Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine factors that influence students’ reading of derived words. Recent research suggests that the lexical quality of a derived word depends on the familiarity of the word, its morphemic constituents (i.e., base word and affixes), and the frequency with which the base word appears in other words (i.e., members of the same word family or family frequency). On the premise that better and more experienced readers have higher quality lexical representations, we explore the extent to which accuracy of reading derived words by 4th and 6th graders is related to measures of familiarity, including derived and base word frequencies, family size, average family frequency, and word length. The results of an exploratory factor analysis indicated that these measures formed two factors, one representing morphemic constitution and the second representing exposure to the word family; both factors accounted for significant variance in the students’ derived word reading. Comparisons of sets of derived words contrasted on familiarity properties showed that performance on derived words, overall, is better for 6th than 4th graders and for good than poor readers. On the measures of family frequency and family size, there were significant discrepancies between grade level and reading ability and frequency characteristics. These add support to the view that morphemic analysis and wide reading experience contribute to derived word reading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berninger V. B., Nagy W. E., Carlisle J. F., Thomson J., Hoffer D., Abbott S., Abbott R., Richards T. and Aylward E. (2003). Effective treatment for children with dyslexia in grades 4–6: Behavioral and brain evidence. In: Foorman, B. (eds) Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale, pp 381–347. York Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram R., Baayen R. H. and Schreuder R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12: 169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle J. F. and Stone C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly 40: 428–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle J. F., Stone C. A. and Katz L. A. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia 51: 249–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J. B., Davies P. and Richman B. (1971). Word frequency book. American Heritage Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri L. C. (1998). Grapheme–phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In: Metsala, J. L. and Ehri, L. C. (eds) Word recognition in beginning literacy, pp 3–40. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler A. E. and Liberman I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In: Feldman, L. B. (eds) Morphological aspects of language processing, pp 157–188. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen J. R. and Kroll J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2: 361–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong C. K. (1989). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers. Annals of Dyslexia 39: 94–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann V. and Singson M. (2003). Linking morphological knowledge to English decoding ability: Large effects of little suffixes. In: Assink, E. M. H. and Sandra, D. (eds) Reading complex words: Cross-linguistic studies, pp 1–25. Kluwer Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy W. E. and Anderson R. (1984). How many words in printed school English?. Reading Research Quarterly 19: 304–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy W. E., Anderson R., Schommer M., Scott J. A. and Stallman A. C. (1989). Morphological families and word recognition. Reading Research Quarterly 24: 262–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In: Gough, P., Ehri, L. and Treiman, R. (eds) Reading acquisition, pp 107–143. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti C. A. and Hart L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In: Gorfien, D. S. (eds) On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity, pp 67–86. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle E. D. and Perfetti C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading 7: 219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder R. and Baayen R. H. (1997). How complex simple words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 36: 118–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder R., Burani C. and Baayen H. (2003). Parsing and semantic opacity. In: Assink, E. M. H. and Sandra, D. (eds) Reading complex words: Cross-language studies, pp 159–189. Kluwer Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Singson M., Mahoney D. and Mann V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12: 219–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 7: 263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In: Assink, E. G. H. and Sandra, D. (eds) Reading complex words: Cross language studies, pp 113–137. Kluwer Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft M. and Zhu X. (1995). The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. In: Feldman, L. B. (eds) Morphological aspects of language processing, pp 293–316. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven L., Baayen H. and Schreuder R. (2004). Orthographic constraints and frequency effects in complex word identification. Written language and literacy 7: 49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock R. W. and Mather N. (2000). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-III. Riverside, Itasca, IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne F. Carlisle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlisle, J.F., Katz, L.A. Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words. Read Writ 19, 669–693 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2

Keywords

Navigation