Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 12, Issue 2–3, pp 217–225 | Cite as

Discussion of “biases in multi-year management financial forecasts: Evidence from private venture-backed U.S. companies”

Article
  • 203 Downloads

Abstract

Armstrong, Dávila, Foster, and Hand (“ADFH”) use a proprietary venture capital database of revenue and profit projections submitted by young firms seeking financing to attempt to address a number of questions related to forecasts by managers of early stage, venture-backed, private entrepreneurial firms. The proprietary dataset together with the creative use of a “historically-grounded conditional projections” methodology are the most interesting features of ADFH’s study. However, these same aspects give rise to empirical design constraints that the study does not fully overcome. In addition, there are numerous leaps of logic required to arrive at some of ADFH’s conclusions and there are alternative explanations for ADFH’s findings that have not been entirely refuted. This leaves the reader with some doubt as to whether all of ADFH’s conclusions are fully substantiated. Nevertheless, the evidence presented makes an interesting contribution to our understanding of the forecasting behavior of young, private, rapidly growing, VCbacked firms, and provides some natural economic and methodological leads into further studies of these issues.

JEL Classifications

G24 M13 M41 

Keywords

Management forecasts Forecasting bias Venture capital Start-ups 

References

  1. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural variables. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruce, B. R., & Bradshaw, M. T. (2004). Analysts, Lies, and Statistics: Cutting Through the Hype in Corporate Earnings Announcements. New York: Institutional Investor Books.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, J. Y., Lettau, M., Malkiel, B., & Xu, Y. (2001). Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Finance, 56, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Faul, J. L., Demers, E. A., Burke, C. M., & Poulter, L. W. (1999) The reproducibility of repeat measures of airway inflammation in stable atopic asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 160, 1457–1461.Google Scholar
  5. Joos, P., & Zhdanov, A. (2006). Earnings and Equity Valuation in the Biotech Industry: Theory and Evidence. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  6. Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14, 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Shiller, R. J. (2000) Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INSEADFontainebleau CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations