Correction to: Review of Accounting Studies (2019) 24:393–425
The original version of this article unfortunately contained mistakes.
In Table 4 (page 411), we inadvertently presented incorrect standard errors on six variables. The coefficients and the significance levels indicated on the table are all correct.
The corrected statistics are as follows:
- 1.
The standard error on ABS DISC ACCRUALS should be 0.161.
- 2.
The standard error on ICMW should be 0.050.
- 3.
The standard error on LEV should be 0.084.
- 4.
The standard error on LOSS should be 0.036.
- 5.
The standard error on FILING SUPPLY should be 0.002.
- 6.
The standard error on AUDITOR TENURE should be 0.008.
These are our mistakes and do not influence the statistics inferences or conclusions of the article. We sincerely apologize for the errors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09490-3
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drake, M.S., Lamoreaux, P.T., Quinn, P.J. et al. Correction to: Auditor benchmarking of client disclosures. Rev Account Stud 24, 1523 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09515-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09515-x