Reading and Writing

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 917–934

The role of invented spelling on learning to read in low-phoneme awareness kindergartners: a randomized-control-trial study

  • Monique Sénéchal
  • Gene Ouellette
  • Stephanie Pagan
  • Rosemary Lever
Article

Abstract

The goal of the present intervention research was to test whether guided invented spelling would facilitate entry into reading for at-risk kindergarten children. The 56 participating children had poor phoneme awareness, and as such, were at risk of having difficulty acquiring reading skills. Children were randomly assigned to one of three training conditions: invented spelling, phoneme segmentation, or storybook reading. All children participated in 16 small group sessions over 8 weeks. In addition, children in the three training conditions received letter-knowledge training and worked on the same 40 stimulus words that were created from an array of 14 letters. The findings were clear: on pretest, there were no differences between the three conditions on measures of early literacy and vocabulary, but, after training, invented spelling children learned to read more words than did the other children. As expected, the phoneme-segmentation and invented-spelling children were better on phoneme awareness than were the storybook-reading children. Most interesting, however, both the invented spelling and the phoneme-segmentation children performed similarly on phoneme awareness suggesting that the differential effect on learning to read was not due to phoneme awareness per se. As such, the findings support the view that invented spelling is an exploratory process that involves the integration of phoneme and orthographic representations. With guidance and developmentally appropriate feedback, invented spelling provides a milieu for children to explore the relation between oral language and written symbols that can facilitate their entry in reading.

Keywords

Intervention Invented spelling Kindergarten Reading 

References

  1. Ball, E. W., & Bachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caravolas, M., Volín, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, L. K. (1988). Invented versus traditional spelling in first graders’ writings: Effects on learning to spell and read. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 281–309.Google Scholar
  6. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). The peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  7. Ehri, L. (1989). Development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehri, L. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phoneme awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1987). Does learning to spell help beginners learn to read words? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elkonin, D. B. (1973). U.S.S.R. In I. Downing (Ed.), Comparative reading: Cross national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing (pp. 551–580). New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Exter, NH: Heineman education Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K. Patterson, M. Coltheart, & J. Marshall (Eds.), Surface dyslexia, neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 301–330). London, GB: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Gentry, J. R., & Gillet, J. W. (1993). Teaching kids to spell. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Henderson, E. H. (1981). Learning to read and spell: A child’s knowledge of words. DeKalb, IL: N. Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hohn, W., & Ehri, L. (1983). Do alphabet letters help prereaders acquire phoneme segmentation skill? Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 752–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lever, R., & Sénéchal, M. (2011). Discussing stories: How a dialogic reading intervention improves kindergarteners’ oral narrative construction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lonigan, C. J., Burgess, S. R., & Anthony, J. L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent-variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36, 596–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martins, M. A., & Silva, C. (2006). The impact of invented spelling on phoneme awareness. Learning-and-Instruction, 16, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McBride-Chang, C. (1998). The development of invented spelling. Early Education and Development, 9, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morris, D., & Perney, J. (1984). Developmental spelling as a predictor of first grade reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 440–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2008a). Pathways to literacy: A study of invented spelling and its role in learning to read. Child Development, 79, 899–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2008b). A window into early literacy: Exploring the cognitive and linguistic underpinnings of invented spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  26. Read, C. (1971). Pre-school children’s knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 1–34.Google Scholar
  27. Richgels, D. J. (1995). Invented spelling ability and printed word learning in kindergarten. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rieben, L., Ntamakiliro, L., Gonthier, B., & Fayol, M. (2005). Effects of various early writing practices on reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Pasquale, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152, 1–8.Google Scholar
  31. Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Journal for the Scientific Study of Reading, 10, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological coding and self-teaching: Sine-qua-non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shatil, E., Share, D. L., & Levin, I. (2000). On the contribution of kindergarten writing to grade 1 literacy: A longitudinal study in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silva, C., & Martins, M. A. (2003). Relations between children’s invented spelling and the development of phonological awareness. Educational Psychology, 23, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sirois, P., Boisclair, A., & Giasson, J. (2008). Understanding of the alphabetic principle through invented spelling among hearing-impaired children learning to read and write: Experimentation with a pedagogical approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tangel, D. M., & Blachman, B. A. (1992). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on kindergarten children’s invented spelling. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 233–261.Google Scholar
  37. Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  40. Weschler, D. (1989). Weschler preschool and primary scale of intelligence—revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  41. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests—revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monique Sénéchal
    • 1
  • Gene Ouellette
    • 2
  • Stephanie Pagan
    • 1
  • Rosemary Lever
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Mount Allison UniversitySackvilleCanada

Personalised recommendations