Markets as objects of study in their own right have been given surprisingly little attention within neoclassical economics. The market has, in contrast, remained in the foreground for heterodox schools of economics, including market process theory. This essay suggests that the market remained in the analytical foreground for market process theorists even as it was increasingly absent in neoclassical economics on account of the different ontological commitments characterizing the two traditions. Attending to the ontological dimension of economic thought offers us a more complete understanding of how economics could become disconnected from the markets of the real world as well as why it was retained by heterodox economists.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265–290.
Blaug, M. (1980). The methodology of economics: Or how economists explain. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blaug, M. (1996). Economic theory in retrospect (5th edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boettke, P. J. (1997). Where did economics go wrong? Modern economics as a flight from reality. Critical Review, 11(1), 11–64.
Boettke, P. J., & Beaulier, S. A. (2004). The really real in economics. In P. Lewis (Ed.), Transforming economics: Perspectives on the critical realist project (pp. 187–201). London: Routledge.
Boettke, P. J., & Storr, V. H. (2002). Post-classical political economy: Polity, society, and economy in weber, Mises, and Hayek. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(1), 161–191.
Buchanan, J. M. (1964). What should economists do? Southern Economic Journal, 30(3), 213–222.
Caldwell, B. (1982). Beyond positivism: Economic methodology in the twentieth century. New York: Routledge.
Coase, R. (1988). The firm, the market, and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fleetwood, S. (1995). Hayek’s political economy: The socio-economics of order. London: Routledge.
Friedman, M. 1966. Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F.A. 1971. Principles or expediency? In Toward Liberty: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises Volume I, Menlo Park, CA, Institute for Humane Studies
Hayek, F. A. (1979). The counter-revolution of science. Liberty Fund: Indianapolis.
Hayek, F. A. 2011 The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press
Hicks, J. (1965). Capital and growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Holcombe, R. G. (2008). Advancing economic analysis beyond the equilibrium framework. Review of Austrian Economics, 21(4), 225–249.
Jackson, W. A. (2019). Markets: Perspectives from economic and social theory. New York: Routledge.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kirzner, I.M. (1976). On the Method of Austrian Economics, in Dolan, E.G. (ed.) The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Kansas City, MO, Sheed & Ward, 40–51.
Kirzner, I.M. 1982. Uncertainty, discovery, and human action: A study of the entrepreneurial profile in the Misesian system, in Kirzner, I.M. (ed.) Method, Process, and Austrian economics: Essays in honor of Ludwig von Mises, Lexington, MA, Lexington Books, 139–160
Kirzner, I. M. (2000). The driving force of the market:Essays in Austrian economics. New York: Routledge.
Lachmann, L. M. (1971). The legacy of max weber. Berkeley: The Glendessary Press.
Lachmann, L. M. 1977. Capital, expectations, and the market process: Essays on the theory of the market economy, (W. grinder, ed.) Menlo Park, CA, Institute of Humane Studies
Lachmann, L. M. (1986). The market as an economic process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lachmann, L. M. (1976). Austrian Economics in the Age of the Neo-Ricardian Counterrevolution, in Dolan, E.G. (ed.). The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Kansas City, MO, Sheed & Ward, 215–223.
Lavoie, D. (1990). Understanding differently: Hermeneutics and the spontaneous order of communicative processes. In B. Caldwell (Ed.), Carl Menger and his legacy in economics (pp. 359–378). Durham: Duke University Press.
Lavoie, D. (2015). The discovery and interpretation of profit opportunities: Culture and the Kirznerian entrepreneur. In L. E. Grube & V. H. Storr (Eds.), Culture and economic action (pp. 48–67). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lavoie, D., & Chamlee-Wright, E. (2000). Culture and Enterprise: The development, representation, and morality of business. London: Routledge.
Lawson, C. (1996). Realism, theory and individualism in the work of Carl Menger. Review of Social Economy, 54(4), 445–464.
Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and reality. London: Routledge.
Lewis, P. (2005). Boettke, the Austrian school and the reclamation of reality in modern economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 18(1), 83–108.
