Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable green biogas production from pretreated wheat straw blended with coffee husk using neem leaves-based iron (III) nanocatalyst via response surface methodology

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the enhancement of wheat straw and coffee husk waste used as a biogas source for energy production using iron nanocatalysts from neem leaf extract. In line with this the synthesized neem leaves extract of Iron nanocatalyst was characterized for the morphological and functional group. To achieve this, thermal acid pretreatment was carried out using equal proportions of blended wheat straw with coffee husks and subjected to the anaerobic digester with 0.3 g/L of neem leave extract Fe–O nanocatalyst to improve biogas production. The influence of temperature, the concentration of Sulfuric acid, and cooking time during the pretreatment to improve biogas yield was investigated. Response surface methodology of Box–Behnken Design (BBD) during the thermochemical pretreatment is employed. The biomass was pretreated at 160 °C temperatures, 3% concentration of sulfuric acid, and 30 min of cooking time. The highest cumulative biogas and biomethane obtained from the biomass were 764 mL/g and 460 mL/g Volatile solid. Augmentation of neem leaves extract of Iron nanocatalyst enhanced the methane gas yield with volatile solids up to 89.5%. Therefore, the use of pretreatment for the catalysis of lignocellulose substrates is advantageous for the creation of a process that is both economical and environmentally friendly. The produced biogas energy could be used as a substitute for fossil fuels for various purposes while mitigating important environmental pollution problems and enhancing sustainable energy utilization. In considering ‘waste to energy’ for the production of sustainable energy from waste and fulfilling the energy demand is possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declares that the data supporting the findings of this investigation are included in the manuscript.

References

  1. Shah G, Ahmad E, Pant KK, Vijay VK (2020) Comprehending the contemporary state of art in biogas enrichment and CO2 capture technologies via swing adsorption. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:6588–6666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prabhu AV, Avinash A, Brindhadevi K, Pugazhendhi A (2021) Performance and emission evaluation of dual fuel CI engine using preheated biogas-air mixture. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yadav M, Vivekanand V (2021) Combined fungal and bacterial pretreatment of wheat and pearl millet straw for biogas production. A study from batch to continuous stirred tank reactors. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustafsson M, Anderberg S (2021) Dimensions and characteristics of biogas policies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarip H, SohrabHossain M, Mohamad Azemi MNN, Allaf K (2016) A review of the thermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass towards glucose production: autohydrolysis with DIC technology. BioResources 11(4):10625–10653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ulukardeşler AH, Atalay FS (2018) Kinetic studies of biogas generation using chicken manure as feedstock. Politeknik Dergisi 21(4):913–917

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun C, Cao W, Banks CJ, Heaven S, Liu R (2016) Biogas production from undiluted chicken manure and maize silage: a study of ammonia inhibition in high solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresourse Technol 218:1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo T, Khoshnevisan B, Huang R, Chen Q, Mei Z, Pan J (2020) Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ioannou-ttofa L, Foteinis S, Seifelnasr A, Abdelsalam E, Samer M, Fatta-kassinos D (2021) Life cycle assessment of household biogas production in Egypt: in fl uence of digester volume, biogas leakages, and digestate valorization as biofertilizer. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gopal LC, Govindarajan M, Kavipriya MR, Mahboob S, Al-ghanim KA, Virik P (2020) Optimization strategies for improved biogas production by recycling of waste through response surface methodology and artificial neural network: sustainable energy perspective research. J King Saud Univ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2020.101241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y (2014) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baltrėnas P, Kolodynskij V, Urbanas D (2019) Biogas production from chicken manure at different organic loadings using a special zeolite additive (ZeoVit sorbent). J Renew Sustain Energy. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5119840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Voća N, Krička T, Ćosić T, Rupić V, Jukić Ž, Kalambura S (2005) Digested residue as a fertilizer after the mesophilic process of anaerobic digestion. Plant Soil Environ 51(6):262–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlini M, Castellucci S, Moneti M (2015) Biogas production from poultry manure and cheese whey wastewater under mesophilic conditions in batch reactor. Energy Procedia 82:811–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roman M, Kalam A, Rahman L, Rajibul M, Pulak A, Rouf A (2016) Production of biogas from poultry litter mixed with the co-substrate cow dung. Integr Med Res 10(4):497–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aminah S, Johari M, Aqsha A, Osman NB, Shamsudin MR, Ameen M (2020) Enhancing biogas production in anaerobic co—digestion of fresh chicken manure with corn stover at laboratory scale. SN Appl Sci 2(7):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3063-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Amin FR, Khalid H, Zhang H, Rahman S, Zhang R, Liu G (2017) Pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion. AMB Express. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0375-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao L, Sun ZF, Zhang CC, Nan J, Ren NQ, Lee DJ, Chen C (2022) Advances in pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy production: challenges and perspectives. Bioresource Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kist DL, Perez-Elvira SI, Monteggia LO (2017) Thermal hydrolysis pretreatment of Typha angustifolia: a decouple evaluation of liquid and solid phase effects on biomethanation process. Revista ESPACIOS 38(41):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  20. Montgomery LF, Bochmann G (2014) Pretreatment of feedstock for enhanced biogas production. Ireland: IEA Bioenergy.

  21. Rodriguez C, Alaswad A, Benyounis KY, Olabi AG (2017) Pretreatment techniques used in biogas production from grass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 68:1193–1204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hernández-Beltrán JU, Hernández-De Lira IO, Cruz-Santos MM, Saucedo-Luevanos A, Hernández-Terán F, Balagurusamy N (2019) Insight into pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass to increase biogas yield: current state, challenges, and opportunities. Appl Sci 9(18):1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rafiee A, Khalilpour KR, Prest J, Skryabin I (2021) Biogas as an energy vector. Biomass Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. García R, Gil MV, Rubiera F, Chen D, Pevida C (2021) Renewable hydrogen production from biogas by sorption enhanced steam reforming (SESR): a parametric study. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stürmer B, Leiers D, Anspach V, Brügging E, Scharfy D, Wissel T (2021) Agricultural biogas production: a regional comparison of technical parameters. Renew Energy 164:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Srivastava N, Srivastava KR, Bantun F, Mohammad A, Singh R, Pal DB, Mishra PK, Haque S, Gupta VK (2022) Improved production of biogas via microbial digestion of pressmud using CuO/Cu2O based nanocatalyst prepared from pressmud and sugarcane bagasse waste. Bioresource Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bharathi P, Dayana R, Rangaraju M, Varsha V, Subathra M, Sundramurthy VP (2022) Biogas production from food waste using nanocatalyst. J Nanomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7529036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khairy M, Zakaria W (2014) Effect of metal-doping of TiO2 nanoparticles on their photocatalytic activities toward removal of organic dyes. Egypt J Pet 23(4):419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2014.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bullo TA, Bayisa YM, Bultum MS (2022) Optimization and biosynthesis of calcined chicken eggshell doped titanium dioxide photocatalyst based nanoparticles for wastewater treatment. SN Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04900-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thiruselvi D, Yuvarani M, Salma A (2021) Enhanced biogas from sewage sludge digestion using iron nanocatalyst from Vitex negundo leaf extract: response surface modeling. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18:2161–2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02933-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Herold C, Ishika T, Nwoba EG, Tait S, Ward A, Moheimani NR (2021) Biomass and bioenergy biomass production of marine microalga Tetraselmis suecica using biogas and wastewater as nutrients. Biomass Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abdelwahab TAM, Fodah AEM (2022) Utilization of nanoparticles for biogas production focusing on process stability and effluent quality. SN Appl Sci 4:332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05222-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmed B, Aboudi K, Tyagi VK, Álvarez-Gallego CJ, Fernández-Güelfo LA, Romero-García LI, Kazmi AA (2019) Improvement of anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass by hydrothermal pretreatment. Appl Sci 9(18):3853. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Amarasinghe A, Wanniarachchi D (2019) Eco-friendly photocatalyst derived from egg shell waste for dye degradation. J Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8184732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hegazy AK, Abdel-Ghani NT, El-Chaghaby GA (2014) Adsorption of phenol onto activated carbon from Rhazya stricta: determination of the optimal experimental parameters using factorial design. Appl Water Sci 4:273–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the FT-IR platform at the Faculty of Material Science and Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, and the school of Chemical Engineering Laboratory staff members at Jimma Institute of Technology for their knowledge-sharing and technical support. This work was financially supported by the Jimma Institute of Technology Center of Excellence- CRGE RESOURCE CART (Climate Resilient Green Economy Resource Centre for Advanced Research and Training-Linking Energy with Water and Agriculture).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conceptualization of the research and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yigezu Mekonnen Bayisa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayisa, Y.M., Bullo, T.A., Jiru, E.B. et al. Sustainable green biogas production from pretreated wheat straw blended with coffee husk using neem leaves-based iron (III) nanocatalyst via response surface methodology. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 136, 1385–1405 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-023-02417-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-023-02417-9

Keywords

Navigation