Skip to main content

Expected EPS and EPS Growth as Determinantsof Value


This paper develops a parsimonious model relating a firm’s price per share to, (i), next year expected earnings per share (or 12 months forward eps), (ii), short-term growth (FY-2 versus FY- l) in eps, (iii), long-term (asymptotic) growth in eps, and, (iv), cost-of-equity capital. The model assumes that the present value of dividends per share (dps) determines price, but it does not restrict how the dps-sequence is expected to evolve. All of these aspects of the model contrast sharply with the standard (Gordon/Williams) text-book approach, which equates the growth rates of expected eps and dps and fixes the growth rate and the payout rate. Though the constant growth model arises as a peculiar special case, the analysis in this paper rests on more general principles, including dividend policy irrelevancy. A second key result inverts the valuation formula to show how one expresses cost-of-capital as a function of the forward eps to price ratio and the two measures of growth in expected eps. This expression generalizes the text-book equation in which cost-of-capital equals the dps-yield plus the growth in expected eps.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. R. A. Brealey S. C. Myers (1991) Principles of Corporate Finance EditionNumber4 McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Botosan, C. A. (1997). “Disclosure Level and the Cost of Equity Capital.” The Accounting Review 72, S323–S349

  3. Claus, J. and J. Thomas. (1998). “The Equity Risk Premium is Much Lower than you Think it is: Empirical Estimates from a New Approach.” Working paper. Columbia University

  4. A Damodaran (1997) Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Easton, P., G. Taylor and P. Shroff. (2000). “Empirical Estimation of the Expected Rate of Return on a Portfolio of Stocks.” Working paper. University of Melbourne

  6. E. J. Elton M. J. Gruber (1995) Modern Portfolio and Investment Analysis EditionNumber5 John Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fama, E. F. and K. R. French. (2000). “The Equity Premium.” CRSP Working Paper No. 522. University of Chicago

  8. Feltham, G. and J. A. Ohlson. (1995). “Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 689–731

  9. Gebhardt, W., C. Lee and B. Swaninathan. (1999). “Towards an Ex ante Cost-of-Capital.” Working paper. Cornell University

  10. Ohlson, J. A. (1998). “Comments on an Analysis of Historical and Future-oriented Information in Accounting-based Security Valuation Models.” Contemporary Accounting Research (Summer)

  11. Ohlson, J. A. (2000). “Residual Income Valuation: The Problems.” Working Paper. Stern School of Business. New York University

  12. Zhang, X.-J. (2000). “Conservative Accounting and Equity Valuation.” Journal of Accounting and Economics Forthcoming

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohlson, J.A., Juettner-Nauroth, B.E. Expected EPS and EPS Growth as Determinantsof Value. Rev Acc Stud 10, 349–365 (2005).

Download citation


  • Equity valuation
  • EPS
  • EPS growth
  • Dividend policy

JEL Classification

  • M41
  • G12
  • G14