Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of different nanocomposite carbon-based adsorbers on the adsorption desulfurization of dibenzothiophene in model oil and diesel fuel: a comparative study

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adsorption desulfurization of dibenzothiophene (DBT) in model oil was conducted in a batch-process and fixed-bed system by using four adsorbers: activated charcoal (AC), activated charcoal loaded with monometallic manganese (AC/Mn), activated charcoal loaded with monometallic copper (AC/Cu), and activated charcoal loaded with bimetallic manganese and copper (AC/Mn/Cu). The adsorbers are characterized by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM-EDS), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and N2 adsorption–desorption analysis. The sequence AC/Mn/Cu > AC/Mn > AC/Cu > AC has been obtained from the results of removing dibenzothiophene (DBT) in the model oil in batch-process. The adsorption capacities (qe) and sulfur removal percentages were equal to (136.78 mg g−1, 91.18%), (95.85 mg g−1, 63.9%), (83.25 mg g−1, 55.5%), (70.8 mg g−1, 47.2%). Additionally, in the fixed-bed system, AC/Mn/Cu adsorber has shown the best performance compared to the three other adsorbers and it only lost 34% of its efficiency after 300 min. The adsorption process of DBT on AC/Mn/Cu adsorber followed Pseudo-Second-Order kinetics and the Langmuir adsorption isotherm model. In the adsorption desulfurization of high-sulfur commercial diesel fuel in a fixed-bed system by AC/Mn/Cu adsorber, DBT has been completely removed and 99% of total sulfur decreased to 16 ppm.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sadare OO, Obazu F, Daramola MO (2017) Biodesulfurization of petroleum distillates—current status, opportunities and future challenges. Environments 4(4):85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wei Y et al (2018) Uncovering the culprits of air pollution: evidence from China’s economic sectors and regional heterogeneities. J Clean Prod 171:1481–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajendran A et al (2020) A comprehensive review on oxidative desulfurization catalysts targeting clean energy and environment. J MaterChem A 8(5):2246–2285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganiyu SA, Lateef SA (2021) Review of adsorptive desulfurization process: overview of the non-carbonaceous materials, mechanism and synthesis strategies. Fuel 294:120273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shafiq I et al (2020) Recent developments in alumina supported hydrodesulfurization catalysts for the production of sulfur-free refinery products: a technical review. Catal Rev 64:1–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmadian M, Anbia M (2021) Oxidative desulfurization of liquid fuels using polyoxometalate-based catalysts: a review. Energy Fuels 35(13):10347–10373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nassar HN, Abu Amr SS, El-Gendy NS (2021) Biodesulfurization of refractory sulfur compounds in petro-diesel by a novel hydrocarbon tolerable strain Paenibacillus glucanolyticus HN4. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(7):8102–8116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Makoś P, Boczkaj G (2019) Deep eutectic solvents based highly efficient extractive desulfurization of fuels–Eco-friendly approach. J Mol Liq 296:111916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang X-F et al (2018) Adsorptive desulfurization from the model fuels by functionalized UiO-66 (Zr). Fuel 234:256–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saha B, Vedachalam S, Dalai AK (2021) Review on recent advances in adsorptive desulfurization. Fuel Process Technol 214:106685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ullah S et al (2020) Desulfurization of model oil through adsorption over activated charcoal and bentonite clay composites. Chem Eng Technol 43(3):564–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu L et al (2019) Modification of zeolite by metal and adsorption desulfurization of organic sulfide in natural gas. