Abstract
This paper interrogates impediments to post-colonial state-building through a classically liberal lens. Centering on the transactional and ideational-discursive elements of individual-state relations, it identifies two main challenges, one of establishing positive sovereignty, based on a state’s legitimate capacity for action, and one of transitioning to governmentality, governance based on reason and persuasion. A liberal theory of contractualism rooted in Austrian-school and public choice frameworks is developed as a solution to the governmentality and sovereignty gaps in post-colonial states. This approach moves beyond the conventional institutionalism focus on elite actions and social responses to incentives by analytically integrating the transactional pursuit of positive sovereignty with the ideational-discursive construction of governmentality. Noting the impracticality of directly engineering governmentality through policy, the paper traces its organic development via iterative individual-state relations. Contractualism, as conceptualized here, is pivotal for facilitating political and economic transactions that shape emergent relational identities, thereby redefining individual-state dynamics. In short, the emergence of contractualist institutions is key to achieving governmentality and positive sovereignty. This redefinition of the state through contractual relationships offers a fresh perspective on tackling post-colonial state-building challenges.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401.
Amo-Agyemang, C. (2019). Understanding African States in International Relations: On Analytics of Sovereignty versus Elite Governmentality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3499278
Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C., & Leeson, P. (2008). Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(2), 331–358.
Brown, W. (2013). Sovereignty matters: Africa, donors, and the aid relationship. African Affairs, 112(447), 262–282.
Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. (2004). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Edited by Charles Kershaw Rowley. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Buchanan, J. M. (1986). Liberty, Market, and State: Political Economy in the 1980s. New York University Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan (The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
Christie, P. (2006). Changing regimes: Governmentality and education policy in post-apartheid South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(4), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.09.006
Clapham, C. (1996). Governmentality and economic policy in Sub-Saharan Africa. Third World Quarterly, 17(4), 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599615399
Clapham, C. (1999). Sovereignty and the Third World state. Political Studies, 47(3), 522–537.
Demerew, K. (2022). Elites, Rents, and Transitions: A New Institutionalist View of Ethiopia’s Political Development. Africa Today, 68(3), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.2979/africatoday.68.3.04
De Soto, H. (2000). The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. Basic Books.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
Gill, S. (2002). Globalization, Market Civilization and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. The Globalization of Liberalism, 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230519381_7
Greif, A. (2002). Institutions and impersonal exchange: from communal to individual responsibility. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 168–204.
Grovogui, S. N. (2002). Regimes of sovereignty: International morality and the African condition. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 315–338.
Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume 2. University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2007). The Road to Serfdom. Edited by Bruce Caldwell. University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition. University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2014). The Market and Other Orders. Edited by Bruce Caldwell. University of Chicago Press.
Hoffmann, K., & Verweijen, J. (2018). Rebel rule: A governmentality perspective. African Affairs, 118(471), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/ady039
Jackson, R. H. (1986). Negative sovereignty in sub-Saharan Africa. Review of International Studies, 12(4), 247–264.
Jackson, R. H. (1993). Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations and the Third World (No. 12). Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, R. H., & Rosberg, C. G. (1986). Sovereignty and underdevelopment: Juridical statehood in the African crisis. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 24(1), 1–31.
Joseph, J. (2010). The limits of governmentality: Social theory and the international. European Journal of International Relations, 16(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346886
Keynes, J. M. (1991). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Harcourt.
Kirzner, Israel. (2018). Reflections on Ethics, Freedom, Welfare Economics, Policy, and the Legacy of Austrian Economics. Edited by Peter Boettke and Frederic Sautet, Indiana: Liberty Fund.
Kohli, A. (2010). State Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge University Press.
Leeson, P. T. (2005). Endogenizing Fractionalization. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 75–98.
Mamdani, M. (2018). Citizen and Subject. Princeton University Press.
Mamdani, M. (2020). Neither Settler nor Native. The Belknap Press.
Massoud, M. F. (2014). Law’s Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan. Cambridge University Press.
Mbaku, J. M. (2018). International Law and Limits on the Sovereignty of African States. Fla. J. Int’l l., 30, 43.
Menger, Carl. (2009). Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics. Edited by Louis Schneider. Trans. Francis Nock. Auburn, Alabama: Mises Institute.
Mises, Ludwig Von. (2007). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Volume 2. Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Fund.
Mousseau, M., Orsun, O., Ungerer J., and Mousseau, D. (2013). Capitalism and Peace: It’s Keynes, not Hayek. In Schneider, G. & Gleditsch (eds.), Assessing the Capitalist Peace (pp. 80–110), London: Routledge.
Mousseau, M. (2013). The democratic peace unraveled: It’s the economy. International Studies Quarterly, 57(1), 186–197.
Mousseau, M. (2019). The End of War: How a Robust Marketplace and Liberal Hegemony Are Leading to Perpetual World Peace. International Security 44(1), 160–196. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/730800.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
North, D. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.
North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. (2013). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge University Press.
Okogbule, N. S. (2008). Globalization, economic sovereignty and African development: From principles to realities. Journal of Third World Studies, 25(1), 213–231.
Posner, E. A. (1998). Symbols, signals, and social norms in politics and the law. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 765–797.
Reno, W. (2001). How sovereignty matters: international markets and the political economy of local politics in weak states. Intervention and transnationalism in Africa: global-local networks of power, 197–215.
Reus-Smit, C. (2002). Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856x.00091
Rosenberg, J. (2001). The empire of civil society: A critique of the realist theory of international relations. Verso.
Rupert, M., & Solomon, M. S. (2006). Globalization and international political economy: the politics of alternative futures. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Scott, J. C. (2012). Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play. Princeton University Press.
Scott, J. C. (2017). Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. Yale University Press.
Stilz, A. (2009). Why do states have territorial rights? International Theory, 1(2), 185–213.
Teschke, B. (2011). The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. Verso.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful for support for this project from the Institute for Humane Studies (grant no. IHS016594).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Demerew, K. Contractualism in post-colonial state-building: A liberal approach to sovereignty and governmentality. Rev Austrian Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-024-00640-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-024-00640-8