Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization and clean synthesis of biodiesel from Rumex crispus leaves using calcium oxide derived from mango seed shell as a nanocatalyst

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the synthesis of biodiesel through transesterification reaction of non-edible extracted oil from a cheap Rumex crispus leaves using a methanol alcohol in the presence of a nanocatalyst calcium oxide derived from mango seed shell. In line with this the synthesized calcium oxide nanocatalyst were characterized for structural patterns functional group, and energy band gab energy using XRD, FTIR and UV–Vis spectra. The effects of transesterification parameters; methanol to oil molar ratio, reaction temperature, reaction time, and catalyst loading on biodiesel yield were investigated and optimized by using a Response Surface Methodology (RSM) typically Central Composite Design (CCD). The catalyst loading turned out to be the most significant parameter with 93.72%. A 8:1 molar ratio of methanol to oil, a catalyst loading of 1.5 wt%, a reaction temperature of 65 °C and a reaction time of 3 h determines optimal conditions for the conversion of R. crispus leave oil to biodiesel yield of up to 93.72%. Under these conditions, the predicted and experimental biodiesel yields were 93.72% and 94.18%, respectively. The R2 value of the model was 0.9855, indicating the accuracy of the model. The biodiesel characterization parameters met the biodiesel specifications of European Standard (EN) EN14214 and characterized by GC–MS and FTIR analysis. The biodiesel produced from R. crispus leaves oil as an alternative energy source could be utilized as a substitute for fossil fuels for a variety of purposes while also improving sustainable energy utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The availability of data, i.e., experimental design, data analysis (RSM), FTIR, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) used to support the results of this study are incorporated in the article.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CaO:

Calcium oxide

CCD:

Central composite design

FTIR:

Fourier transforms infrared

GC–MS:

Gas chromatographs–mass spectroscopy

FAC:

Fatty acids

RSM:

Response surface methodology centered

References

  1. Palani Y, Devarajan C, Manickam D, Thanikodi S (2022) Performance and emission characteristics of biodiesel-blend in diesel engine. A review. Environ Eng Res 27(1):200338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmia AC, Danane F, Bessah R, Boumesbah I (2014) Raw material for biodiesel production. Valorization of used edible oil. J Renew Energies 17(2):335–343

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bayisa YM, Bullo TA, Hundie KB (2022) Optimizing process parameter for biodiesel production from avocado peel oil using chicken eggshell biocatalysts using central composite design (CCD). Reac Kinet Mech Cat 135(6):3185–3203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zulqarnain, Mohd Yusoff MH, Ayoub M, Ramzan N, Nazir MH, Zahid I, Butt TA (2021) Overview of feedstocks for sustainable biodiesel production and implementation of the biodiesel program in Pakistan. ACS Omega 6(29):19099–19114

  5. Adeniyi AG, Ighalo JO, Adeoye AS, Onifa DV (2019) Modelling and optimisation of biodiesel production from Euphorbia lathyris using ASPEN Hysys. SN Appl Sci 1(11):1452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Olagunju OA, Musonge P, Kiambi SL (2022) Production and optimization of biodiesel in a membrane reactor using a solid base catalyst. Membranes 12(7):674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dharma S, Hassan MH, Ong HC, Sebayang AH, Silitonga AS, Kusumo F (2017) Optimization of biodiesel production from mixed Jatropha curcasCeiba pentandra using artificial neural network-genetic algorithm: evaluation of reaction kinetic models. Chem Eng Trans 56:547–552

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anwar M, Rasul M, Ashwath N, Rahman M (2018) Optimisation of second-generation biodiesel production from Australian native stone fruit oil using response surface method. Energies 11:2566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmia AC, Danane F, Bessah R, Boumesbah I (2014) Raw material for biodiesel production Valorization of used edible oil. J Renew Energies 17(2):335–343

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fan X, Wang X, Chen F (2011) Biodiesel production from crude cottonseed oil: an optimization process using response surface methodology. Open Fuels Energy Sci J 4(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iqbal MF, Shad GM, Feng YL, Liu MC, Wang S, Lu XR, Tariq M (2019) Efficacy of postemergence herbicides for controlling curled dock (Rumex crispus L.) in wheat crops. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(6):12753–12767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amini R, Bahmani Y, Amjadi E, Nazari Z (2015) Effect of salinity and crop residue on seed germination and early seedling growth of curled dock (Rumex crispus L.). Int J Plant Anim Environ Sci 5(1):68–73

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bullo TA, Bayisa YM, Bultum MS (2022) Biosynthesis of sulfonated carbon catalyst from carbohydrate polymer derivatives for epoxidation of Croton macrostachyus seed oil. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 3:100221

