Advertisement

The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 365–375 | Cite as

A social morality for mortals: A review essay of the order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world

  • Peter J. BoettkeEmail author
  • Rosolino A. Candela
Article

Abstract

This essay praises Gerald Gaus’s The Order of Public Reason as a building block for all normative explorations into the institutional foundations of human sociability. It evaluates the normative implications put forth by Gaus in terms of the Kirzner’s “finder’s keeper’s ethic.” This raises a question about the relationship between the moral order and the political order that underlies market processes. Examining the role of entrepreneurship in the market process in relation to Kirzner’s “finder’s keeper’s principle” suggests a deeper ethical foundation that underpins the institutional conditions of “social morality.”

Keywords

Gerald Gaus Israel Kirzner Socialist calculation debate Political economy 

JEL classification

B2 B53 P16 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Douglas Den Uyl, Douglas Rasmussen, and Solomon Stein for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

  1. Aristotle. (2000). Nichomachean ethics, translated and edited by Roger Crisp. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boettke, P. (1987). Virginia political economy: a view from Vienna. Market Process, 5(2), 7–15.Google Scholar
  3. Boettke, P. (2012). Living economics: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Oakland: The Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J. M. (1965). Ethical rules, expected values, and large numbers. Ethics, 76(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty: between anarchy and leviathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Candela, R., & Powell, B. (2014). Markets as processes of moral discovery. Studies In Emergent. Order, 7, 258–272.Google Scholar
  7. Den Uyl, D. J. (2009). Homo moralis. Review of Austrian Economics, 22, 349–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaus, G. (2011). The order of public reason: a theory of freedom in a diverse and bounded world. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. (1968 [2002]). Competition as a discovery procedure. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), 9–23.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. (1948[1980]). Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Horwitz, S. (2008). Monetary calculation and the extension of social cooperation into anonymity. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 23(2), 81–93.Google Scholar
  13. Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kirzner, I. (1988). Some ethical implications for capitalism of the socialist calculation debate. Social Philosophy & Policy, 6(1), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lavoie, D. (1985). National economic planning: what is left? Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Lomasky, L. (1990). Persons, rights and moral community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue: a study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  18. McCloskey, D. (2007). The bourgeois virtues: ethics for an age of commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. McCloskey, D. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, F. (1983). Rationality and freedom in Aristotle and Hayek. Reason Papers, 9, 29–36.Google Scholar
  21. Mises, L. (1949 [2007]). Human action: a treatise on economics. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  22. Norton, D. (1976). Personal destinies: a philosophy of ethical individualism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rasmussen, D., & Den Uyl, D. (1991). Liberty and nature: an Aristotelian defense of liberal order. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  24. Rasmussen, D., & Den Uyl, D. (2005). Norms of liberty: a perfectionist basis for non-perfectionist politics. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wall, S. (2013). Public reason and moral authoritarianism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 63(250), 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations