Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of different alumina phases on the catalytic properties of palladium-alumina catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective hydrogenation of acetylene was studied using palladium catalysts supported on different transition alumina spheres. The alumina supports were prepared by calcining pseudo boehmite alumina sphere at different calcination temperatures; the ρ-Al2O3 used was flash calcined alumina. The alumina supports were characterized using different techniques like XRD, surface area, pore volume and acidity. The Pd/Al2O3 catalyst were prepared, palladium penetration depth was measured using microscopic imaging and the catalyst reducibility were studied by Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR). The microscopic imaging using TEM were done to study the palladium particle size and nature of particle clusters on the support surface. The catalyst performance evaluation was done in a fixed bed reactor with 1% acetylene in nitrogen feed and studied the impact of support properties on the catalytic activity. The catalyst prepared on γ-Al2O3 support showed the highest conversion and lowest selectivity, whereas the catalyst on α-Al2O3 support has the lower conversion and highest selectivity. Thermogravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectroscopy analysis were done for the spent catalyst to understand the possibilities of heavy component deposition of the catalyst. The catalyst prepared on α-Al2O3 support had the lowest hydrocarbon deposit on the surface whereas the γ and δ alumina showed the highest hydrocarbon deposits on the catalyst surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tiedtke DB, Bergmeister JJ, Cheung TP, Rhoades RA (2001) Progress in the development of E-Series catalyst technologies for the selective hydrogenation of acetylene in various hydrocarbon streams. Thai Olefins Ethylene Technology Forum

  2. McCue AJ, Anderson JA (2015) Recent advances in selective acetylene hydrogenation using palladium containing catalysts. Front Chem Sci Eng 9:142–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-015-1516-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Takht Ravanchi M, Fadaeerayeni S, Rahimi Fard M (2014) An egg-shell Pd-Ag/α-Al2O3 catalyst for tail-end acetylene selective hydrogenation. IJChE 11(1):42–54

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sivaraj CH, Contescue CR, Schwarz JA (1991) Effect of calcination temperature of alumina on the adsorption/impregnation of Pd(II) compounds. J Catal 132(2):422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(91)90159-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill MR, Bastow TJ, Celotto S, Hill AJ (2007) Integrated study of the calcination cycle from gibbsite to corundum. Chem Mater 19(11):2877–2883. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm070078f

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boumaza A, Favaro L, Lédion J et al (2009) Transition alumina phases induced by heat treatment of boehmite: An X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy study. J Solid State Chem 182(5):1171–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2009.02.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takht Ravanchi M, Rahimi Fard M, Fadaeerayeeni S, Yaripour F (2015) Effect of calcination conditions on crystalline structure and pore size distribution for a mesoporous alumina. Chem Eng Commun 202(4):493–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2013.850577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang PL, Yen FS, Cheng KC, Wen HL (2001) Examinations on critical and primary crystallite sizes during θ- to α-phase transformations of ultrafine alumina powders. Nano Lett 1(5):253–261. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl015501c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iaponeide M, Macedo F, Aparecido Bertran C, Osawa CC (2007) Kinetic of the γ-to α-alumina transformation by quantitative X-ray diffraction. J Mater Sci 42:2830–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1364-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perander LM, Zujovic ZD, Groutso T, Hyland MM, Smith ME, O’Dell LA, Metson JB (2007) Characterization of metallurgical-grade aluminas and their precursors by 27Al NMR and XRD. Can J Chem 85(10):889–897. https://doi.org/10.1139/v07-106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Application note 134 https://www.micromeritics.com/Repository/Files/apnote134.pdf.

