Skip to main content
Log in

Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This cross-sectional study investigated contributions of phonological awareness (Elision and blending), rapid naming (object, color, letter, and digit), and phonological memory (nonword repetition and Digit Span) to basic decoding and fluency skills in Arabic. Participants were 237 Arabic speaking children from Grades K-3. Dependent measures included word decoding, oral passage reading fluency, nonword reading fluency, and retell fluency. Within-grade analyses indicated that phonological awareness accounted for more variance than rapid naming regardless of the nature of the outcome measure and grade. Rapid naming’s capacity to predict variance, while less than that of phonological awareness, tended to rise steadily and was highest in Grade 3. Phonological memory, as measured by this study’s tasks, showed almost no relationship to reading performance. The findings are discussed with respect to changing the requirements of Arabic reading in Grades K-3 and suggestions are made for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Phonological processing will be used to refer to the uses of internal forms of speech information for representing, storing and/or retrieving spoken and written language.

  2. Phonological awareness will refer to a set of linguistic and metalinguistic skills involving the capacity to reflect on the sound structure of spoken words (Muter et al., 1997; Stahl & Murray, 1994). Rapid naming (RAN) will reference the capacity to retrieve phonological codes stored in long-term memory (measured by the amount of time required to name a group of stimuli such as numbers, letters, colors, or common objects; e.g., Allor, 2002; Wolf, 1986, 1991). Phonological memory (PM) refers to a processing resource of limited capacity involved in the preservation of information, which in the case of phonological working memory also involves manipulation of the same or other information (Baddeley & Logie, 1999; Swanson & Sáez, 2003).

  3. In Arabic, three long vowels are also denoted as letters and short vowels are noted with diacritics.

  4. A noteworthy exception is that Arabic Qu’ranic texts retain diacritics in order to standardize pronunciation.

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in grades 3, 6, 8, 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., Share, D., & Mansour, M. S. (2003). Word recognition and basic cognitive processes among reading-disabled and normal readers in Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (2002). Reading, syntactic, orthographic, and working memory skills of bilingual Arabic-English speaking Canadian children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic-Hebrew-English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 611–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allor, J. H. (2002). The relationships of phonemic awareness and rapid naming to reading development. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 25, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mannai, H. A., & Everatt, J. (2005). Phonological processing skills as predictors of literacy amongst Arabic speaking Bahraini school children. Dyslexia, 11, 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, J. L., & Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aro, M., & Wimmer, H. (2003). Learning to read: English in comparison to six more regular orthographies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, R. (1993). The nature of Arabic reading and spelling errors of young children. Reading and Writing, 5(4), 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–29). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., Deutsch, A., & Lieberman, I. Y. (1990). Syntactic competence and reading ability in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49(1), 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. A. (1991). The role of working memory in reading disability. In I. Liberman, S. Brady, & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 129–151). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Estimating the risk of future reading difficulties in kindergarten children: A research-based model and its clinical implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mimran, R. (2009). The contribution of language skills to reading fluency: A comparison of two orthographies for Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 36, 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P., & Bright, W. (Eds.). (1996). The world’s writing systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufva, M., Niemi, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeheri, G., Everatt, J., Reid, G., & Al-Mannai, H. (2006). Dyslexia assessment in Arabic. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everatt, J., & Elbeheri, G. (2008). Dyslexia in transparent orthographies: Variability in transparency. In G. Reid, A. Fawcett, F. Manis, & L. Siegel (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 427–438). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8(3), 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Baddeley, A. D., & Emslie, E. (1994). The children’s test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 22(2), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1993). The concurrent development of spelling and decoding in two different orthographies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(4), 383–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, G. T. (2004). Phonological awareness: From research to practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological representation, reading development and dyslexia: Toward a cross-linguistic theoretical framework. Dyslexia, 6, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulandris, N. (2003). Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons. London, UK: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. (1965). Introduction to Hebrew. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. (2002). Adapting achievement tests into multiple languages for international assessments. In C. Porter & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 59–76). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, C., Ayre, A., Haynes, B., & Mahfoudhi, A. (2009). Reading disabilities in Spanish- and Spanish-English contexts. In G. Reid, G. Elbeheri, & J. Everatt (Eds.), International handbook of dyslexia (pp. 63–85). New York, NY: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, J., Alvarez, C., Estevez, A., & Hernandez-Valle, I. (2000). Onset-rime units in visual word recognition in Spanish normal readers and children with reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, H., Aro, M., Eklund, K., Erskine, J., Guttorm, T., Laakso, M.-L., et al. (2004). The development of children at familial risk for dyslexia: Birth to early school age. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 184–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster. (2003). Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). USA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. W., & Evans, J. L. (2009). Complex sentence comprehension and working memory in children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 52(2), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mursi, K. I. (1999). Kuwaiti test for non-verbal intelligent. Kuwait, Kuwait: Ministry of Education, Department of Social Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (1997). Phonological abilities test (PAT). London, UK: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18, 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R., Lavers, N., & Pillay, V. (2007). Working memory and reading difficulties: What we know and what we don’t know about the relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 185–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disability—A view of the spectrum (pp. 75–119). Timonium, MD: York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy skills in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D., & Levin, I. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 89–133). West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smythe, I., Everatt, J., Al-Menaye, N., He, X., Capellini, S., Cyarmathy, E., et al. (2008). Predictors of word-level literacy amongst grade 3 children in five diverse languages. Dyslexia, 14, 17–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smythe, I., Everatt, J., & Salter, R. (Eds.). (2004). The international book of dyslexia. London, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: Individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Development, 74, 358–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. A., & Murray, B. A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrink, C., & Klatte, M. (2008). Phonological working memory in German children with poor reading and spelling abilities. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice., 14(4), 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suk-Han Ho, C., & Bryant, P. (1997). Development of phonological awareness of Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, L. H., & Sáez, L. (2003). Memory difficulties in children and adults with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 182–198). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., & Burgess, S. R. (1998). Consistency of reading related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 161–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing admits casual role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1986). Dyslexia, dysnomia and lexical retrieval: A longitudinal investigation. Brain and Language, 28, 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge King Abdulaziz University (KAU) for funding this research project via its Short Term Research Funding Program; participant children, teachers and parents in the Jeddah area schools for their willing involvement; and the graduate students in KAU’s Childhood Studies Program of 2008 who helped with data gathering and data entry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia J. Taibah.

Appendix

Appendix

Sample of the Elision subtest

Sample of the blending words subtest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taibah, N.J., Haynes, C.W. Contributions of phonological processing skills to reading skills in Arabic speaking children. Read Writ 24, 1019–1042 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9273-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9273-8

Keywords

Navigation