Skip to main content
Log in

Equity cross-listings in the U.S. and the price of debt

  • Published:
Review of Accounting Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a large panel from 46 countries over 20 years, we find that non-U.S. firms issue corporate bonds more frequently and at lower offering yields following an equity cross-listing on a U.S. exchange. Firms issue more bonds through public offerings instead of private placements and in foreign markets rather than at home, in both cases at significantly lower yields. Moreover, the debt-related benefits are concentrated among firms domiciled in countries with less private benefits of control, efficient debt enforcement, and developed bond markets, suggesting that equity cross-listings cannot completely offset the impact of weak home country institutions. The results support the notion that the monitoring, transparency, and visibility benefits brought about by equity cross-listings on U.S. exchanges are valuable to bond investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Prior evidence suggests that firms cross-listing shares on a U.S. exchange raise equity capital more frequently (e.g., Reese and Weisbach 2002), obtain higher equity valuations (e.g., Foerster and Karolyi 1999; Doidge et al. 2004), reduce the cost of equity capital (e.g., Errunza and Miller 2000; Hail and Leuz 2009), improve liquidity (e.g., Baruch et al. 2007) and the information environment (e.g., Lang et al. 2003), and expand their investor base (e.g., Ammer et al. 2012; King and Segal 2009).

  2. We refer to a foreign firm’s U.S. cross-listed equity as “ADR,” regardless of whether it is an exchange-listed American Depositary Receipt (Level II or III), a direct listing (e.g., for Canadian firms), a globally or New York registered share, a share traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) markets (the OTC Bulletin Board and Pink Sheets), or a private placement under Rule 144A.

  3. Empirical work in the equity market provides support for both theories (e.g., Doidge et al. 2004; King and Segal 2009).

  4. In both cases, access to external (equity or debt) capital is a primary motivation for cross-listing. In line with this argument, Pagano et al. (2002) show that U.S. exchanges are attractive for (European) high-tech and export-oriented companies that use the equity cross-listing to fund their growth and foreign sales expansion.

  5. It is important to note that liquidity improvements in the bond market are closely related to changes in the quality of the information environment. Hence, it is difficult, if not impossible, to disentangle the liquidity hypothesis from the bonding and information hypothesis.

  6. Miller and Puthenpurackal (2002) and Miller and Reisel (2012) show that investors in Yankee bonds (i.e., bonds issued in the U.S. by foreign firms) require higher yield spreads and impose more restrictive debt covenants if the issuing firm is from a country with weak creditor rights protection.

  7. Leverage often increases after takeovers (Kim and McConnell 1977; Ghosh and Jain 2000). Higher leverage reduces the value of existing debt by increasing the probability and deadweight costs of a possible future bankruptcy and by reordering the priority of claims in the case of default (e.g., issuance of more senior debt).

  8. Consistent with bank lenders being better able to mitigate agency issues than public debt holders, Harvey et al. (2004) find that equity returns around the issuance of syndicated loans (but not public bonds) are positively associated with management’s separation of ownership and control and with the extent of assets in place that can be exploited by the management.

  9. We include Canadian firms in this group because they can directly list their shares on U.S. exchanges without using depository receipts and, at the same time, are exempted from certain U.S. reporting requirements under the Multi-Jurisdictional Disclosure System.

  10. In a related study, Boubakri et al. (2013) examine factors that influence the propensity of issuing debt (and equity) in the first year after a U.S. equity cross-listing. They exclusively focus on a sample of ADR firms and, hence, the insights are limited to the incremental changes in the propensity of issuing debt given the firm is already cross-listed. In contrast, we utilize a panel that includes all observations pre and post cross-listing as well as non-cross-listed firms. This design lets us speak directly to the incremental effects of cross-listing on the propensity of issuing debt (relative to the pre-period and the non-cross-listed firms).

  11. If ticker information or data like the International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) is not available, we base the matching on the issuing firm’s name, country of domicile, and 4-digit SIC code. This procedure does not allow us to identify debt and equity offerings by subsidiaries if they are incorporated under a different name, domiciled in a different country, or belong to a different industry than their parent company.

  12. The bias towards Japanese firms is already present in Thompson Deals and Mergent FISD, consistent with prior evidence suggesting that Japanese firms moved away from bank debt towards public debt financing in the 1990s (Hoshi et al. 1993).

  13. If credit ratings are missing (i.e., for about 75% of the sample), we compute Altman’s (1968) Z-score as (1.2*working capital + 1.4*retained earnings + 3.3*EBIT + 0.999*sales)/total assets + (0.6*market value of equity/book value of total liabilities), and use 2.675 as cutoff value to assign investment grade status. The two measures are significantly and positively correlated for the subsample with both available.

  14. Consistent with this argument, Andrade et al. (2014) find that SOX is associated with a significant decrease in the cost of debt, mainly due to an increase in corporate transparency.

  15. This yearly benefit could be enhanced by additional cost savings associated with future debt issuances at lower offering yields. At the same time, we acknowledge that debt offerings after U.S. equity cross-listings are not costless, but might involve additional compliance, administrative, and reputational costs. We do not provide evidence on these costs and, hence, cannot say whether the debt transactions are net beneficial.

  16. For the Loan Spread analysis, we pare down the propensity sample to syndicated loans with data available in Dealscan, require a minimum loan amount of US$ 10 million, and only retain the loan with the largest facility amount per year. The resulting sample comprises 5200 loan issues from 46 countries.

