Advertisement

Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 570–592 | Cite as

Tilting the evidence: the role of firm-level earnings attributes in the relation between aggregated earnings and gross domestic product

  • Ryan T. BallEmail author
  • Lindsey Gallo
  • Eric Ghysels
Article

Abstract

We examine whether the contribution of firm-level accounting earnings to the informativeness of the aggregate is tilted towards earnings with specific financial reporting characteristics. Specifically, we investigate whether considering the smoothness of firm-level earnings increases the informativeness of aggregate earnings for future real GDP, and if so, whether macroeconomic forecasters use this information efficiently. Using recently-developed mixed data sampling methods, we find that the aggregate is tilted towards firms with smoother earnings and that this composition of aggregate earnings outperforms traditional weighting schemes. Further, this tilted aggregate has a stronger positive association with forecast revisions; in fact, analysts who utilize earnings the most in their forecasts appear to fully impound the informativeness of earnings smoothness. Our results synthesize and span parallel yet distinct streams of research on the role of accounting earnings in firm-level and macroeconomic outcomes and suggest an important role for financial reporting characteristics in the aggregate.

Keywords

Gross domestic product Aggregated earnings Tilt Mixed data sampling 

JEL Classification

E00 E01 M41 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate helpful comments from Robert Bushman, Peter Easton (editor), Dennis Fixler, Rebecca Hann, Greg Miller, Zack Miller, Scott Richardson, Gil Sadka, Lakshmanan Shivakumar, an anonymous reviewer, and participants at the 2018 CARE conference on Firm-Level Information and the Macroeconomy and the Southern Economics Association’s Annual Meeting as well as seminars at the University of Iowa, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Washington, and the University of Michigan’s Paton Center brown bag series.

References

  1. Anderson, E., Ghysels, E., Juergens, J. (2009). The impact of risk and uncertainty on expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, R., & Sadka, G. (2015). Aggregate earnings and why they matter. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, R.T., Bonham, J., Hemmer, T. (2018). Does it pay to “Be Like Mike”? Aspirational peer firms and relative performance evaluation. Working paper, University of Michigan, University of Chicago, and Rice University.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, R.T., & Gallo, L. (2018). A mixed data sampling approach to accounting research, Working paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, R.T., & Ghysels, E. (2018). Automated earnings forecasts: beat analysts or combine and conquer? Management Science, 64(10), 4936–4952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonsall, S., Bozanic, Z., Fischer, P. (2013). What do management earnings forecasts convey about the macroeconomy? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(2), 225–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt, M., Santa-Clara, P., Valkanov, R. (2009). Parametric portfolio policies: exploiting characteristics in the cross-section of equity returns. Review of Financial Studies, 22(9), 3411–3447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crawley, M. (2014). Macroeconomic consequences of accounting: the effect of accounting conservatism on macroeconomic indicators and the money supply. The Accounting Review, 90(3), 987–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dechow, P. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flows as measure of firm performance: the role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dechow, P., Ge, W., Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: a review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 344–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeFond, M., & Park, C. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(2), 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demerjian, P., Lewis-Western, M., McVay, S. (2017). How does intentional earnings smoothing vary with managerial ability? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17748405.
  13. Dichev, I. (2018). Comparing GAAP to NIPA earnings. Working paper, Emory University.Google Scholar
  14. Gallo, L., Hann, R., Li, C. (2016). Aggregate earnings surprises, monetary policy, and stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(1), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghysels, E., Santa-Clara, P., Valkanov, R. (2006). Predicting volatility: getting the most out of return data sampled at different frequencies. Journal of Econometrics, 131(1–2), 59–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Konchitchki, Y., & Patatoukas, P. (2014a). Accounting earnings and gross domestic product. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(1), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Konchitchki, Y., & Patatoukas, P. (2014b). Taking the pulse of the real economy using financial statement analysis: implications for macro forecasting and stock valuation. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 669–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kothari, S.P. (2001). Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 105–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kothari, S.P., Lewellen, J., Warner, J. (2006). Stock returns, aggregate earnings surprises, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(3), 537–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kothari, S.P., Lewellen, J., Warner, J. (2014). The behavior of aggregate corporate investment. Working paper, MIT, Dartmouth College, and University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  21. Laurion, H., & Patatoukas, P. (2016). From micro to macro: does conditional conservatism aggregate up in the national income and product accounts? Journal of Financial Reporting, 1(2), 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., Wysocki, P. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69 (3), 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nallareddy, S., & Ogneva, M. (2016). Predicting restatements in macroeconomic indicators using accounting information. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 151–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shivakumar, L., & Urcan, O. (2017). Why does aggregate earnings growth reflect information about future inflation? The Accounting Review, 92(6), 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Subramanyam, K. (1996). The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1–3), 249–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tucker, J., & Zarowin, P. (2006). Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness? The Accounting Review, 81(1), 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stephen M. Ross School of BusinessUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations