Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 283–318 | Cite as

Managerial performance evaluation for capacity investments

  • Alexander Nezlobin
  • Stefan Reichelstein
  • Yanruo Wang


This paper examines the design of managerial performance measures based on accounting information. The owners of the firm seek to create goal congruence for a better informed manager who is to decide on capacity investments and subsequent production levels. Managerial incentives are shaped by the performance metric and the depreciation schedule for capacity assets. Earlier literature has made the distinction between capacity assets whose degradation is primarily usage-driven as opposed to time-driven. Our analysis also distinguishes between two plausible scenarios in which an inherent lumpiness in the efficient scale of investments necessitates one upfront investment as opposed to a sequence of incremental capacity additions over time. For each of the four resulting scenarios, we obtain a complete characterization of the entire class of goal congruent performance metrics and depreciation schedules. The final part of our analysis also explores goal congruence in settings where the decline of asset productivity is a function of both time and usage.


Performance measurement Managerial incentives Accrual accounting 

JEL Classification

M40 M41 D82 



We are grateful to Tim Baldenius, Madhav Rajan, and seminar participants at the NYU/Yale joint seminar for comments on an earlier version of this paper. We are also grateful to Paul Fischer (the editor) and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive suggestions.


  1. Arrow, K. (1964). Optimal capital policy, the cost of capital and myopic decision rules. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 16(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan, R., & Sivaramakrishnan, S. (2002). A critical overview of full-cost data for planning and pricing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 14, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldenius, T., Nezlobin, A., & Vaysman, I. (2014). Managerial performance evaluation under uncertain demand. Working paper, New York University.Google Scholar
  4. Baldenius, T., & Reichelstein, S. (2005). Incentives for efficient inventory management: The role of historical cost. Management Science, 51(7), 1032–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldenius, T., & Ziv, A. (2003). Performance evaluation and corporate income taxes in a sequential delegation setting. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 283–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldenius, T., Dutta, S., & Reichelstein, S. (2007). Cost allocation for capital budgeting decisions. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 837–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bareket, M., & Mohnen, A. (2007). Performance measurement for investment decisions under capital constraints. Review of Accounting Studies, 10, 527–552.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, M. (2008). The drivers of the levelized cost of electricity for utility-scale photovoltaics. White paper. Sunpower Corporation.
  9. Carlton, S., & Perloff, J. (2005). Advanced industrial organization (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson/Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, P., Feltham, G., & Wu, M. (2002). Cost of capital in residual income measurement under moral hazard. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixit, S., & Pindyck, R. (2002). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dutta, S., & Reichelstein, S. (2002). Controlling investment decisions: Depreciation and capital charges. Review of Accounting Studies, 7, 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutta, S., & Reichelstein, S. (2005). Accrual accounting for performance evaluation. Review of Accounting Studies, 10, 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutta, S., & Reichelstein, S. (2010). Decentralized capacity management and internal pricing. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(3), 442–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrbar, A. (1998). EVA: The real key to creating wealth. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Ehrbar, A., & Stewart, B. (1999). The EVA revolution. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12(2), 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedl, M. G. (2005). Incentive properties of residual income when there is an option to wait. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57, 3–21.Google Scholar
  18. Hotelling, H. (1931). The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy, 39, 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, N. (2010). Deferred taxes in residual income compensation schemes. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, N., Pfeiffer, T., & Schneider, G. (2013). Multistage capital budgeting decisions for shared investments. Management Science, 59(5), 1213–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan, R. (2006). Activity-based costing and capacity. Harvard Business School Case # 9–105-059.Google Scholar
  22. NETL. (2007). Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants-Volume 1: Bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity final report.
  23. Nezlobin, A. (2012). Accrual accounting, informational sufficiency, and equity valuation. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(1), 233–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pittman, B. (2009). Whom are you calling irrational? Marginal costs, variable costs, and the pricing practices of firms. Working paper, Department of Justice, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  25. Poterba, J., & Summers, L. (1992). Time horizons of American firms: New evidence from a survey of CEOs. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pfeiffer, T., & Schneider, G. (2007). Residual income based compensation schemes for controlling investment decisions under sequential private information. Management Science, 53(3), 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plambeck, E., & Taylor, T. (2007). Implications of breach remedy and renegotiation design for innovation and capacity. Management Science, 53(12), 1859–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajan, M., & Reichelstein, S. (2009). Depreciation rules and the relation between marginal and historical cost. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(3), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reichelstein, S. (1997). Investment decisions and managerial performance evaluation. Review of Accounting Studies, 2, 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reichelstein, S. (2000). Providing managerial incentives: Cash flows versus accrual accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 38(2), 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogerson, W. (1997). Inter-temporal cost allocation and managerial investment incentives: A theory explaining the use of Economic Value Added as a performance measure. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 770–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogerson, W. (2008). Inter-temporal cost allocation and investment decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 931–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogerson, W. (2011). On the relationship between historic cost, forward looking cost and long run marginal cost. Review of Network Economics, 10(2), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solomons, D. (1965). Divisional performance measurement and control. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  35. Stewart, B. (1991). The quest for value. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Van Mieghem, J. (2003). Capacity management, investment and hedging: Review and recent developments. Manufacturing and Service Operation Management, 5(4), 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wei, D. (2004). Interdepartmental cost allocation and investment incentives. Review of Accounting Studies, 9, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Young, D., & O’Byrne, S. (2000). EVA and value-based management: A practical guide. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Nezlobin
    • 1
  • Stefan Reichelstein
    • 2
  • Yanruo Wang
    • 3
  1. 1.Haas School of BusinessUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of BusinessStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Incapture InvestmentsSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations