Skip to main content
Log in

Noun or verb? Adult readers’ sensitivity to spelling cues to grammatical category in word endings

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spelling of many disyllabic English word endings holds cues to their grammatical category, beyond obvious inflectional endings such as -ing for verbs. For example, some letter sequences are clearly associated with nouns (e.g., -oon) and others with verbs (e.g., -erge). This study extended recent research by Arciuli and Cupples (2006), and confirmed that skilled adult readers are sensitive to these orthographic cues. It was found that adults were more likely to treat pseudowords as nouns when they had noun-like endings than verb-like or control endings, and more likely to treat pseudowords as verbs when they had verb-like than noun-like endings. This sensitivity held across three tasks (sentence construction, sentence judgement, and pseudoword judgement), which required increasingly explicit awareness of the way that cues could allow grammatical categorisation. In some tasks sensitivity to verb-like endings was related to reading ability, although not to spelling ability or grammatical awareness. Implications for our understanding of language processing are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2003). Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification. Language and Speech, 46, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2004). The effects of stress typicality during spoken word recognition by native and non-native speakers: Evidence from onset-gating. Memory and Cognition, 32, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2006). The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 920–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2007). Would you rather ‘embert a cudsert’ or ‘cudsert an embert’? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. In A. Schalley & D. Khlentzos (Eds.), Mental states: Language and cognitive structure (pp. 213–237).

  • Arciuli, J., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Hidden cues to grammatical category in the spelling of English disyllables The 15th Australian Language and Speech Conference. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arciuli, J., & Slowiaczek, L. (2007). The where and when of linguistic word level prosody. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2638–2642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arévalo, A., Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Butler, A., Bates, E., & Dronkers, N. (2007). Action and object processing in aphasia: From nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability. Brain and Language, 100, 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. G., & Smith, P. T. (1976). A psycholinguistic study of English stress assignment rules. Language and Speech, 19, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M., & Chiat, S. (2003). Noun-verb dissociations: A multi-faceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, J. E. (1997). Resolving syntactic category ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 588–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 631–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, K. W., & Kelly, M. (1991). Phonological information for grammatical category assignments. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 348–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, K. W., & Kelly, M. (2001). Children’s use of phonology to infer grammatical class in vocabulary learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Journal, 8, 519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (1976). Play with language and metalinguistic awareness: One dimension of language experience. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 603–608). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico, S., Bentrovato, S., Gasparini, M., Costabile, D., & Bates, E. (2002). Timed picture-naming in Italian-speaking children and adults: Differences between nouns and verbs. Paper Presented at IASCL-SRCLD, Madison, WI.

  • Davis, S. M., & Kelly, M. (1997). Knowledge of the English noun-verb stress difference by native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durieux, G., & Gillis, S. (2001). Predicting grammatical classes from phonological cues: An empirical test. In J. Weissenborn & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 189–229). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Farmer, T. A., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2006). Phonological typicality influences lexical processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 12203–12208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, E. (1984). English word stress. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H., Landau, B., & Wanner, E. (1988). Where learning begins: Initial representations for language learning. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey (Vol. 3, pp. 150–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. New York: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1982). Why are nouns learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language development, Vol. 2: Language, thought, and culture. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (2006). Why verbs are hard to learn. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 544–564). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauerwas, L. B., & Walker, J. (2003). Spelling of inflected verb morphology in children with spelling deficits. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide range achievement test-revised 3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1987). Function and process in comparing language and cognition. In M. Hickmann (Ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought (pp. 185–202). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. H. (1988). Phonological biases in grammatical category shifts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99, 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. H., & Bock, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. H., Morris, J., & Verrekia, L. (1998). Orthographic cues to lexical stress: Effects on naming and lexical decision. Memory and Cognition, 26, 822–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2003). Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. Child Development, 74, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2003). Is English spelling chaotic? Misconceptions concerning its irregularity. Reading Psychology, 24, 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Y. (1983). It’s frogs all the way down. Cognition, 15, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 42, Serial No. 174.

  • Maratsos, M. (1983). Some current issues in the study of the acquisition of grammar. In P. Mussen, J. H. Flavell, & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 709–777). New York: Wiley.

  • Monaghan, P., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). The differential contribution of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorization. Cognition, 96, 143–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2007). The Phonological-Distributional Coherence Hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 55(4), 259–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. (1996). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. L., Meier, R. P., & Newport, E. L. (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 498–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. L., Shi, R., & Allopenna, P. (1996). Perceptual bases of rudimentary categories: Towards a broader conceptualization of bootstrapping. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 263–283). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dowd, S. C. (1984). Does vocabulary decline qualitatively in old age? Educational Gerontology, 10, 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech, 31, 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996a). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996b). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., & Barrueco, S. (1997). Incidental language learning: Listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science, 8, 101–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2007). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Conflicting cues in marking plural adjectives in Hebrew. Paper Presented at XIV Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Prague.

