The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 447–467 | Cite as

Social capital and social learning after Hurricane Sandy

  • Virgil Henry Storr
  • Stefanie Haeffele-Balch
  • Laura E. GrubeEmail author


The post-disaster context is one characterized by profound uncertainty. Those affected by the storm, or earthquake, or flood, must determine what strategies to pursue in response to the disaster and must find ways to coordinate their recovery efforts with others in their community. Ex ante it is not clear what strategies will be most effective. If communities are to recover after a disaster, community members must engender and engage in a process of social learning involving experimentation, communication, and imitation. This paper explores the post-disaster social learning process. Specifically, we focus on the importance of social capital in facilitating social learning after a disaster, including facilitating community members’ ability to communicate their desire to return, to assess damage, to overcome barriers to rebuilding through collective yet voluntary action, and to learn from and imitate others’ successes. Focusing on how this process took place after Hurricane Sandy in Rockaway, New York, especially within the Orthodox Jewish community, we examine how community groups (a) adapted existing organization structures and (b) created new procedures and imitated the successful actions of others in order to spur recovery.


Disaster recovery Social learning Social capital Hurricane Sandy Rockaway, NY 

JEL classification

B53 D71 D83 Q54 


  1. Aldrich, D. (2011). The power of people: social Capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Natural Hazards, 56(3), 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, D. (2012). Building resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsky, L., J. Trainor, and M. Torres. (2006). Disaster Realities in the Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Revisiting the Looting Myth. Disaster Research Center. Available online at:
  5. Beggs, J., Haines, V., & Hurlbert, J. (1996). Situational contingencies surrounding the receipt of informal support. Social Forces, 75(1), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bensoussan, B. (2012). Mold, rot & truckloads of goodwill. Mishpacha Jewish Family Weekly, 437, 54–62.Google Scholar
  7. BIA (2006). Meeting Minutes: January 18, 2006. New Orleans, LA: Broadmoor Improvement Association, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Birch, E., & Wachter, S. (Eds.) (2006). Rebuilding urban places after disaster: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blake, E. S., T. B. Kimberlain, R. J. Berg, J. P. Cangialosi, and J. L. Beven II. (2013). Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Sandy. National Hurricane Center. Available online:
  10. Boettke, P., Chamlee-Wright, E., Gordon, P., Ikeda, S., Leeson, P. T., & Sobel., R. (2007). The political, economic, and social aspects of Katrina. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2), 363–376.Google Scholar
  11. Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: community-based approaches to unmet recovery needs. Disasters, 22(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  13. Burt, R. (2001). Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine De Grutyer..Google Scholar
  14. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2007). The Long Road Back: Signal Noise in the Post-Katrina Context. The Independent Review, 12(2), 235–259.Google Scholar
  15. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2010). The cultural and political economy of recovery: social learning in a post-disaster environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2011). Operationalizing the Interpretive Turn: deploying qualitative methods toward an economics of meaning. Review of Austrian Economics, 24(2), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chamlee-Wright, E. (2015). Pastor’s Response in Post-Katrina New Orleans: Navigating the cultural economic landscape. In L. Grube & V. H. Storr (Eds.), Culture and Economic Action. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Myers, J. (2008). Discovery and social learning in non-priced environments: An Austrian view of social network theory. The Review of Austrian Economics, 21, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chamlee-Wright, E. and V. H. Storr. (2009a). “Filling the Civil Society Vacuum: Post-Disaster Policy and Community Response.” Mercatus Center Policy Series, Policy Comment No. 2. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University.Google Scholar
  20. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Storr, V. H. (2009b). Club Goods and Post-Disaster Community Return. Rationality and Society, 21(4), 429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Storr, V. H. (2010). The Role of Social Entrepreneurship in Post-Katrina Community Recovery. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 2(1/2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chamlee-Wright, E., & Storr, V. H. (2011). Social capital, lobbying, and Community-Based Interest Groups. Public Choice, 149(1–2), 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cigler, B. (2009). Post-Katrina hazard mitigation on the Gulf coast. Public Organization Review, 9(4), 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coyne, C., & Lemke, J. (2012). Lessons from the Cultural and Political Economy of Recovery. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71(1), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliott, J., & Pais, J. (2006). Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: social differences in human responses to disaster. Social Science Research 35, 295–321.Google Scholar
  27. Grube, L., & Storr, V. H. (2014). The capacity for self-governance and post-disaster resiliency. The Review of Austrian Economics, 27(3), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins, R. L., & Maurer, K. (2010). Bonding, bridging and linking: how social capital operated in New Orleans following hurricane Katrina. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1777–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Helliwell, J., & Putnam., R. (1995). Economic growth and Social Capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(3), 295–307.Google Scholar
  30. Hurlbert, J., Haines, V., & Beggs, J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: what kinds of routine networks allocate resources in Nonroutine situations? American Sociological Review, 65(4), 598–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hurlbert, J., Beggs, J., & Haines, V. (2001). Social Capital in Extreme Environments. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter..Google Scholar
  32. Johannisson, B., & Olaison, L. (2007). The moment of truth—reconstructing entrepreneurship and social capital in the eye of the storm. Review of Social Economy, 65(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lightman, H. (2013). Hurricane Sandy a spiritual response: voices from the storm. Jewish Action, 73(3), 28–30.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, M. 2012. “Youth help guide Sandy relief effort in Queens.” CBS News. Available online:
  35. Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social capital: a missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
  36. Patterson, O., Weil, F., & Patel, K. (2010). The role of community in disaster response: conceptual models. Population Research and Policy Review, 29(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, S. (2013). Hurricane Sandy a spiritual response: voices from the storm. Jewish Action, 73(3), 35–36.Google Scholar
  40. Schneider, S. (2008). Who’s to blame? (Mis)perceptions of the intergovernmental response to disasters. Plubius. The Journal of Federalism, 38(4), 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, D., & Sutter, D. (2013). Response and recovery after the Joplin tornado: lessons applied and lessons learned.” The. Independent Review, 18(2), 165–188.Google Scholar
  42. Springer, C. G. (2011). Achieving community preparedness post-Katrina. Available at:
  43. Storr, V. H., & Haeffele-Balch, S. (2012). Post-disaster community recovery in heterogeneous, loosely connected communities. Review of Social Economy, 70(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Storr, V. H., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Grube, L. (2015). Community revival in the wake of disaster lessons in local entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. The Wave. 2013. “Rockaway Citizens Safety Patrol Report.” The Wave, November 29, 2013. Available online:
  46. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., & Renn, O. (1995). Public Participation in Impact Assessment: A Social Learning Perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virgil Henry Storr
    • 1
  • Stefanie Haeffele-Balch
    • 1
  • Laura E. Grube
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Beloit CollegeBeloitUSA

Personalised recommendations