  12. Gopinath R, Babu NS, Kumar JV, Lingaiah N, Prasad PS (2008) Influence of Pd precursor and method of preparation on hydrodechlorination activity of alumina supported palladium catalysts. Catal Lett 120:312–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-007-9287-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu Q, Gao J, Chen J, Wen L (2010) Selective hydrogenation of acetylene over egg-shell palladium nanocatalyst. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 10(9):5641–5647. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.2472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Storozhenko PA, Aleshin AI, Douganyuk VF (2010) Selecting heat treatment conditions of alumina supports to improve the quality of selective hydrogenation palladium catalysts. Catal Ind 2:282–286. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207005041003013X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan NA, Shaikhutdinov S, Freund HJ (2006) Acetylene and ethylene hydrogenation on alumina supported Pd-Ag model catalysts. Catal Lett 108:159–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-006-0041-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ludwig W, Savara AA, Dostert K-H, Schauermann S (2011) Olefin hydrogenation on Pd model supported catalysts: new mechanistic insights. J Catal 284(2):148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.10.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Paryjczak T, Rynkowski J (1984) Temperature-programmed reduction and temperature-programmed oxidation of nickel and copper-nickel catalysts with addition of palladium supported on alumina. React Kinet Mech Cat 24:187–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Application note 120 “Temperature-Programmed Reduction Using the AutoChem” https://www.micromeritics.com/Repository/Files/appnote120.pdf

  19. Sorbier L, Gay A-S, Fécant A, Moreaud M, Brodusch N (2013) Measurement of palladium crust thickness on catalysts by optical microscopy and image analysis. Microsc Microanal 19(2):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927612014316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dehghani O, Rahimpour MR, Shariati A (2019) An experimental approach on industrial Pd-Ag supported α-Al2O3 catalyst used in acetylene hydrogenation process: mechanism, kinetic and catalyst decay. MDPI Process 27(3):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7030136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Takht Ravanchi M, Fadaeerayeni S, Rahimi Fard M (2017) Acetylene selective hydrogenation: a technical review on catalytic aspects. Rev Chem Eng 34(2):215–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/REVCE-2016-0036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Komhom S, Mekasuwandumrong O, Praserthdam P, Panpranot J (2008) Improvement of Pd/Al2O3 catalyst performance in selective acetylene hydrogenation using mixed phases Al2O3 support. Catal Commun 10(1):86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2008.07.039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Taromi AA, Kaliaguine S (2017) Synthesis of ordered mesoporous γ-alumina: effects of calcination conditions and polymeric template concentration. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 248:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.04.040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Macêdo MIF, Bertran CA, Osawa CC (2007) Kinetics of the γ → α-alumina phase transformation by quantitative X-ray diffraction. J Mater Sci 42:2830–2836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1364-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravanchi MT, Fadaeerayeni S, Fard MR (2016) The effect of calcination temperature on physicochemical properties of alumina as a support for acetylene selective hydrogenation catalyst. Res Chem Intermed 4(2):4797–4811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-015-2320-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sung DM, Kim YH, Park ED, Yie JE (2010) Correlation between acidity and catalytic activity for the methanol dehydration over various aluminum oxides. Res Chem Intermed 36:653–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-010-0201-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Standard Practice for Calculation of Pore Size Distributions of Catalysts and Catalyst Carriers from Nitrogen Desorption Isotherms, ASTM D4641-1. https://www.quantachrome.com/standards.html

  28. Vaidya SD, Thakkar NV (2001) Effect of temperature, pH and ageing time on hydration of rho alumina by studying phase composition and surface properties of transition alumina obtained after thermal dehydration. Mater Lett 51(4):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00307-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bhogeswararao S, Srinivas D (2015) Catalytic conversion of furfural to industrial chemicals over supported Pt and Pd catalysts. J Catal 327:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2015.04.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wongwaranom N, Mekasuwandumrong O, Praserthdam P, Panpranot P (2008) Performance of Pd catalysts supported on nanocrystalline α-Al2O3 and Ni-modified α-Al2O3 in selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Catal Today 131(1–4):553–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.10.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Duca D, Varga Z, La Manna G, Vidoczy T (2000) Hydrogenation of acetylene-ethylene mixtures on Pd catalysts: study of the surface mechanism by computational approaches, metal dispersion and activity of the catalyst. Theor Chem Acc 104:302–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002140000123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Komeilia S, Ravanchib MT, Taeb A (2015) The influence of alumina phases on the performance of the Pd–Ag/Al2O3catalyst in tail-end selective hydrogenation of acetylene. Appl Catal A 502:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.06.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bos ANR, Westerterp KR (1993) Mechanism and kinetics of the selective hydrogenation of ethyne and ethane. Chem Eng Process 32(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0255-2701(93)87001-B

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gislason J, Xia W, Sellers H (2002) Selective hydrogenation of acetylene in an ethylene rich flow: results of kinetic simulation. J Phys Chem 106(5):767–774. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp011238s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Battiston GC, Dalloro L, Tauszik GR (1982) Performance and aging of catalysts for the selective hydrogenation of acetylene: a micropilot-plant study. Appl Catal 2(1–2):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-9834(82)80170-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ball MR, Rivera-Dones KR, Gilcher EB, Ausman SF, Hullfish CW, Lebrón EA, Dumesic JA (2020) AgPd and CuPd catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. ACS Catal 10(15):8567–8581. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c01536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. HeupMoon S-J (2011) Performance of Cu-promoted Pd catalysts prepared by adding Cu using a surface redox method in acetylene hydrogenation. Appl Catal A 401(1–2):12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.04.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zou S et al (2021) Grafting nanometer metal/oxide interface towards enhanced low-temperature acetylene semi-hydrogenation. Nat Commun 12:5570. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25984-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Feng J-T, Ma X-Y, Evans DG, Li D-Q (2011) Enhancement of metal dispersion and selective acetylene hydrogenation catalytic properties of a supported Pd catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(4):1947–1954. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101508z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ibhadon AO, Kansal SK (2018) The reduction of alkynes over Pd-based catalyst materials: a pathway to chemical synthesis. J Chem Eng Process Technol. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7048.1000376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pradier CM, Mazina M, Berthier Y, Oudar J (1994) Hydrogenation of acetylene on palladium. J Mol Catal 89(1–2):20211–20220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-5102(93)E0323-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ravanchi MT, Sahebdelfar S, Komeili S (2018) Acetylene selective hydrogenation: a technical review on catalytic aspects. Rev Chem Eng 34(2):215–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2016-0036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ravanchi MT, Sahebdelfar S, Fard MR, Fadaeerayeni S, Bigdeli P (2016) Pd-Ag/α-Al2O3 catalyst deactivation in acetylene selective hydrogenation. Chem Eng Process 39(2):301–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201400526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Z, Du W, Qian F, Tian L, Jiang D (2015) Improve acetylene hydrogenation selectivity using dynamic deactivation estimation. Hydrocarbon processing. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kuhn M, Lucas M, Claus P (2015) Precise recognition of catalyst deactivation during acetylene hydrogenation studied with the advanced TEMKIN reactor. Catal Commun 72(5):170–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2015.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Samavatia M, Ebrahima HA, Dorjb Y (2018) Effect of the operating parameters on the simulation of acetylene hydrogenation reactor with catalyst deactivation. Appl Catal A 567:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.06.038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author (KR) acknowledges the support received from the Management and R&D colleagues of Sud-Chemie India (P) Ltd for all the support received in completing this study. The author acknowledges DST-SAIF Cochin for the microscopic data analysis.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KR—main contributor for literature search, design, execution of the experiments and data interpretations involved in this study. GM—supervisor and research guide. VRR—contributed to the design and safety aspects of the test unit and the process. SR—contributed for the review of thermogravimetric studies and spent catalyst analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kishore Ravindran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Consent to participate

All authors participated in the creation of this manuscript.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publish this manuscript in the journal.

Availability of data and materials

The authors confirm that the data and the findings mentioned in this study are available within the article and raw data and the derived data supporting the findings are available from the corresponding author on request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 218 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravindran, K., Madhu, G., Renjith, V.R. et al. Influence of different alumina phases on the catalytic properties of palladium-alumina catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 134, 867–882 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-021-02112-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-021-02112-7

Keywords

Navigation