Private Governance and the three biases of political philosophy

Article

Abstract

Private Governance shows that philosophers, political and legal theorists, and social scientists mistakenly believe in legal centralism, the view that order in the world depends upon and is made possible by state law. In fact, most governance not only happens to be private, but must be private. This paper extends Edward Stringham’s argument by claiming that philosophers tend to suffer from three biases. Diffidence bias means they are overly pessimistic about people’s willingness and ability to cooperate without state enforcement. Statism bias means the overestimate the degree to which cooperation is secured by the state. Guarantee bias means they overestimate the value and need for legal guarantees.

Keywords

Polycentric law Anarchism Elinor Ostrom Cooperation Prisoner’s dilemma Trust game Assurance 

JEL classification

B53 P12 P14 P48 Y80 

References

  1. Brennan, J., & Jaworski, P. (2015). Markets without limits. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brennan, J., & van der Vossen, V. (2017). The myths of the self-ownership thesis. In J. Brennan, V. van der Vossen, & D. Schmidtz (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hasnas, J. (2008) The obviousness of anarchy. Anarchism/Minarchism: Is Government Part of a Free Country, ed. R. Long and T. Machan. Surrey: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hobbes, T. (1998 [1651]). Leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Holmes, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2000). The cost of rights: Why liberty depends on taxes. New York: W.V. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Kavka, G. S. (1995). Why even morally perfect people would need government. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leeson, P. (2014). Anarchy unbound: Why self-governance works better than you think. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Locke, J. (1924 [1690]). Two treatises of government. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
  9. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Stringham, P. E. (2015). Private governance: Creating order in economic and social life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations