Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 736–768 | Cite as

Measuring discretionary accruals: are ROA-matched models better than the original Jones-type models?



Discretionary accruals estimated from Jones-type models are elevated or depressed for firms with extreme performance. Kothari et al. (J Acc Econ 39:163–197, 2005) propose performance matching to address the issue, that is, to difference discretionary accruals estimated from Jones-type models for treatment and control firms matched on current ROA. This study shows (1) performance matching will systematically cause discretionary accruals of either sign to be underestimated, and (2) the measurement error will be negatively correlated with the true discretionary accruals. As a result, using discretionary accruals estimated with performance matching to test whether certain events induce earnings management will increase the frequency of Type II errors, and using them as the dependent or an independent variable in regression analysis will bias the regression coefficient toward zero. The results of our empirical tests are consistent with these predictions.


Earnings management Performance matching Jones-type models 

JEL Classification



  1. Abarbanell, J., & Lehavy, R. (2003). Can stock recommendations predict earnings management and analysts’ earnings forecast errors? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, A., Chen, T., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 238–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayers, B. C., Jiang, X., & Yeung, P. (2006). Discretionary accruals and earnings management: An analysis of pseudo earnings targets. The Accounting Review, 81, 617–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blouin, J., Grein, B., & Rountree, B. (2007). An analysis of forced auditor change: The case of former Arthur Andersen clients. The Accounting Review, 82(3), 621–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botsari, A., & Meeks, G. (2008). Do acquirers manage earnings prior to a share for share bid? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35, 633–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahan, S. F., & Zhang, W. (2006). After Enron: Auditor conservatism and ex-Andersen clients. The Accounting Review, 81(1), 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, D., & Zarowin, P. (2010). Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dechow, P., Hutton, A., Kim, J., & Sloan, R. (2012). Detecting earnings management: A new approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 275–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70, 193–225.Google Scholar
  10. DeFond, M., & Park, C. (2001). The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 76, 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ecker, F., Francis, J., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2011). Peer firm selection for discretionary accrual models. Working Paper, Duke University.Google Scholar
  12. Francis, J., Hanna, J., & Vincent, L. (1996). Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(Supplement), 117–134.Google Scholar
  13. Francis, J., & Yu, M. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holthausen, R., Larcker, D., & Sloan, R. (1995). Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19, 29–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jo, H., & Kim, Y. (2007). Disclosure frequency and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kothari, S., Leone, A., & Wasley, C. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Larcker, D. F., Richardson, S., & Tuna, I. (2007). Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 963–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? The Accounting Review, 86(1), 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Louis, H., Robinson, D., & Sbaraglia, A. (2008). An integrated analysis of the association between accrual disclosure and the abnormal accrual anomaly. Review of Accounting Studies, 13, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsumoto, D. (2002). Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 77, 483–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menon, K., & Williams, D. (2004). Former audit partners and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1095–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prawitt, D. F., Smith, J., & Wood, D. (2009). Internal audit quality and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1255–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of SingaporeSingaporeRepublic of Singapore
  2. 2.University of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations