I respond to the three excellent reviewers, who have covered well some of the most difficult issues raised by the arguments in The Tyranny of Experts. These include the good intentions of aid officials supporting autocrats, the role of Western history and current Western travails in the debate on freedom, distinguishing good and bad experts, advocating principles vs. tangible interventions, the serious flaws of democracy and not overstating the case for democracy, the question of whether some academics are also technocrats, the value of freedom as an end in itself, and the definition of democracy as to whether it includes individual rights. Finally and most controversially, I address the biggest question raised by the reviewers (and many others): what should we do? I say why I believe this question is the wrong one, why I refuse to answer it, and suggest more constructive ways to debate freedom and development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Eltis and Engerman (2000)
Sokoloff and Engerman (2000)
The argument is similar to that of Boettke and Leeson, who argue that freedom is more robust to the worst case scenario of malevolent or ignorant political leaders and officials (Boettke and Leeson 2004).
Persson and Tabellini (2009).
Quoted from Klamer (1988).
Doemeland and Trevino (2014).
Speech transcript (2014)
Boettke, P. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2004). Liberalism, socialism and robust political economy. Journal of Markets and Morality, 7(1), 99–111.
Chavkin S (2015) World Bank President Admits ‘Deep Concern’ On Evictions. ICIJ. http://www.icij.org/blog/2015/03/world-bank-president-admits-deep-concern-evictions. Accessed May 27, 2015.
Doemeland D, Trevino J (2014) Which World Bank Reports are Widely Read? The World Bank Development Economics Vice Presidency, Operations and Strategy Unit, Policy Research Working Paper: 6851.
Eltis, D., & Engerman, S. L. (2000). The importance of slavery and the slave trade to industrializing Britain. Journal of Economic History, 60, 123–144.
Klamer, A. (1988). Conversations with economics: New classical economists and opponents speak out on the current Controvery in macroeconomics. Maryland: Roman & Littlefield.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2009). Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change. American Economic Journal, 2, 88–126.
Orban V (2014) Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp. http://www.kormany.hu/en/the-prime-minister/the-prime-minister-s-speeches/prime-minister-viktor-orban-s-speech-at-the-25th-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp. Accessed November 1, 2014.
Sokoloff, K. & Engerman S. (2000). History lessons: Institutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the new world. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, (3), 217–232.
About this article
Cite this article
Easterly, W. Response to reviewers on “The Tyranny of Experts”. Rev Austrian Econ 28, 425–441 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-015-0326-8