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bullo TA, Bayisa YM, Bultum MS (2022) Optimization and biosynthesis of calcined chicken eggshell doped titanium dioxide photocatalyst based nanoparticles for wastewater treatment. SN Appl Sci 4(1):17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Talebian-Kiakalaieh A, Amin NA, Mazaheri H (2013) A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Appl Energy 104:683–710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta J, Agarwal M, Dalai AK (2016) Optimization of biodiesel production from mixture of edible and nonedible vegetable oils. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 8:112–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Habte L, Shiferaw N, Mulatu D, Thenepalli T, Chilakala R, Ahn JW (2019) Synthesis of nano-calcium oxide from waste eggshell by sol–gel method. Sustainability 11(11):3196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Panichikkal AF, Prakasan P, Kizhakkepowathial Nair U, Kulangara Valappil M (2018) Optimization of parameters for the production of biodiesel from rubber seed oil using onsite lipase by response surface methodology. Biotech 8:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  19. El-Gendy NS, Deriase SF, Hamdy A, Abdallah RI (2015) Statistical optimization of biodiesel production from sunflower waste cooking oil using basic heterogeneous biocatalyst prepared from eggshells. Egypt J Pet 24(1):37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foroutan R, Mohammadi R, Ramavandi B (2021) Waste glass catalyst for biodiesel production from waste chicken fat: optimization by RSM and ANNs and toxicity assessment. Fuel 291:120–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajesh K, Devan PK, Bharth Sai Kumar GK (2021) Parametric optimization and biodiesel production from coconut fatty acid distillate. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 40(1):343–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. El Boulifi N, Bouaid A, Martinez M, Aracil J (2010) Process optimization for biodiesel production from corn oil and its oxidative stability. Int J Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/518070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foroutan R, Mohammadi R, Esmaeili H, Bektashi FM, Tamjidi S (2020) Transesterification of waste edible oils to biodiesel using calcium oxide@ magnesium oxide nanocatalyst. Waste Manag 105:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lakshmana Naik R, Radhika N, Sravani K, Hareesha A, Mohanakumari B, Bhavanasindhu K (2015) Optimized parameters for production of biodiesel from fried oil. Int Adv Res J Sci Eng Technol 2(6):62–65

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hundie KB, Shumi LD, Bullo TA (2022) Investigation of biodiesel production parameters by transesterification of watermelon waste oil using definitive screening design and produced biodiesel characterization. S Afr J Chem Eng 41:140–149

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bullo TA, Fana FB (2021) Production and characterization of biodiesel from avocado peel oils using experimental analysis (ANOVA). J Eng Adv 2(02):104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aworanti OA, Agarry SE, Ajani AO (2013) Statistical optimization of process variables for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using heterogeneous base catalyst. Br Biotechnol J 3(2):116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh D, Kumar V, Sandhu SS, Sarma AK (2016) Process optimization for biodiesel production from indigenous non-edible Prunus armeniaca oil. Adv Energy Res 4(3):189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bai L, Tajikfar A, Tamjidi S, Foroutan R, Esmaeili H (2021) Synthesis of MnFe2O4@ graphene oxide catalyst for biodiesel production from waste edible oil. Renew Energy 170:426–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dharma SM, Masjuki HH, Ong HC, Sebayang AH, Silitonga AS, Kusumo F, Mahlia TM (2016) Optimization of biodiesel production process for mixed Jatropha curcasCeiba pentandra biodiesel using response surface methodology. Energy Convers Manag 115:178–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Elkady MF, Zaatout A, Balbaa O (2015) Production of biodiesel from waste vegetable oil via KM micromixer. J Chem 2015:630168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeyakumar N, Narayanasamy B, Venkatraman B (2021) Optimisation of biodiesel production from jack fruit seed oil using response surface methodology. Int J Ambient Energy 42(16):1864–1875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the FT-IR Platform at the Faculty of Material Science and Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering Laboratory staff members at Jimma Institute of Technology for their knowledge sharing and technical support. This work was financially supported by the Jimma Institute of Technology Center of Excellence-CRGE RESOURCE CART (Climate Resilient Green Economy Resource Centre for Advanced Research and Training-Linking Energy with Water and Agriculture).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors: TA wrote the main parts of the manuscript, YM, EB and VR have made a substantial contribution in conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, designed the study and procedure, interpretation of the data, conducting lab testing, visualization, validation, analysis of FT-IR spectroscopy, and GC–MS analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tafere Aga Bullo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not include human or animal studies conducted by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Consent to participate in the study was also obtained at the individual level.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bullo, T.A., Bayisa, Y.M., Jiru, E.B. et al. Optimization and clean synthesis of biodiesel from Rumex crispus leaves using calcium oxide derived from mango seed shell as a nanocatalyst. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 136, 2955–2975 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-023-02493-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-023-02493-x

Keywords

Navigation