  17. The lack of data in Dealscan does not allow us to pursue these alternative channels empirically.

References

  • Altman, E. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammer, J., Holland, S., Smith, D., & Warnock, F. (2012). U.S. international equity investment. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 1109–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, S., Bernile, G., & Hood, F. (2014). SOX, corporate transparency, and the cost of debt. Journal of Banking and Finance, 38, 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, S., Karolyi, G. A., & Lemmon, M. (2007). Multi-market trading and liquidity: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 62, 2169–2200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, A., Weber, J., & Yu, J. (2008). Conservatism and debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharath, S., Sunder, J., & Sunder, S. (2008). Accounting quality and debt contracting. The Accounting Review, 83, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., & Samet, A. (2013). International cross-listings and subsequent security-market choices: Evidence from ADRs. Financial Review, 48, 311–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillo, M., & Wright, J. (2000). How do firms choose their lenders? An empirical investigation. Review of Financial Studies, 13, 155–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., Lesmond, D., & Wei, J. (2007). Corporate yield spreads and bond liquidity. Journal of Finance, 62, 119–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J., & Srinivasan, S. (2014). SOX after ten years. Accounting Horizons, 28, 627–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J. (1999). The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate governance and its implications. Northwestern University Law Review, 93, 641–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee, J. (2002). Racing towards the top? The impact of cross-listings and stock market competition on international corporate governance. Columbia Law Review, 102, 1757–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. (1991). Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 689–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 430–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. (2004). Why are foreign firms listed in the U.S. worth more? Journal of Financial Economics, 71, 205–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. (2009). Has New York become less competitive than London in global markets? Evaluating foreign listing choices over time. Journal of Financial Economics, 91, 253–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., & Stulz, R. (2010). Why do foreign firms leave U.S. equity markets? Journal of Finance, 65, 1507–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2004). Private benefits of control: An international comparison. Journal of Finance, 59, 537–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errunza, V., & Miller, D. (2000). Market segmentation and the cost of capital in international equity markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35, 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1985). What’s different about banks? Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., Titman, S., & Twite, G. (2012). An international comparison of capital structure and debt maturity choices. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47, 23–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florou, A., & Kosi, U. (2015). Does mandatory IFRS adoption facilitate debt financing? Review of Accounting Studies, 20, 1407–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, S., & Karolyi, G. A. (1999). The effects of market segmentation and investor recognition on asset prices: Evidence from foreign stocks listing in the U.S. Journal of Finance, 54, 981–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J., Khurana, I., & Pereira, R. (2005). Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of capital around the world. The Accounting Review, 80, 1125–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A., & Jain, P. (2000). Financial leverage changes associated with corporate mergers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigler, F., Kanodia, C., Sapra, H., & Venugopalan, R. (2009). Accounting conservatism and the efficiency of debt contracts. Journal of Accounting Research, 47, 767–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2009). Cost of capital effects and changes in growth expectations around U.S. cross-listings. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 428–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C., Lins, K., & Roper, A. (2004). The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme. Journal of Financial Economics, 74, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, B., Jegadeesh, N., & Weisbach, M. (2006). World markets for raising new capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 63–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., & Scharfstein, D. (1993). The choice between public and private debt: An analysis of post-deregulation corporate financing in Japan. NBER: Working paper.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J., & James, C. (1996). Bank information monopolies and the mix of private and public debt claims. Journal of Finance, 51, 1863–1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivashina, V., & Sun, Z. (2011). Institutional stock trading on loan market information. Journal of Financial Economics, 100, 284–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karolyi, G. A. (1998). Why do companies list shares abroad? A survey of the evidence and its managerial implications. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 7, 1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karolyi, G. A. (2006). The world of cross-listings and cross-listings of the world: Challenging conventional wisdom. Review of Finance, 10, 99–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, I., Martin, X., & Pereira, R. (2008). Firm growth and cross listing. Review of Finance, 12, 293–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & McConnell, J. (1977). Corporate mergers and co-insurance of corporate debt. Journal of Finance, 32, 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Segal, D. (2009). The long-term effects of cross-listing, investor recognition, and ownership structure on valuation. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 2393–2421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, S., & Carleton, W. (2010). Financial contracting and the choice between private placement and publicly offered bonds. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42, 907–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M., Lins, K., & Miller, D. (2003). ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the United States improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leftwich, R. (1983). Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. The Accounting Review, 58, 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H., & Pyle, D. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32, 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht, A. (2003). Cross-listing and corporate governance: Bonding or avoiding? Chicago Journal of International Law, 4, 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lins, K., Strickland, D., & Zenner, M. (2005). Do non-U.S. firms issue equity on U.S. stock exchanges to relax capital constraints? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42, 483–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Puthenpurackal, J. (2002). The costs, wealth effects, and determinants of international capital raising: Evidence from public Yankee bonds. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 11, 455–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Reisel, N. (2012). Do country-level investor protections affect security-level contract design? Evidence from foreign bond covenants. Review of Financial Studies, 25, 408–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M., Röell, A., & Zechner, J. (2002). The geography of equity listing: Why do companies list abroad? Journal of Finance, 57, 2651–2694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y., Roth, L., & Wald, J. (2010). Political rights and the cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics, 95, 202–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, Y., Roth, L., & Wald, J. (2011). How legal environments affect the use of bond covenants. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 235–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, J., & Strahan, P. (2007). How laws and institutions shape financial contracts: The case of bank loans. Journal of Finance, 62, 2803–2834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. Journal of Finance, 50, 1421–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, W., & Weisbach, M. (2002). Protection of minority shareholder interests, cross-listings in the United States, and subsequent equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 65–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. (2005). Can foreign firms bond themselves effectively by renting U.S. securities laws? Journal of Financial Economics, 75, 319–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. (1981). A model of international asset pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. (1999). Globalization, corporate finance, and the cost of capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12, 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank an anonymous referee, Anne Beatty, Phil Berger, Maria Correia, Günther Gebhardt, Wayne Guay, Bob Holthausen, Scott Liao, Russ Lundholm (editor), Oguzhan Ozbas, Doug Skinner, René Stulz, and workshop participants at the 2009 Global Issues in Accounting Conference, 2009 INTACCT international workshop in Porto, 2009 Verein für Socialpolitik Accounting Section meeting, 2009 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, 2010 European Financial Management Association meeting, 2011 European Accounting Association meeting, University of Chicago, Erasmus University, Goethe University, INSEAD, New York University, Ohio State University, University of Pennsylvania, University of Rochester, Stanford University, and University of Texas at Austin for helpful comments. Ryan Ball gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Ernst & Young Faculty Fellowship. Florin Vasvari gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the London Business School RAMD Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan T. Ball.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ball, R.T., Hail, L. & Vasvari, F.P. Equity cross-listings in the U.S. and the price of debt. Rev Account Stud 23, 385–421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9424-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9424-0

JEL classifications

Keywords

Navigation