Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics

, Volume 58, Issue 8, pp 561–585 | Cite as

Modification of the High-Latitude Ionospheric F Region By High-Power HF Radio Waves at Frequencies Near the fifth and Sixth Electron Gyroharmonics

  • T. D. Borisova
  • N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya
  • A. S. Kalishin
  • M. T. Rietveld
  • T. K. Yeoman
  • I. Hägström
Article

We study the modification effects of the high-latitude ionospheric F region induced by a highpower O-mode HF radio wave injected towards the magnetic zenith, at frequencies near the fifth and sixth electron gyroharmonics using the EISCAT/Heating facility. Multi-instrument diagnostics with the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar (930 MHz) at Tromsø, Norway, the CUTLASS coherent radar at Hankasalmi, Finland, and stimulated electromagnetic emission (SEE) receiver at Tromsø, has been used for analysis of the observed phenomena. The behavior of the ionospheric plasma parameters (electron’s density and temperature), small-scale artificial field-aligned irregularities, plasma and ion-line spectra, and ionospheric SEE are analyzed in detail. Modification effects near the fifth and sixth electron gyroharmonics have been compared. The coexistence of the thermal (resonance) parametric instability, parametric decay (striction) instability, and/or oscillating two-stream instability was found at these frequencies. The excitation of instabilities occurred at altitudes close to the reflection altitude of the HF pump wave and at the altitudes of the upper-hybrid resonance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. V. Gurevich, Phys. Usp., 50, No. 11, 1091 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. L. Frolov, N. V .Bakhmet’eva, V. V. Belikovich, et al., Phys. Usp., 50, No. 3, 315 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. B. Leyser, Space Sci. Rev., 98, 223 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya, Active Geophysical Effects in the Near-Earth Space [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat, St. Petersburg (2001).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. L. Frolov, I. A. Bolotin, G. P. Komrakov, et al., Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 55, No. 6, 357 (2012).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. M. Grach, V. A. Yashnov, and P. V. Kotov, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 51, No. 7, 499 (2008).CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. L. Frolov, E. N. Sergeev, E. N. Ermakova, et al., Geophys. Res. Lett ., 28, No. 16, 3103 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. N. Sergeev, V. L. Frolov, S. M. Grach, and P. V. Kotov, Adv. Space Res., 38, 2518 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Sergeev, S. Grach, A. Shindin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett ., 110, No. 6, 065002 (2013).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. M. Grach, E. N. Sergeev, A. V. Shindin, et al., Dokl. Phys., 59, No. 2, 62 (2014).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Mahmoudian, W. A. Scales, P. A. Bernhardt, et al., Radio Sci ., 48, No. 6, 685 (2013).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya, T. D. Borisova, T. L. Yeoman, and M. T. Rietveld, Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 53, Nos. 9–10, 512 (2010).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. D. Borisova, N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya, A. S. Kalishin, et al., Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 57, No. 1, 1 (2014).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. T. Rietveld, H. Kohl, H. Kopka, and P. Stubbe, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 55, 577 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Rishbeth and T. van Eyken, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 55, 525 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. A. Greenwald, K. B. Baker, J. R. Dudeney, et al., Space Sci. Rev., 71, 761 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    M. S. Lehtinen and A. Huuskonen, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 435 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Stubbe, H. Kohl, and M. T. Rietveld, J. Geophys. Res., 79, No. A5, 6285 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Stubbe, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 349 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. T. Rietveld, M. J. Kosch, N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya, et al., J. Geophys. Res., 108, No. A4, 1141 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Mishin, T. Hagfors, and W. Kofman, J. Geophys. Res., 102, No. A12, 27265 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya, H. C. Carlson, V. A. Kornienko, et al., Ann. Geophys., 27, 131 (2009).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya, T. D. Borisova, V. A. Kornienko, et al., Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 50, No. 8, 619 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P.V. Ponomarenko, T. B. Leyser, and B. Thidé, J. Geophys. Res., 104, No. A5, 10081 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. M. Grach, Interaction Between the High-Power Radio Waves and the Ionosphere, Part 1, Excitation of the Plasma Turbulence in the Upper Ionosphere, a manual [in Russian], Nizhny Novgorod State Univ., Nizhny Novgorod (2012).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. A. Fejer, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 17, No. 1, 135 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. P. Kuo, M. C. Lee, and P. Kossey, Geophys. Res. Lett ., 24, No. A10, 2969 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. D. Borisova
    • 1
  • N. F. Blagoveshchenskaya
    • 1
  • A. S. Kalishin
    • 1
  • M. T. Rietveld
    • 2
  • T. K. Yeoman
    • 3
  • I. Hägström
    • 4
  1. 1.Arctic and Antarctic Research InstituteSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.ISCAT Scientific AssociationTromsøNorway
  3. 3.Leicester UniversityLeicesterGreat Britain
  4. 4.EISCAT Scientific AssociationKirunaSweden

Personalised recommendations