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 69:102941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang B-L, Jiang N, Chang Y-X (2021) Synthesis of highly active Cu (I)-Y (III)-Y zeolite and its selective adsorption desulfurization performance in presence of xylene isomers. Pet Sci 18(1):295–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abedi MA, Abbasizadeh S, Karimzadeh R (2021) Adsorptive desulfurization of model diesel fuel over mono-functionalized nickel/γ-alumina and bi-functionalized nickel/cerium/γ-alumina adsorbents. Res Chem Intermed 47(2):497–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Câmara AB et al (2020) Novel application for palygorskite clay mineral: a kinetic and thermodynamic assessment of diesel fuel desulfurization. Adsorption 26(2):267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yosefi L, Khoshbin R, Karimzadeh R (2022) Beneficial incorporation of metal-sulfur interaction in adsorption capacity of boron nitride based adsorbents used in highly selective sulfur removal. Fuel 310:122277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kampouraki Z-C et al (2019) Metal organic frameworks as desulfurization adsorbents of DBT and 4, 6-DMDBT from fuels. Molecules 24(24):4525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jha D et al (2019) Adsorptive removal of dibenzothiophene from diesel fuel using microwave synthesized carbon nanomaterials. Fuel 244:132–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi Y, Zhang X, Liu G (2015) Adsorptive desulfurization performances of ordered mesoporous carbons with tailored textural and surface properties. Fuel 158:565–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Saleh TA, Danmaliki GI (2016) Influence of acidic and basic treatments of activated carbon derived from waste rubber tires on adsorptive desulfurization of thiophenes. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 60:460–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mguni LL et al (2019) Desulphurization of diesel fuels using intermediate Lewis acids loaded on activated charcoal and alumina. Chem Eng Commun 206(5):572–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saleh TA et al (2017) Adsorptive desulfurization of thiophene, benzothiophene and dibenzothiophene over activated carbon manganese oxide nanocomposite: with column system evaluation. J Clean Prod 154:401–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huo Q et al (2019) Cu, Zn-embedded MOF-derived bimetallic porous carbon for adsorption desulfurization. Chem Eng J 378:122106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah SS, Ahmad I, Ahmad W (2016) Adsorptive desulphurization study of liquid fuels using Tin (Sn) impregnated activated charcoal. J Hazard Mater 304:205–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ganiyu SA et al (2016) Influence of aluminium impregnation on activated carbon for enhanced desulfurization of DBT at ambient temperature: role of surface acidity and textural properties. Chem Eng J 303:489–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Azeez MO et al (2022) Synergistic effect of nitrogen and molybdenum on activated carbon matrix for selective adsorptive desulfurization: Insights into surface chemistry modification. Arab J Chem 15(1):103454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yaseen M et al (2021) Fabrication of Zn and Mn loaded activated carbon derived from corn cobs for the adsorptive desulfurization of model and real fuel oils. Fuel 284:119102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Danmaliki GI, Saleh TA (2017) Effects of bimetallic Ce/Fe nanoparticles on the desulfurization of thiophenes using activated carbon. Chem Eng J 307:914–927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Saleh TA (2018) Simultaneous adsorptive desulfurization of diesel fuel over bimetallic nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon. J Clean Prod 172:2123–2132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Saleh TA et al (2018) Ultra-deep adsorptive desulfurization of fuels on cobalt and molybdenum nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon derived from waste rubber. J Colloid Interface Sci 513:779–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shu J et al (2019) Fractional removal of manganese and ammonia nitrogen from electrolytic metal manganese residue leachate using carbonate and struvite precipitation. Water Res 153:229–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen W-S, Liao C-T, Lin K-Y (2017) Recovery zinc and manganese from spent battery powder by hydrometallurgical route. Energy Procedia 107:167–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor A, Frazier A, Gurney E (1963) Solubility products of magnesium ammonium and magnesium potassium phosphates. Trans Faraday Soc 59:1580–1584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mirbagheri SA, Hosseini SN (2005) Pilot plant investigation on petrochemical wastewater treatmentfor the removal of copper and chromium with the objective of reuse. Desalination 171(1):85–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Qin X et al. (2018) Investigation of plating wastewater treatment technology for chromium, nickel and copper. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing

  36. Cairns MJ et al (2006) A study of the uptake of copper ions by nanostructured calcium silicate. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 95(1–3):126–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Q et al (2021) An experimental study of Ni-Mo adsorbent for reactive adsorption desulfurization of spent tire pyrolysis oil modelled using n-hexane and thiophene. Fuel 303:121272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mirhoseini H, Taghdiri M (2016) Extractive oxidation desulfurization of sulfur-containing model fuel using hexamine–phosphotungstate hybrid as effective heterogeneous catalyst. Fuel 167:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Seredych M, Bandosz TJ (2010) Adsorption of dibenzothiophenes on activated carbons with copper and iron deposited on their surfaces. Fuel Process Technol 91(6):693–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen Q, Zhang L, Chen G (2012) Facile preparation of graphene-copper nanoparticle composite by in situ chemical reduction for electrochemical sensing of carbohydrates. Anal Chem 84(1):171–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mironova-Ulmane N et al (2018) Synthesis and vibration spectroscopy of nano-sized manganese oxides. Acta Physica Polonica Series A. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.133.1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Swetha B, Geetha A (2014) Synthesis and characterization of nickel oxide, manganese oxide nanoparticles and NiO/MnO Nano composite: hydrothermal approach. ChemTech Res 7:2138–2143

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bazrafshan A, Hajati S, Ghaedi M (2015) Synthesis of regenerable Zn (OH) 2 nanoparticle-loaded activated carbon for the ultrasound-assisted removal of malachite green: optimization, isotherm and kinetics. RSC Adv 5(96):79119–79128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Obeidat S, Hammoudeh A, Alomary A (2018) Application of FTIR spectroscopy for assessment of green coffee beans according to their origin. J Appl Spectrosc 84(6):1051–1055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu G-Z et al (2016) Comparative study on characterization and adsorption properties of activated carbons by phosphoric acid activation from corncob and its acid and alkaline hydrolysis residues. Fuel Process Technol 144:255–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hudgins DM, Allamandola L (1997) Infrared spectroscopy of matrix-isolated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon cations. 4 The tetracyclic PAH isomers chrysene and 1, 2-benzanthracene. J Phys Chem A 101(19):3472–3477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dashamiri S et al (2016) Ultrasonic enhancement of the simultaneous removal of quaternary toxic organic dyes by CuO nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon: central composite design, kinetic and isotherm study. Ultrason Sonochem 31:546–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Elango M et al (2018) Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of polyindole/Ag–Cuo nanocomposites by reflux condensation method. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 57(14):1440–1451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Nieto-Delgado C, Terrones M, Rangel-Mendez J (2011) Development of highly microporous activated carbon from the alcoholic beverage industry organic by-products. Biomass Bioenerg 35(1):103–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bardestani R, Patience GS, Kaliaguine S (2019) Experimental methods in chemical engineering: specific surface area and pore size distribution measurements—BET, BJH, and DFT. Can J Chem Eng 97(11):2781–2791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sing K, Rouqerol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Pure Appl Chem 57:603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kaneko K (1994) Determination of pore size and pore size distribution: 1. Adsorbents and catalysts. J Membr Sci 96(1–2):59–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bae Y-S, Yazaydın AO, Snurr RQ (2010) Evaluation of the BET method for determining surface areas of MOFs and zeolites that contain ultra-micropores. Langmuir 26(8):5475–5483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kim KC, Yoon T-U, Bae Y-S (2016) Applicability of using CO2 adsorption isotherms to determine BET surface areas of microporous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 224:294–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wan Mokhtar WNA et al (2015) Catalytic oxidative desulfurization of diesel oil by Co/Mn/Al2O3 catalysts—tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) system: preparation, characterization, reaction, and mechanism. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17(6):1487–1497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ayers PW (2007) The physical basis of the hard/soft acid/base principle. Faraday Discuss 135:161–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ayers PW (2005) An elementary derivation of the hard/soft-acid/base principle. J Chem Phys 122(14):141102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Menzel R et al (2016) Graphene oxide/mixed metal oxide hybrid materials for enhanced adsorption desulfurization of liquid hydrocarbon fuels. Fuel 181:531–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Samarghandi MR, Hadi M, McKay G (2014) Breakthrough curve analysis for fixed-bed adsorption of Azo dyes using novel pine cone—derived active carbon. Adsorpt Sci Technol 32(10):791–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zou W, Bai H, Gao S (2012) Competitive adsorption of neutral Red and Cu2+ onto pyrolytic char: isotherm and kinetic study. J Chem Eng Data 57(10):2792–2801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Langmuir I (1916) The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Part I. Solids. J Am Chem Soc 38(11):2221–2295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Weber TW, Chakravorti RK (1974) Pore and solid diffusion models for fixed-bed adsorbers. AIChE J 20(2):228–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Freundlich H (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys chem 57(385471):1100–1107

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tran HN et al (2017) Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: a critical review. Water Res 120:88–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Jafarinasab M et al (2020) An efficient Co-based metal–organic framework nanocrystal (Co-ZIF-67) for adsorptive desulfurization of dibenzothiophene: Impact of the preparation approach on structure tuning. Energy Fuels 34(10):12779–12791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lagergren S (1898) About the theory of so-called adsorption of solution substances. pp. 147–156

  67. Blanchard G, Maunaye M, Martin G (1984) Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Res 18(12):1501–1507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Chemistry, at the University of Sulaimani for the opportunity to conduct this research.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousif Mustafa Salih.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there are no conflicts with this manuscript. They have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 667 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Othman, C.S., Salih, Y.M., Hamasalih, L.O. et al. Influence of different nanocomposite carbon-based adsorbers on the adsorption desulfurization of dibenzothiophene in model oil and diesel fuel: a comparative study. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 136, 919–936 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-023-02378-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-023-02378-z

Keywords

Navigation