds.), The development of future-oriented processes (pp. 323–349). Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Trabasso, T., & Stein, N. L. (1997). Narrating, representing, and remembering event sequences. In P. W. van den Broek, P. J. Bauer, & T. Bourg (Eds.), Developmental spans in event comprehension and representation: Bridging fictional and actual events. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J., Butler, J., White, M. J., et al. (2005a). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 107–130). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.Google Scholar
- Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from pre-readers to readers. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 11–29). New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, K. (2006). Expressive vocabulary test (EVT-2) (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN, USA: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Yore, L. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.Google Scholar