Abstract
The research reported here employed a multiple-case study methodology to assess the online cognitive and metacognitive activities of 15-year-old secondary students as they read informational texts and wrote a new text in order to learn, and the relation of these activities to the written products they were asked to generate. To investigate the influence of the task, students were required to perform two different tasks which differed in complexity and familiarity. The first task was reading a single text and making a written summary of it, while the second consisted in reading two texts and making a written synthesis of them. To gather information about how students construct meaning from informational texts, we asked students to think aloud as they read and wrote in order to provide us with information about their comprehension and composition processes. We also examined their reading and writing activities during the tasks. The results show that to a large extent secondary school students lack the cognitive and metacognitive processes that would enable them to make strategic use of reading and writing. They also show that, although there are no major differences in the way secondary school students tackle these different tasks, those who create the most elaborate products evidence a more recursive and flexible use of reading and writing. The most obvious conclusion as far as the repercussions of these findings are concerned is that there is an urgent need for work on tasks of this kind in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2004). Observational learning and its effects on the orchestration of writing processes. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 1–36.
Bräten, I., & Stromso, H. I. (2003). A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 195–218.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1–14.
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M. H., & Christian Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Chueca, F. (1970). Breve historia del urbanismo. Madrid: Editorial Alianza.
Cornoldi, C., & Oakhill, J. (Eds.) (1996). Reading comprehension difficulties. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coté, N., Goldman, S., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1–53.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev.ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Flower, L., Stein, V., Ackerman, J., Kantz, M. J., McCormick, K., & Peck, W. C. (1990). Reading-to-write. Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.
González Nieto, L. (2002). El aprendizaje de la Lengua. In A. Marchesi, & E. Martín (Eds.), Evaluación de la educación secundaria. Fotografía de una etapa polémica (pp. 179–196). Madrid: Ediciones SM.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994). The role and development of self-regulation in the writing process. In D. Schunk, & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 203–228). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and learning challenging. In M. C. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 347–360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.
Hartman, D. K. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 520–561.
Hynd-Shanahan, C., Holschuch, J., & Hubbard, B. (2004). Thinking like a historian: College students’ reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 141–176.
Janssen, D., van Waes, L., & van den Bergh, H. (1996). Effects of thinking aloud on writing processes. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 233–250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kirkland, M. R., & Saunders, M. A. P. (1991). Maximizing student performance in summary writing: Managing cognitive load. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 105–121.
Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning (Research Report No. 22). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Lenski, S. D., & Johns, J. L. (1997). Patterns of reading-to-write. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 15–38.
Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (1996). Writing signatures. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 149–161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marchesi, A., & Martín, E. (Eds.) (2002). Evaluación de la educación secundaria. Fotografía de una etapa polémica. Madrid: Ediciones SM.
McGinley, W. (1992). The role of reading and writing while composing from multiple sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 227–248.
OCDE (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive Summary. Retrieved from https://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf. On June 30, 2005.
Piquer, I. (January 7, 2000). España necesitará 12 millones de inmigrantes de aquí al año 2050, según la ONU. El País, p. 24.
Pozo, J. I., & Monereo, C. (1999). Introducción: Un currículo para aprender. Profesores, alumnos y contenidos ante el aprendizaje estratégico. In J. I. Pozo, & C. Monereo (Eds.), El aprendizaje estratégico. Enseñar a aprender desde el currículum (pp. 11–32). Madrid: Santillana.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Riera, I. (2002). Emigrantes y refugiados. Barcelona: Intermón.
Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (1996). An agenda for research into an interactive compensatory model of writing: Many questions, some answers. In C. M. Levy, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 107–126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2006). Writing process theory: A functional dynamic approach. In C. A. McArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Segev-Miller, R. (2004a). Writing from sources: The effect of explicit instruction on college students’ processes and products. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 4, 5–53.
Segev-Miller, R. (2004b). Writing to learn: Conducting a process log. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching of writing. Vol. 14: Studies in writing (2nd ed., pp. 33–546). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Solé, I. (2005). PISA, la lectura y sus lecturas. Aula de Innovación Educativa, 139, 22–27.
Solé, I., Mateos, M., Miras, M., Martín, E., Castells, N., Cuevas, I., & Gràcia, M. (2005). Lectura, escritura y adquisición de conocimiento en educación secundaria y educación universitaria. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 28, 329–347.
Spivey, N. N. (1997). Reading, writing and the making of meaning. The constructivist metaphor. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Spivey, N. N., & King, J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7–26.
Stahl, S., Hynd, C., Britton, B., McNish, M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430–457.
Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1996). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 246–280). New York: Longman.
Torrance, M. (1996). Is writing expertise like other kinds of expertise? In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 3–9). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Tynjälä, P. (2001). Writing, learning and the development of expertise in higher education. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
Zárate, A., & Sánchez, J. (2003). Geografía. Madrid: Ediciones SM.
Acknowledgements
The research project was funded under the General Programme for the Promotion of Knowledge 2005–2008 by the Spanish Ministry of Education (SEJ2005-08434-C02-01/EDUC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mateos, M., Martín, E., Villalón, R. et al. Reading and writing to learn in secondary education: online processing activity and written products in summarizing and synthesizing tasks. Read Writ 21, 675–697 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9086-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9086-6