Skip to main content

Freedom in context: A review essay of The Dialectics of Liberty

Abstract

The contributors to The Dialectics of Liberty demonstrate that libertarians can engage in a careful context-sensitive analysis of social behavior and political ideals. The book refutes the notion that libertarians must be insensitive to nuances in social environments and reliant on a woefully oversimplified conception of individuals, businesses, and governments. In this review, I first discuss the nature of dialectics, making explicit the mostly implicit definition running between the chapters of The Dialectics. I then summarize several of the chapters, synthesizing from them generalizable lessons about what Austrian economists and classical liberal scholars more generally can learn by being mindful of social context, synthesizing disparate ideas, and transcending dichotomies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. These are not formally rigorous arguments, but I trust the reader will allow them to stand in for ones.

  2. This hints at the conceptual origins of the thesis-antithesis-synthesis trope commonly associated with dialectics and sometimes erroneously attributed to Hegel despite more properly belonging to Fichte (2019, p. 22).

  3. This is likely to be an opportunity especially important for Austrians to exploit vigorously while many economists are distracted by the extremely un-dialectical methods of randomized control trials in developing economies.

  4. Many, thinking along the lines of James Buchanan and Richard Wagner in Democracy in Deficit (1977), might be more inclined to put demand management in the primary interventions category.

References

  • Anderson, E. (2017). Private government: how employers rule our lives (and why we don’t talk about it). Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. S. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissel, R. E., Sciabarra, C. M., & Younkins, E. W. (Eds.). (2019). The dialectics of liberty: exploring the context of human freedom. London: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., Salter, A. W., & Smith, D. J. (2021). Money and the rule of law: generality and predictability in monetary institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J., & Storr, V. H. (2002). Post-classical political economy: polity, society and economy in Weber, Mises and Hayek. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(1), 161–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: the political legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamlee-Wright, E. (2008). The structure of social capital: an Austrian Perspective on its nature and development. Review of Political Economy, 20(1), 41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grube, L. E., & Storr, V. H. (2018). Embedded entrepreneurs and post-disaster community recovery. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(7–8), 800–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1985a). Rivalry and central planning: the socialist calculation debate reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1985b). National economic planning: what is left?. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, D. (1993). Democracy, markets, and the legal order: notes on the nature of politics in a radically liberal society. Social Philosophy & Policy, 10(2), 103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. G., & Lancaster, K. (1956). The general theory of the second best. The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, R. T. (2002). Alabama Philosophical Society 2002 Presidential Address: why does justice have good consequences? https://praxeology.net/whyjust.htm. Accessed June 14, 2022

  • Martin, A. (2010). Emergent politics and the power of ideas. Studies in Emergent Order, 3, 212–245

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (2016). Bourgeois equality: how ideas, not capital or institutions, enriched the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciabarra, C. M. (1995). Marx, Hayek, and utopia. Albany: State University of New York Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciabarra, C. M. (2000). Total freedom: toward a dialectical libertarianism. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciabarra, C. M. (2013). Ayn Rand: the Russian radical. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Storr, V. H., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Grube, L. E. (2015). Community revival in the wake of disaster: lessons in local entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thierer, A. (2016). Permissionless innovation: the continuing case for comprehensive technological freeom. Arlington: Mercatus Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. (2014). Entangled political economy: a keynote address. Advances in Austrian Economics, 18, 15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander W. Craig.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craig, A.W. Freedom in context: A review essay of The Dialectics of Liberty. Rev Austrian Econ (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-022-00590-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-022-00590-z

Keywords

  • Dialectics
  • libertarianism
  • methodology
  • political philosophy

JEL classification

  • A12
  • B4
  • B53
  • Y3
  • Z13