Abstract
This study examined whether children’s reading rate, comprehension, and recall are affected by computer presentation of text. Participants were 60 grade five students, who each read two expository texts, one in a traditional print format and the other from a computer monitor, which used a common scrolling text interface. After reading each text, participants were asked to recall as much as they could from what they had read and then answered questions that measured text recall and comprehension. Children took more time to read the passage and recalled more of the text material that they had read from the computer monitor. The benefit of computer presentation disappeared when efficiency variables, which take time into account, were examined. Children were, however, more efficient at comprehending text when reading from paper. The results suggest that children may take more time to read text on computer screens and that they are more efficient when reading text on paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An organism that is visible from space. (n.d.). Retrieved July 15, 2001, from http://www.pitara.com
T. Baccino J. Pynte (1994) ArticleTitleSpatial coding and discourse models during text reading Language and Cognitive Processes 9 143–155
R.P. Carver (1990) Reading rate: A review of research and theory Academic Press San Diego, California
R.P. Carver (1997) ArticleTitleReading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory Scientific Studies of Reading 1 3–43 Occurrence Handle10.1207/s1532799xssr0101_2
M.S. Castelhano P. Muter (2001) ArticleTitleOptimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presentation Behaviour and Information Technology 20 237–247
M.G. Cataldo J. Oakhill (2000) ArticleTitleWhy are poor comprehenders inefficient searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text Journal of Educational Psychology 92 791–799
R.E. Clark (1994) ArticleTitleMedia will never influence learning Educational Technology Research and Development 42 IssueID2 21–29
R.E. Clark B.M. Sugrue (1990) ArticleTitleNorth American disputes about research on learning from media International Journal of Educational Research 14 507–519
T.G. Cocklin N.J. Ward H. Chen J.F. Juola (1984) ArticleTitleFactors influencing readability of rapidly presented text segments Memory and Cognition 12 431–442
A. Creed I. Dennis S. Newstead (1987) ArticleTitleProof-reading on VDU’s Behaviour and Information Technology 6 3–13
A. Dillon J. Richardson C. McKnight (1990) ArticleTitleThe effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen Behaviour and Information Technology 9 215–227
A. Dillon (1992) ArticleTitleReading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature Ergonomics 35 1297–1326
T.D. Duffy A.K. Bednar (1991) ArticleTitleAttempting to come to grips with alternative perspectives Educational Technology 31 IssueID9 12–15
K.S. Eklundh (1992) ArticleTitleProblems in achieving a global perspective of the text in computerbased writing Instructional Science 21 73–84 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00119656
E.B. Fry (1975) Fry readability scale Jamestown Provincetown, Rhode Island
J.D. Gould N. Grischkowsky (1984) ArticleTitleDoing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (crt) computer terminals Human Factors 26 323–337
M.J. Jacobson C. Maouri P. Mishra C. Kolar (1995) ArticleTitleLearning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 4 321–364
M.J. Jacobson R.J. Spiro (1995) ArticleTitleHypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation Journal of Educational Computing Research 12 301–333
D.H. Jonassen (1993) Effects of semantically structured hypertext knowledge bases on users’ knowledge structures C. McKnight A. Dillon J. Richardson (Eds) Hypertext: A psychological perspective Ellis Horwood Chichester, West Sussex, England
M.T. Jong Particlede A.G. Bus (2002) ArticleTitleQuality of book-reading for emergent readers: An experiment with the same book in a regular or electronic format Journal of Educational Psychology 94 145–155
S. Kalyuga P. Chandler J. Sweller (1999) ArticleTitleManaging split attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 351–371 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4<351::AID-ACP589>3.0.CO;2-6
R.E. Mayer R. Moreno (1998) ArticleTitleA split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory Journal of Educational Psychology 90 312–320 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312
C. McKnight A. Dillon J. Richardson (1990) A comparison of linear and hypertext formats in information retrieval R. McAleese C. Green (Eds) State of the art Intellect Oxford
R. Moreno R.E. Mayer (1999) ArticleTitleCognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity Journal of Educational Psychology 91 358–368 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
D. Moseley N. Mearns H. Tse (2001) ArticleTitleUsing computers at home and in the primary school: Where is the value added? Educational and Child Psychology 18 31–46
P. Muter R.S. Kruk M.A. Buttigieg J.T. Kang (1988) ArticleTitleReader-controlled computerized presentation of text Human Factors 30 473–486
P. Muter S.A. Latremouille W. C. Treurniet P. Beam (1982) ArticleTitleExtended reading of continuous text on television screens Human Factors 24 501–508
P. Muter P. Maurutto (1991) ArticleTitleReading and skimming from computer screens and books: The paperless office revisited? Behaviour and Information Technology 10 257–266
A. Piolat J. Roussey O. Thunin (1997) ArticleTitleEffects of screen presentation on text reading and revising International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47 565–589 Occurrence Handle10.1006/ijhc.1997.0145
T. Rahman P. Muter (1999) ArticleTitleDesigning an interface to optimize reading with small display windows Human Factors 41 106–117
J.-F. Rouet (1992) Cognitive processing of hyperdocuments: When does non-linearity help? D. Lucarella J. Nanard M. Nanard P. Paolini (Eds) Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Hypertext Academic Press New York, New York
Slosson, R.L. & Nicholson, C.L. (1990). Slosson Oral Reading Test - revised. East Aurora, New York: Slosson Educational Publications. The art of deception (n.d.). Retrieved July 15, 2001, from http://www.pitara.com
M.J. Wenger D.G. Payne (1996) ArticleTitleComprehension and retention of nonlinear text: Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing The American Journal of Psychology 109 93–130
R.T. Wilkinson H.M. Robinshaw (1987) ArticleTitleProof reading: VDU and paper text compared for speed, accuracy and fatigue Behaviour and Information Technology 6 125–133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerr, M.A., Symons, S.E. Computerized Presentation of Text: Effects on Children’s Reading of Informational Material. Read Writ 19, 1–19 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-003-8128-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-003-8128-y