  • Shi, R., Morgan, J., & Allopenna, P. (1998). Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 25, 169–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. T., & Baker, R. G. (1976). The influence of English spelling patterns on pronunciation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 15, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. T., Baker, R. G., & Groat, A. (1982). Spelling as a source of information about children’s linguistic knowledge. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soreno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1990). Phonological and form class relations in the lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., Rigault, A., & Segalowitz, N. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speakers’ skill with grammatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 7, 312–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valtin, R. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness in children learning to read and write. In J. Downing & R. Valtin (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 207–226). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. D. (1988). The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, version 2. Behavioural Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nenagh Kemp.

Appendix

Appendix

Pseudoword triplets for noun, verb, and control endings

Cue

Group 1 pseudowords

Group 2 pseudowords

Group 3 pseudowords

Noun endings

-ac

chilac

tresac

gromac

-asm

lurdasm

torlasm

mirtasm

-iff

borniff

darniff

kriliff

-int

sharint

tromint

bretint

-ion

ellion

arnion

estion

-ior

telior

sudior

ganior

-is

welkis

fintis

barmis

-ium

lorium

sedium

lotium

-oon

rintoon

sorpoon

tensoon

-ush

stinush

pretush

sartush

Verb endings

-aim

artaim

erlaim

ursaim

-ede

monede

telede

ramede

-erge

sonerge

roserge

toperge

-erve

asgerve

olverve

inderve

-ieve

lotieve

carieve

senieve

-oice

intoice

arnoice

olnoice

-olve

panolve

warolve

fetolve

-ounce

ilounce

etounce

asounce

-act

tanact

lotact

saract

-end

sanend

futend

torend

Control endings

-ide

tramide

prelide

droside

-eal

sadeal

woreal

tiseal

-old

fanold

perold

tagold

-eat

saneat

tudeat

poleat

-ear

tarnear

gormear

lerdear

-ense

estense

ordense

arlense

-ust

pitust

monust

narust

-ate

pormate

cantate

sordate

-en

praten

spanen

frinen

-ert

promert

trenert

spanert

  1. Note: According to both MRC and CELEX databases, all noun endings selected occur in two-syllable nouns 100% of the time (but some unnoted examples seem to exist, e.g., festoon is a verb), and all verb endings selected occur in two-syllable nouns 100% of the time, except for -act (93%) and -end (86%)

Grammatical Awareness Task (answers in bold)

Mean percentage of participants who answered each item correctly shown in parentheses.

Practice items

  • a) Did you see her lovely scarf?/Did you see her lovely scarves?

  •    Did you see his old boot?/Did you see his old boots?

  • b) He chooses his socks carefully./He chose his socks carefully.

  •    He goes down the stairs quietly./He went down the stairs quietly

Verb items

  • 1. The creatures cling to the rocks./The creatures clung to the rocks.

  •    The creatures seek the sunlight./The creatures sought the sunlight. (69)

  • 2. Bill has a tantrum every week./Bill has had a tantrum every week.

  •    Bill quits his job every week./Bill has quit his job every week. (85)

  • 3. Monty wore a woolly jumper./Monty wears a woolly jumper.

  •    Monty bred angora rabbits. /Monty breeds angora rabbits. (91)

  • 4. I have caught the early train./I catch the early train regularly.

  •    I have risen at 6am./I rise at 6am regularly. (85)

  • 5. You trod on my doona./You tread on my doona all the time.

  •    You lay on my bed. /You lie on my bed all the time. (54)

  • 6. Peter has laid the paving stones./Peter lays the paving stones.

  •    Peter has striven to make them smooth./Peter strives to make them smooth. (78)

  • 7. Joan catches the children peeking. /Joan caught the children peeking.

  •    Joan forbids them to peek again./Joan forbade them to peek again. (45)

  • 8. The critics see three films./The critics have seen three films.

  •    The critics broadcast their reviews. /The critics have broadcast their reviews. (64)

Noun items

  • 1. I saw the farmer’s sheaf of wheat./I saw the farmer’s sheaves of wheat.

  •    I saw the cow’s latest offspring./I saw the cow’s latest offspring. (73)

  • 2. Look at that wild deer./Look at those wild deer.

  •    And look at that wild ox!/And look at those wild oxen! (39)

  • 3. I was sure I could taste the spices./I was sure I could taste the spice.

  •    I was sure I could see the lice./I was sure I could see the louse. (16)

  • 4. Have you heard of this species?/Have you heard of those species?

  •    Did you know about this crisis?/Did you know about these crises? (15)

  • 5. I’m sure that was an owl over there./I’m sure that was an owlet over there.

  •    I’m sure that was a goose over there./I’m sure that was a gosling over there. (40)

  • 6. Mr Bentley sat in the kitchen./Mr Bentley sat in the kitchenette.