Lewis, P. (2008a). Uncertainty, power, and trust. Review of Austrian Economics, 21(2–3), 183–198.
Lewis, P. (2008b). Solving the ‘Lachmann problem’: Orientation, individualism, and the causal explanation of socioeconomic order. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(5), 827–857.
Lewis, P. (2010). Certainly not! A critical realist recasting of Ludwig von Mises’s methodology of the social sciences. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17(3), 277–299.
Lewis, P. (2011). Far from a nihilistic crowd: The theoretical contribution of radical subjectivist Austrian economics. Review of Austrian Economics, 24(2), 185–198.
Lewis, P. (2015). Notions of order and process in Hayek: The significance of emergence. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(4), 1167–1190.
Lewis, P. (2016). Systems, structural properties, and levels of organization: The influence of Ludwig von Bertalanffy on the work of F.a. Hayek. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 34A, 125–160.
Lewis, P. (2017). Shackle on choice, imagination, and creativity: Hayekian foundations. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(1), 1–24.
Lewis, P., & Runde, J. (2007). Subjectivism, social structure and the possibility of socio-economic order: The case of Ludwig Lachmann. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62(2), 167–186.
Lie, J. (1997). Sociology of markets. Annual Reviews in Sociology, 23, 341–360.
Littlechild, S. C. (1982). Equilibrium and the market process. In I. M. Kirzner (Ed.), Method, process, and Austrian economics: Essays in honor of Ludwig von Mises. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Maki, U. (1990). Mengerian economics in realist perspective. In B. Caldwell (Ed.), Carl Menger and his legacy in economics (pp. 289–312). Durham: Duke University Press.
Maki, U. (1992). The market as an isolated causal process: A metaphysical ground for realism. In B. Caldwell & S. Boehm (Eds.), Austrian economics: Tensions and new directions (pp. 35–66). Boston: Kluwer.
McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Menger, C. 1985. Investigations Into the Method of the Social Sciences, Schneider, L. (ed.), nock, F. J. (trans.), New York, New York University press
Mises, L. 1978 Epistemological Problems of Economics, New York, New York University press
Mises, L. 1996 Human Action, Little Rock, AK, fox & Wilkes
Mittermeier, K. 1986. Mechanomorphism, in Kirzner, I.M. (ed.) Subjectivism, Intelligibility, and economic understanding: Essays in honor of Ludwig M. Lachmann on his Eightieth Birthday, New York, New York University Press, 236–251
North, D. (1977). Markets and other allocation Systems in History: The challenge of Karl Polanyi. Journal of European Economic History, 3, 703–716.
O’Driscoll, G. P., & Rizzo, M. J. (1996). The economics of time and ignorance. New York: Routledge.
Rogers, C. (2018). The conceptual flaw in the microeconomic foundations of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models. Review of Political Economy, 30(1), 72–83.
Runde, J. (2001). Bringing social structure Back into economics: On critical realism and Hayek’s scientism essay. Review of Austrian Economics, 14(1), 5–24.
Stigler, G. (1957). Perfect competition, historically contemplated. Journal of Political Economy, 65(1), 1–17.
Stigler, G. (1967). Imperfections in the capital market. Journal of Political Economy, 75(3), 287–292.
Storr, V. H. (2008). The market as a social space: On the meaningful extraeconomic conversations that can take place in markets. Review of Austrian Economics, 21(2–3), 135–150.
Swedberg, R. (1994). Markets as social structures. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 255–282). Princeton University Press: Princeton.
Vaughn, K. I. (1994). Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, R. E. (1999). Austrian cycle theory: Saving the wheat and discarding the chaff. Review of Austrian Economics, 12(1), 65–80.
Zwirn, G. (2007). Methodological individualism or methodological atomism: The case of Friedrich Hayek. History of Political Economy, 39(1), 47–80.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, S., Storr, V.H. The market as foreground: The ontological status of the market in market process theory. Rev Austrian Econ (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-020-00535-4
- Critical realism
- Heterodox economics
- Market process theory
- Social ontology