The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 253–256 | Cite as

Hayek’s new ideas and present-day ones

  • Edmund S. PhelpsEmail author


This paper reexamines key themes in Friedrich Hayek’s work, including his early macroeconomics and work on overinvestment, as well as his critiques of socialism and corporatism. The paper argues that Hayek’s concern was over economic efficiency rather than innovation. Hayek viewed innovation as exogenous to the business sector, as did Schumpeter. A likely reason for his resistance to innovation as indigenous to the business world was his unease about a theory of the capitalist economy in which the future is indeterminate. Viewing innovation as rare and exogenous helped to minimize the problem of indeterminacy in his economic model. While Hayek’s great ideas will continue to be revered, economic scholarship must now build an economics that gives central place to indigenous innovation in determining a modern economy.


Adaptation Indeterminacy Overinvestment Socialism Corporatism Exogenous innovation 
JEL Code B2 B3 


  1. Hayek, Friedrich A. (1961). The Non sequitur of the ‘dependence effect,’. Southern Economic Journal, 27(4), 346–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hayek, Friedrich A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago..Google Scholar
  3. Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945). “The Uses of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review, 35.4 : 519–30. Reprinted in Chiaki Nishiyama and Kurt R. Leube (eds.), The Essence of Hayek.Stanford, California, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. Hoon, Hian Teck, and Edmund S. Phelps. (2008). “Future Fiscal and Budgetary Shocks.” Journal of Economic Theory 143.1: 499–518.Google Scholar
  5. Keynes, John Maynard. (1971). The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. XXVIILondon: MacMillan, : 385–8.Google Scholar
  6. Lange, O. (1936). On the economic theory of socialism, part One. Review of Economic Studies, 4(1), 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Morgenstern, Oskar. (1976). “Volkommenevoraussicht undwirtschaftlichesgleichgewicht,” ZeitschriftfürNationalökonomie, vol. 6 (1935: 337–57. Translated in English as “Perfect Foresight and Economic Equilibrium,” in Schotter, 169–83.Google Scholar
  8. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap of Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  9. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  10. Phelps, Edmund S. (2013). Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change. Princeton: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
  11. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Trans. Redvers opie. Cambridge: Harvard UP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Center on Capitalism and SocietyColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations