This paper reexamines key themes in Friedrich Hayek’s work, including his early macroeconomics and work on overinvestment, as well as his critiques of socialism and corporatism. The paper argues that Hayek’s concern was over economic efficiency rather than innovation. Hayek viewed innovation as exogenous to the business sector, as did Schumpeter. A likely reason for his resistance to innovation as indigenous to the business world was his unease about a theory of the capitalist economy in which the future is indeterminate. Viewing innovation as rare and exogenous helped to minimize the problem of indeterminacy in his economic model. While Hayek’s great ideas will continue to be revered, economic scholarship must now build an economics that gives central place to indigenous innovation in determining a modern economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1961). The Non sequitur of the ‘dependence effect,’. Southern Economic Journal, 27(4), 346–48.
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago..
Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945). “The Uses of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review, 35.4 : 519–30. Reprinted in Chiaki Nishiyama and Kurt R. Leube (eds.), The Essence of Hayek.Stanford, California, 1984.
Hoon, Hian Teck, and Edmund S. Phelps. (2008). “Future Fiscal and Budgetary Shocks.” Journal of Economic Theory 143.1: 499–518.
Keynes, John Maynard. (1971). The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XXVIILondon: MacMillan, : 385–8.
Lange, O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism, part One. Review of Economic Studies, 4(1), 53–71.
Morgenstern, Oskar. (1976). “Volkommenevoraussicht undwirtschaftlichesgleichgewicht,” ZeitschriftfürNationalökonomie, vol. 6 (1935: 337–57. Translated in English as “Perfect Foresight and Economic Equilibrium,” in Schotter, 169–83.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap of Harvard UP.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Phelps, Edmund S. (2013). Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change. Princeton: Princeton UP.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Trans. Redvers opie. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
About this article
Cite this article
Phelps, E.S. Hayek’s new ideas and present-day ones. Rev Austrian Econ 28, 253–256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-015-0308-x
- Exogenous innovation
- JEL Code