  •    Mr Bentley pointed to the pig./Mr Bentley pointed to the piglet. (55)

  • 7. The one in charge was the priest./The one in charge was the priestess.

  •    The one who came was a widower./The one who came was a widow. (39)

  • 8. It would take a heroine to save the day./It would take a hero to save the day.

  •    It would take a sorceress to break the spell./It would take a sorcerer(63)

Mean percentage of Noun/Verb attribution given by participants to each pseudoword, in each task type. N = 25 for each pseudoword, or N = 17 for values given in italics.

 

Task type

Sentence construction

Sentence judgement

Pseudoword judgement

Noun

Verb

Noun

Verb

Noun

Verb

Noun-like triplets

-ac

chilac

64

24

92

8

77

23

tresac

84

16

65

35

88

12

gromac

65

24

40

60

76

24

-asm

lurdasm

80

20

64

59

71

29

torlasm

76

6

41

24

68

32

mirtasm

88

4

76

36

68

32

-iff

borniff

52

32

64

36

59

41

darniff

40

36

65

35

64

36

kriliff

77

24

52

48

76

24

-int

sharint

60

32

64

36

65

35

tromint

44

48

65

35

76

24

bretint

30

35

56

44

72

28

-ion

ellion

92

4

80

20

82

18

arnion

64

24

71

29

68

32

estion

94

6

68

32

80

20

-ior

telior

64

24

72

28

76

24

sudior

64

24

35

65

72

28

ganior

82

12

52

48

64

36

-is

welkis

76

16

76

24

71

29

fintis

72

12

71

29

60

40

barmis

60

18

64

36

76

24

-ium

lorium

88

4

68

32

77

23

sedium

84

12

71

29

80

20

lotium

94

6

64

36

76

24

-oon

rintoon

68

28

64

36

77

23

sorpoon

68

24

65

35

72

28

tensoon

77

12

44

56

76

24

-ush

stinush

60

24

60

40

41

59

pretush

56

36

71

29

40

60

sartush

65

24

40

60

64

36

Verb-like triplets

 

-aim

artaim

48

28

40

60

77

23

erlaim

60

32

77

23

52

48

ursaim

77

23

68

32

44

56

-ede

monede

84

12

48

52

24

76

telede

48

40

47

53

48

52

ramede

59

29

68

32

48

52

-erge

sonerge

48

40

52

48

53

47

roserge

80

16

76

24

36

64

toperge

82

18

36

64

20

80

-erve

asgerve

36

40

44

56

18

82

olverve

36

52

53

47

24

76

inderve

29

65

64

36

16

84

-ieve

lotieve

56

40

52

48

24

76

carieve

48

44

35

65

52

48

senieve

29

41

44

56

20

80

-oice

intoice

44

48

60

40

35

65

arnoice

68

12

53

47

56

44

olnoice

53

18

52

48

28

72

-olve

panolve

48

48

52

48

29

71

warolve

60

32

65

35

32

68

fetolve

47

35

52

48

20

80

-ounce

ilounce

16

80

40

60

12

88

etounce

32

60

59

41

0

100

asounce

29

65

36

64

8

92

-act

tanact

52

32

68

32

59

41

lotact

64

32

47

53

48

52

saract

58

24

52

48

64

36

-end

sanend

60

32

52

48

41

59

futend

52

40

53

47

44

56

torend

35

53

44

56

40

60

Control triplets

 

-ide

tramide

56

20

52

48

35

65

prelide

36

56

82

18

60

40

droside

41

29

24

76

40

60

-eal

sadeal

60

20

64

36

53

47

woreal

52

32

53

47

48

52

tiseal

47

35

56

44

72

28

-old

fanold

44

44

72

28

65

35

perold

60

24

59

41

92

8

tagold

65

24

48

52

72

28

-eat

saneat

60

24

68

32

53

47

tudeat

64

24

59

41

64

36

poleat

60

24

80

20

56

44

-ear

tarnear

68

20

60

40

82

18

gormear

48

32

47

53

48

52

lerdear

60

29

40

60

56

44

-ense

estense

40

24

80

20

24

76

ordense

36

16

59

41

40

60

arlense

65

24

52

48

36

64

-ust

pitust

48

36

72

28

53

47

monust

56

28

59

41

60

40

narust

65

18

68

32

76

24

-ate

pormate

40

44

36

64

23

77

cantate

48

48

53

47

20

80

sordate

41

53

32

68

28

72

-en

praten

52

32

52

48

71

29

spanen

76

20

65

35

60

40

frinen

47

29

76

24

72

28

-ert

promert

32

40

60

40

47

53

trenert

60

20

47

53

72

28

spanert

65

30

80

20

32

68

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemp, N., Nilsson, J. & Arciuli, J. Noun or verb? Adult readers’ sensitivity to spelling cues to grammatical category in word endings. Read Writ 22, 661–685 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9140-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9140-z

Keywords

Navigation